PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY| 1 | | | | GENERAL INFORMATION | | | | | | 13 | | | | | | PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON | | | | | | | 24 | | | 89 | | | 10 | | 916 | | | | | | SECURITY OWNERSHIP | | | | | | 16 | | | | 10 | | | | | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | | | | | | | 1218 | | | 1319 | | | 16 | | | 18 | | | 21 | | 22 | | 24 | | | | | EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | | | | | | | 2124 | | 34 | | | | 36 | | | | | FINANCIAL | | | | | | | 5141 | | | 5241 | | | | | | APPENDIX A | | | | | | | 53 42 | SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES,INDUSTRIES, INC. 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037 This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Date: | April 30, 2015 | | Time: | 9:15 a.m. - doors will open to the public for continental breakfast 10:00 a.m. - meeting begins 11:00 a.m. - meeting adjourns | | Place: | Stockton Seaview Hotel and Golf Club, Bayview Room 401 South New York Road Galloway, New Jersey Please see the back of the Proxy for parking instructions. | | Admission to the meeting: | Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to shareholders as of the record date, their authorized representatives and guests of SJI. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, you will need an admission ticket and a valid government issued photo ID to enter the meeting. For shareholders of record, an admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please bring your account statement as that will serve as your ticket. | | Record Date: | March 2, 2015 | | Agenda: | Election of 10 directors each to serve a term of one year Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation Adoption of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015 Transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting | | Voting: | Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. |
Voting Matters and the Board’s Recommendation The following table summarizes the items that will be brought for a vote of our stockholders at the meeting, along with the Board’s recommendation as to how shareholders should vote on each of them. | Proposal No. | Description of Proposal | Board’s Recommendation | | 1 | Election of 10 director candidates nominated by the Board, each to serve a one-year term | FOR | | 2 | Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation | FOR | | 3 | Adoption of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan | FOR | | 4 | Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015 | FOR |
In addition to these matters, shareholders may be asked to vote on such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Votes Required for Approval The table below summarizes the votes required for approval of each matter to be brought before the annual meeting, as well as the treatment of abstentions and broker non-votes. | Proposal No. | Description of Proposal | Vote Required for Approval | Abstentions | Broker Non Votes | | 1 | Election of directors | Plurality of votes cast | Not applicable | Not taken into account | | 2 | Executive compensation | Majority of votes cast | No effect | Not taken into account | | 3 | Adoption of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan | Majority of votes cast | No effect | Not taken into account | | 4 | Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm | Majority of votes cast | No effect | Not applicable |
Director Nominees The Board is currently comprised of: nine independent directors; our Chairman, who is also our Chief Executive Officer; and our President. The following table provides summary information about each of the 10 director nominees, including whether the Board considers the nominee to be independent under the New York Stock Exchange’s independence standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Each director is elected annually by a plurality of votes cast. | Name | Age | Director Since | Occupation | Independent | Positions/Committee Memberships | | Sarah M. Barpoulis | 50 | 2012 | Owner of Interim Energy Solutions, LLC | Yes | 1, 4 | | Thomas A. Bracken | 67 | 2004 | President, New Jersey Chamber of Commerce | Yes | 1, 3, 5* | | Keith S. Campbell | 60 | 2000 | Chairman of the Board, Mannington Mills, Inc. | Yes | 2*, 3, 5 | | Victor A. Fortkiewicz | 63 | 2010 | Of Counsel, Cullen and Dykman, LLP | Yes | 4, 5 | | Sheila Hartnett-Devlin, CFA | 56 | 1999 | Senior Vice President, American Century Investments | Yes | 1*, 2, 3 | | Walter M. Higgins III | 70 | 2008 | Director, President and CEO at Ascendant Group Ltd. and President and CEO of Bermuda Electric Light Company Limited | Yes | 1, 3, 4* | | Sunita Holzer | 53 | 2011 | President, Human Capital insight, LLC | Yes | 2, 5 | | Joseph H. Petrowski | 61 | 2008 | Managing Partner and Founder, Mercantor Partners, LLC | Yes | 1, 3, 4 | | Michael J. Renna | 47 | 2014 | President and COO, South Jersey Industries | No | | | Frank L. Sims | 64 | 2012 | Retired, Corporate Vice President and Platform Leader, Cargill, Inc. | Yes | 1, 2 |
Key to Committee Memberships: | 1 | | Audit Committee | | | 2 | | Compensation Committee | | | 3 | | Executive Committee | | | 4 | | Governance Committee | | | 5 | | Corporate Responsibility Committee | | | * | | Committee Chair | |
This statement is furnished on behalf of SJI’s Board of Directors to solicit proxies for use at its 20132015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The meeting is scheduled for Friday,Thursday, April 19, 2013,30, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. at The Mansion on Main Street, 3000 Main Street, Voorhees,Stockton Seaview Hotel and Golf Club, 401 South New York Road, Galloway, New Jersey. The approximate date proxy materials will be sentmade available to shareholders is March 18, 2013.30, 2015. A copy of the proxy statement, proxy card and Annual Report to shareholders are available on our website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors”. PROXY SOLICITATION The Company bears the cost of this solicitation, which is primarily made by mail. However, the Corporate Secretary or company employees may solicit proxies by phone, fax, e-mail or in person, but they will not be separately compensated for these services. The Company may also use a proxy-soliciting firm at a cost not expected to exceed $6,000, plus expenses, to distribute to brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries additional copies of the proxy materials and Annual Report to Shareholders for beneficial owners of our stock. Record Date Only shareholders of record at the close of business on February 19, 2013March 2, 2015 may vote at the meeting. On that date, the Company had 31,744,91634,211,973 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Shareholders are entitled to one vote per share on each matter to be acted upon. Quorum and Vote Required A quorum is necessary to conduct the meeting’s business. This means holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock must be present at the meeting, either by proxy or in person. Shareholders elect Directors by a plurality vote of all votes cast at the meeting. The other actions proposed herein require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. The vote required to approve any other matter that may be properly brought before the Annual Meeting will be determined in accordance with the New Jersey Business Corporation Act. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as present to determine a quorum but will not be deemed to be cast and, therefore, will not affect the outcome of any of the shareholder questions. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Voting of Proxies and Revocation Properly signed proxies received by the Company will be voted at the meeting. If a proxy contains a specific instruction about any matter to be acted on, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted according to those instructions. If you sign and return your proxy but do not indicate how to vote for a particular matter, your shares will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends. A shareholder who returns a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted by submitting a later-dated proxy or by voting by ballot at the meeting. If you attend the meeting and wish to revoke your proxy, you must notify the meeting’s secretary in writing prior to the proxy voting. If any other matters or motions properly come before the meeting, including any matters dealing with the conduct of the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card intend to vote the proxy according to their judgment. The Board of Directors is not aware of any such matters other than those described in this proxy statement. Other Matters Any proposal that a qualified shareholder of the Company wishes to include in the Company’s proxy statement to be sent to shareholders in connection with the Company’s 20142016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders that is received by the Company after November 18, 2013December 1, 2015 will not be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting. To be included, proposals can be mailed to the Corporate Secretary at 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. To be a qualified shareholder, a shareholder must have owned at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s securities for at least one year before the date of the proposal’s submission to the Company. In compliance with the Company’s bylaws, shareholders must provide the Company with at least 60 days, but no more than 90 days, notice prior to an announced annual meeting date of (i) business the shareholder wishes to raise at the meeting and (ii) persons, if any, the shareholder wishes to nominate for election as directors at that meeting. The Board of Directors knows of no matters other than those set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders to come before the 20132015 Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, 10 directors are to be elected to the Board of Directors to hold office for a one-year term. The Board nominated the following persons: Sarah M. Barpoulis, Thomas A. Bracken, Keith S. Campbell, Victor A. Fortkiewicz, Edward J. Graham, Sheila Hartnett-Devlin, Walter M. Higgins III, Sunita Holzer, Joseph H. Petrowski, Michael J. Renna and Frank L. Sims. The Board of Directors currently consists of ten members. With the exception11 members, 10 of Directors Barpoulis and Sims, all nominees previously were elected by the Company’s shareholders, and all nomineeswhich are currently serving as directors. A third party search firm recommended Directors Barpoulis and Sims to the Board.nominees. We do not anticipate that, if elected, any of the nominees will be unable to serve. If any should be unable to accept the nomination or election, the persons designated as proxies on the proxy card may vote for a substitute nominee selected by the Board of Directors. In accordance with its Charter, the Governance Committee reviewed the education, experience, judgment, diversity and other applicable and relevant skills of each nominee, and determined that each nominee possesses skills and characteristics that support the Company’s strategic vision. The Governance Committee determined that the key areas of expertise include: accounting; corporate governance; enterprise leadership; political/governmental; human resources; legal; utility/energy;enterprise and/or risk management; executive compensation; finance/financial management; accounting;human resources; political/governmental; legal; and enterprise risk management.utility/energy. The Governance Committee concluded that the nominees and incumbent directors possess expertise and experience in these areas, and the Board approved the slate of nominees. The Governance Committee determined that Director Barpoulis’ areas of expertise include enterprise leadership, strategic/business planning, utility/energy, finance/financial management, tradable commodities, and energy and enterprise risk management. In addition, the Board determined that Director Barpoulis is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. She has also received a Certificate of Director Education from the National Association of Corporate Directors. Based on Ms. Barpoulis’their expertise and experience, in these areas, the Governance Committee determined that Ms. Barpoulisthe following directors should serve as a Directorbe elected for the 2013 – 20142015 - 2016 term.
| Sarah M. Barpoulis |  | Age: 50 Director since 2012 Owner of Interim Energy Solutions, LLC, Potomac, MD | Skills and Qualifications: Director Barpoulis’ areas of expertise include corporate governance, energy and enterprise risk management, enterprise leadership, executive compensation, finance/financial management, strategic/business planning, tradable commodities, and utility/energy industry. Director Barpoulis is a financial expert as defined by the SEC. She has also received a Certificate of Director Education from the National Association of Corporate Directors. | SJI Boards and Committees: The Governance Committee
Audit Committee determined that Director Bracken’s areas of expertise and experience include enterprise leadership, finance/financial management, enterprise risk management, and political/governmental. In addition, the Board determined that Director Bracken is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. Based on Mr. Bracken’s expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee determined that Mr. Bracken should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term. The Governance Committee determined that Director Campbell’s areas of expertise include enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, finance/financial management, human resources and sales/marketing. Based on Mr. Campbell’s expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee determined that Mr. Campbell should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Fortkiewicz’ areas of expertise include enterprise leadership, political/governmental, legal, environmental, enterprise risk management, and the utility/energy industry. Based on Mr. Fortkiewicz’ expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee determined that Mr. Fortkiewicz should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Graham’s areas of expertise include energy risk management, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, finance/financial management, regulatory, and the utility/energy industry. In addition, the Board determined that Director Graham is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. Having served as the Company’s CEO since 2005, Mr. Graham has significant knowledge regarding the Company’s business and structure. Based on Mr. Graham’s expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee concluded that Mr. Graham should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Hartnett-Devlin’s areas of expertise and experience include enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, and finance/financial management. In addition, the Board determined that Director Hartnett-Devlin is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. Based on Ms. Hartnett-Devlin’s expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee determined that Ms. Hartnett-Devlin should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Higgins’ areas of expertise include energy production, energy risk management, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, finance/financial management, human resources, and the utility/energy industry. In addition, the Board determined that Director Higgins is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. Based on Mr. Higgins’ expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee concluded that Mr. Higgins should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Holzer’s area of expertise include enterprise leadership, human resources, organizational development, succession planning and executive compensation. Based on Ms. Holzer’s expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee concluded that Ms. Holzer should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Petrowski’s areas of expertise include energy risk management, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, finance/financial management, sales/marketing and the utility/energy industry. In addition, the Board determined that Director Petrowski is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. Based on Mr. Petrowski’s expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee concluded that Mr. Petrowski should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
The Governance Committee determined that Director Sims’ areas of expertise include enterprise leadership, human resources, finance/financial management and enterprise risk management. In addition, the Board determined that Director Sims is a financial expert as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. Based on Mr. Sims’ expertise and experience in these areas, the Governance Committee concluded that Mr. Sims should serve as a Director for the 2013 – 2014 term.
Director Terms In 2009, the Shareholders approved a proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to require the annual election of each director. The Certificate was amended and commencing in 2012, all Directors stand for election annually and are elected for one-year terms.
NOMINEES
 | Sarah M. Barpoulis, age 48, has been a director since 2012. She is also a director of South Jersey Energy Company.Company
Executive Committee Member, SJI Midstream, LLC; South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC | Since 2003, Ms. Barpoulis is a member of the Governance Committee and the Audit Committee. Since 2003, she has provided asset management and advisory services to the merchant energy sector through Interim Energy Solutions, LLC, a company she founded. From 1991 to February 2003 she held several positions with PG&E National Energy Group, Inc., now known as National Energy & Gas Transmission, Inc., last serving as Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations and Trading in 2000. In July 2003, National Energy and certain of its affiliates voluntarily filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Maryland and emerged from bankruptcy in October 2004 to sell its major operating business units pursuant to its court-approved plan of reorganization.Trading. Ms. Barpoulis serves on the following boards: Director, SemGroup Corporation; Executive Committee Member, South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy, LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC; and was previously a director of Reliant Energy, Inc. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the above nominee.  | Thomas A. Brackenage 65, has been |  | Age: 67 Director since 2004 President, New Jersey Chamber of Commerce, Trenton, NJ | Skills and Qualifications: Director Bracken’s areas of expertise and experience include corporate governance, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, executive compensation, finance/financial management, and political/governmental. Director Bracken is a director since 2004. He is also a directorfinancial expert as defined by the SEC. | SJI Boards and Committees: Audit Committee Executive Committee Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility Committee Director of South Jersey Gas Company. Company | Mr. Bracken is a member of SJI’s Audit Committee, the Executive Committee and is chairman of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. He has served as president of the New Jersey Chamber of Commerce since February 2011; director, Roma Financial Corporation since 2004; president of TriState Capital Bank-New Jersey from January 2008 to February 2011; as president and CEO of Sun Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Sun National Bancorp, Inc., from 2001 to 2007; as executive director of the Public Sector Group, First Union Bank from 2000 to 2001; and, as executive vice president, head of Commercial and Governmental Banking for New Jersey, New York and Connecticut, First Union Bank from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Bracken is the:the former director of Rome Financial Corp.; former chairman, Economic Development Corporation of Trenton, Trenton, NJ; former chairman, New Jersey Chamber of Commerce; and former chairman, New Jersey Bankers Association. Currently, Mr. Bracken serves on the following boards: director and chairman, Finance Committee, Cancer Institute of N.J. Alliance for Action Foundation; director, New JerseyNJ Alliance for Action; director, Public Media NJ; director, Einsteins Alley;Rutgers Cancer Institute of N.J. Foundation; director, and secretary,Solix, Inc.; president, Bedens Brook Club.Club; member, advisory board, Investors Bankcorp. |
 | Keith S. Campbellage 58, has been a director |  | Age: 60 Director since 2000. He is also a director2000 Chairman of the Board, Mannington Mills, Inc., Salem, NJ | Skills and Qualifications: Director Campbell’s areas of expertise include corporate governance, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, executive compensation, finance/financial management, human resources and sales/marketing. | SJI Boards and Committees: Corporate Responsibility Committee Executive Committee Chairman of the Compensation Committee Director of South Jersey Energy Company. Mr. Campbell is a member of SJI’s Corporate Responsibility Committee, the Executive Committee and is chairman of the Compensation Committee. He has served as chairman of the board for Mannington Mills, Inc. since 1995. Mr. Campbell serves on the following boards: board member, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ; director, Skytop Lodge, Inc.; director, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia; Company Executive Committee Member, SJI Midstream, LLC; South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC. | | Mr. Campbell has served as chairman of the board for Mannington Mills, Inc. since 1995 and as director on the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia from 2008 to 2013. Mr. Campbell serves on the following boards: board member, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ; director, Skytop Lodge, Inc. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the above nominee.  | Victor A. Fortkiewiczage 61, has been a director |  | Age: 63 Director since 2010. He is also a director2010 Of Counsel, Cullen and Dykman, LLP, New York, NY | Skills and Qualifications: Director Fortkiewicz’ areas of expertise include corporate governance, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, legal, political/governmental, and the utility/energy industry. | SJI Boards and Committees: Corporate Responsibility Committee Governance Committee Director of South Jersey Gas Company. Company | Mr. Fortkiewicz is a member of SJI’s Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Governance Committee. He has been Of Counsel, Cullen and Dykman, LLP since October 2011. He served as executive director, New Jersey Board of Public Utilities from 2005 to 2010; as assistant counsel, Office of the Governor in 2005; and as president and director, NUI Utilities & Elizabethtown Gas Company from 2003 to 2004. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the above nominees.
| Sheila Hartnett-Devlin, CFA |  | |
Age: 56  Director since 1999 Senior Vice President, American Century Investments, New York, NY | Edward J. Graham, age 55, has beenSkills and Qualifications: Director Hartnett-Devlin’s areas of expertise and experience include corporate governance, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, executive compensation, and finance/financial management. Director Hartnett-Devlin is a director since 2004financial expert as defined by the SEC. | SJI Boards and has served as chairmanCommittees: Executive Committee Compensation Committee Chairman of the board since April 2005. He has been chairman of South Jersey Gas Company since April 2012. He is chairman of SJI’s Executive Committee. Mr. Graham has served as president and CEO of SJI since February 2004 and as President and CEO of South Jersey Gas Company from February 2004 to April 2012. He previously served as president of South Jersey Gas Company from 2003 to 2004; as presidentAudit Committee Director of South Jersey Energy Company from 2000 to 2003; as vice president of Executive Committee member, SJI from 2000 to 2001; as senior vice president, Energy Management, South Jersey Gas Company from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Graham serves on the following boards: member of the Economic Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia; director of Choose New Jersey; director, American Gas Association; director, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company; director, New Jersey Business & Industry Association; director, the United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey; director, Atlantic City Chamber of Commerce; director, Public Media NJ; serves on Drexel University’s Energy and Environment Council; member, William J. Hughes Center for Public Policy; and member, Lloyd Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality & Tourism. |
 | Sheila Hartnett-Devlin, CFA, age 54, has been a director since 1999. She is also a director ofMidstream, LLC; South Jersey Energy Company. Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC. | Ms. Hartnett-Devlin is a member of SJI’s Executive Committee, the Compensation Committee and is chairman of the Audit Committee. She has been vice president, American Century Investments since 2008 and senior vice president since 2011. She held several positionswas a managing director with Cohen, Klingenstein & Marks, Inc. including as managing director, from September 2005 to 2008; she held several positions with Fiduciary Trust Company International beginning in 1980: executive vice president from 1997 to 2004; senior vice president from 1991 to 1997; vice president from 1985 to 1991; and, chairman, Global Investment Committee from 1996 to 2004. She is a member of the NY Society of Security Analysts. She was also a member of the Investment Policy Committee of Fiduciary Trust Company International from 1995 to 2004. Ms. Hartnett-Devlin serves on the following boards: member, New York Society of Security Analysts; director, Mercy Investment Services, Inc.; member, Investment Committee; director, Mannington Mills, Inc.; |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the above nominee. | Walter M. Higgins III |  | Age: 70 Director since 2008 Director, President and CEO, Ascendant Group Ltd. and President and CEO, Bermuda Electric Light Company Ltd., Bermuda | Skills and Qualifications: Director Higgins’ areas of expertise include corporate governance, energy production, energy risk management, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, executive compensation, finance/financial management, human resources, and the utility/energy industry. Director Higgins is a financial expert as defined by the SEC. | SJI Boards and Committees: Executive Committee Audit Committee Chairman of the Governance Committee Lead Independent Director since 2010 Director of South Jersey Energy Company Executive Committee member,Member, SJI Midstream, LLC; South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC. |
 | Walter M. Higgins III, age 68, has been a director since 2008. He has been SJI’s Lead Independent Director since November 2010. He is also a director of South Jersey Energy Company. Mr. Higgins ishas served as a board member of SJI’s Executive Committee, Audit Committee and is chairman of the Governance Committee. He has been the Chief Executive OfficerPresident and PresidentCEO at Ascendant Group Ltd. since May 2012 and President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Bermuda Electric Light Company Limited since September 2012. He is the retired chairman, president, and CEO of Sierra Pacific Resources (now called NVEnergy). Mr. Higgins serves on the following boards:as a member of the board of AEGIS; AEGIS. |
| Sunita Holzer |  | Age: 53 Director since 2011 President, Human Capital insight, LLC. McLean, Virginia | Skills and Qualifications: Director Holzer’s area of expertise include corporate governance, enterprise leadership, executive compensation, human resources, organizational development, and succession planning. | SJI Boards and Committees: Compensation Committee Corporate Responsibility Committee Director of South Jersey Gas Company | | Ms. Holzer has served as president, Human Capital insight, LLC since June 2014. She served as executive vice president and chief human resources officer, CSC from June 2012 to May 2014; and served as executive vice president, chief human resources officer, Chubb Insurance Company from 2003 to June 2012. Ms. Holzer is an advisory board member, Re:Gender. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the above nominee. | Joseph H. Petrowski |  | Age: 61 Director since 2008 Managing Partner and Founder, Mercantor Partners, LLC, Framingham, MA | Skills and Qualifications: Director Petrowski’s areas of expertise include corporate governance, energy risk management, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, environmental, executive compensation, finance/financial management, sales/marketing and the utility/energy industry. Director Petrowski is a financial expert as defined by the SEC. | SJI Boards and Committees: Executive Committee Audit Committee Governance Committee Director of South Jersey Energy Company Chairman, South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC Executive Committee Member, SJI Midstream, LLC; South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the above nominees.
 | Sunita Holzer, age 51, has been a director since 2011. She is also a director of South Jersey Gas Company. Ms. Holzer is a member of SJI’s Compensation Committee and the Corporate Responsibility Committee. She has served as executive vice president and chief human resources officer, CSC since June 2012 and served as executive vice president, chief human resources officer, Chubb Insurance Company from 2003 – June 2012. Ms. Holzer is an advisory board member, National Council for Research on Women. |
 | Joseph H. Petrowski, age 58, has been a director since 2008. He is also a director of South Jersey Energy Company. He has been South Jersey Energy Solutions’ chairman since April 2012. Mr. Petrowski serves as a member of SJI’s Executive Committee,is the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee. He serves asformer CEO of the Gulf Oil/Cumberland Farms Groups. Mr. Petrowski serves on the following boards: board member, Financial Economics Instituteis a Trustee of Claremont McKenna College; board member, Gulf Acquisition, LLC; board member, Cumberland Farms, Inc.; Boston College High School and Trinity Catholic Academy. |
| Michael J. Renna |  | Age: 47 Director since 2014 President and COO, South Jersey Industries, Folsom, NJ | Skills and Qualifications: Director Renna’s areas of expertise include enterprise leadership; enterprise and/or risk management; finance/financial management; political/governmental; and utility/energy. | SJI Boards and Committees: Director of South Jersey Energy Company Executive Committee Member, SJI Midstream, LLC; South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC; Marina Energy LLC; South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC; and South Jersey Resources Group, LLC. | | Mr. Renna has been President and Chief Operating Officer of South Jersey Industries, Inc. since January 2014. He has served as President of South Jersey Energy Solutions since April 2011; as President of South Jersey Energy Company since 2004; as President of Marina Energy LLC since April 2011; as President of South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC since April 2007; as President of SJESP Plumbing Services, LLC since 2011; as President of South Jersey Resources Group, LLC since 2012; and as member of Executive Committee of Energenic-US, LLC since 2008. Mr. Renna previously served as Senior Vice President of South Jersey Industries, Inc. from January 2013 to January 2014; as Vice President of South Jersey Industries, Inc. from 2004 to 2013; as Chief Operating Officer of South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC from 2005 to 2011; as Vice President of SJESP Plumbing Services, LLC from 2007 to 2011; and as Vice President of South Jersey Resources Group, LLC from 2008 to 2010. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the above nominee.  | Frank L. Simsage 62, has been |  | Age: 64 Director since 2012 Retired, Corporate Vice President and Platform Leader, Cargill, Inc., Minneapolis, MN | Skills and Qualifications: Director Sims’ areas of expertise include corporate governance, enterprise leadership, enterprise risk management, executive compensation, finance/financial management, and human resources. Director Sims is a director since 2012. He is also a directorfinancial expert as defined by the SEC. | SJI Boards and Committees: Compensation Committee Audit Committee Director of South Jersey Gas Company. Company | Mr. Sims serves as a member of the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee. He has served as Board member, Piper Jaffray Co. since 2004; board member, PolyMet Mining Co. since 2008;from 2008 through July 2014; board member, Piper Jaffray Co. from 2004 to June 2013; chairman of board, The Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank (2005–2007) Minneapolis, MN;from 2005 to 2007; corporate vice president and platform leader, Cargill, Inc. (2002-2007) Minneapolis, MN.from 2002 to 2007. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the above nominees.
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | |
The Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures are designed to attract and retain highly qualified named executive officers while linking Company performance to named executive officer compensation which creates shareholder value. The Compensation Committee has a strong pay for performance philosophy; and, as a result, the compensation paid to our named executive officers is generally aligned with the Company’s performance on both a short-term and a long-term basis. Our performance over the last three10 years provides evidence that our executive compensation policies and procedures were effective in furthering these objectives. We have outperformed the S&P 500 index in foursix of the last six10 years, and we compare favorably to the S&P Utility index over the same period. We have alsoSJI has outperformed ourthe median of the Company’s peer group used to benchmark long-term incentive compensation in terms of total shareholder return in sixseven of the last ten years.then three-year cycles. For 2012,2014, the executive compensation policies and procedures for our named executive officers consisted of base salary, annual cash awards and long-term incentive compensation. The annual cash awards and long-term incentive compensation were again directly linked to the achievement of predefined short-term and long-term performance as follows: ● | Annual cash awards are paid based on both Company and individual performance, tied to earnings per share, financial performance of subsidiaries, and individual goals. |
Annual cash awards are paid based on both Company and individual performance, tied to earnings per share, financial performance of subsidiaries, and individual goals. ● | Long-term incentive compensation consists of performance-based restricted stock grants which are earned based on the Company’s relative total shareholder return and earnings per share growth, both measured against our peer group over a three-year period. |
Long-term incentive compensation consists of performance-based restricted stock grants which are earned based on the Company’s relative total shareholder return and earnings per share growth, both measured against our peer group over a 3-year period. We believe these components of compensation for our named executive officers provide the proper incentives to align compensation with the Company’s performance while enhancing shareholder value. Specifically, if the Company’s performance results meet or exceed pre-established performance targets, named executive officers have an opportunity to realize significant additional compensation through annual cash awards and long-term equity awards. In addition, the Company’s stock ownership guidelines require our named executive officers to own shares of Company stock which align with shareholder interests. We believe this pay for performance philosophy is integral to the Company’s performance and will drive shareholder value over the long term. Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2124 of this Proxy statement for a more detailed discussion of executive compensation policies and procedures for our named executive officers. Under SEC rules required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we are required to provide shareholders with a separate non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, the compensation tables, and any other narrative disclosure in this Proxy statement. Such a proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation policies and procedures as described in this proxy statement. Shareholders may also abstain from voting. Accordingly, shareholders are being asked to approve the following non-binding resolution: “RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulations S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.” Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the Board. However, the Compensation Committee values the opinions expressed by shareholders and expects to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the non-binding resolution approving the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationsRegulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion. PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE 2015 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN | |
General On January 23, 2015, our Board of Directors adopted, subject to approval by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the South Jersey Industries, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2015 Plan” or the “Plan”). Our Board of Directors has directed that the proposal to approve the Plan be submitted to our shareholders for their approval at the Annual Meeting. Shareholder approval is being sought (i) in order to meet the New York Stock Exchange listing requirements, (ii) so that compensation attributable to awards under the Plan may qualify for an exemption from the deduction limit under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Code”) (see discussion of “Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Plan” below), and (iii) in order for incentive stock options to meet the requirements of the Code. Our 1997 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (the “1997 Plan”), terminated on January 26, 2015 by its terms. Our Board of Directors believes it is advisable to adopt a new comprehensive incentive compensation plan that will serve as the successor incentive compensation plan to the 1997 Plan and provide the Company with an omnibus plan to design and structure awards of stock awards, stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalents, other stock-based awards and cash incentive awards for selected individuals in our employ or service. Our Board of Directors believes that the availability of 1,200,000 new shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2015 Plan will ensure that we continue to have a sufficient number of shares available to achieve our compensation strategy. The material terms of the 2015 Plan are summarized below. A copy of the full text of the 2015 Plan is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A. This summary of the 2015 Plan is not intended to be a complete description of the 2015 Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the 2015 Plan to which reference is made. If approved by our shareholders, the 2015 Plan will become effective on the date of the Annual Meeting. Description of The Plan Types of Awards The Plan provides that awards may be made in any of the following forms: Nonqualified stock options Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) Shares Subject to the Plan The Plan authorizes a number of shares of our common stock for issuance equal to 1,200,000 new shares, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances as described below. The Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which awards may be made to any individual during any calendar year is 200,000 shares, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances as described below. The Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which awards may be made to any non-employee director during any calendar year is 10,000 shares, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances as described below. If dividend equivalents are granted, a grantee may not accrue more than $1,000,000 of such dividend equivalents during any calendar year. If and to the extent options and SARs granted under the Plan terminate, expire or are cancelled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without being exercised or if any stock awards, stock units, or other stock-based awards are forfeited, terminated or otherwise not paid in full, the shares subject to such awards will become available again for purposes of the Plan. To the extent that awards are to be paid in cash and not in shares of our common stock, such awards will not count against the share limits set forth above. Shares surrendered in payment of the exercise price of an option and shares withheld or surrendered for payment of taxes will not be available again for issuance or transfer under the Plan. Additionally, if SARs are exercised, the full number of shares subject to the SARs will be considered issued under the Plan, without regard to the number of shares issued upon settlement of the SARs. Term of Plan The Plan will terminate on the day immediately preceding the tenth anniversary of its effective date, unless sooner terminated by the Board of Directors. Administration The Plan will be administered and interpreted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or another committee appointed by the Board of Directors to administer the Plan (the “Committee”). Administrative functions may be performed by officers of the Company appointed by the Committee. The Committee has the authority to make recommendations regarding (i) the individuals to whom awards will be made under the Plan, (ii) the type, size, terms and conditions of the awards, (iii) when awards will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability, (iv) any restrictions on resale applicable to the shares of our common stock to be issued or transferred pursuant to an award, (v) whether any award shall be subject to any non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality, clawback or other covenant or conditions, (vi) amendment of the terms and conditions of any previously issued award, subject to the limitations described below, and (vii) or any other matters arising under the Plan. The Committee presently consists of four members, each of whom is a non-employee member of our Board of Directors. The Committee’s recommendations are presented to the full Board for consideration. Only the non-employee Directors act on the Committee recommendations with regard to the Plan. Eligibility All of our employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors who perform services for us and our subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the Plan. As of March 2, 2015, approximately 50 persons are eligible as employees and non-employee directors to receive awards under the Plan. The Board is authorized to select the persons to receive awards from among those eligible and will determine the number of shares of our common stock that are subject to each award. Vesting The Board determines the vesting of awards granted under the Plan. Awards shall be subject to vesting over a period of not less than one year, subject to the following provisions as may be determined by the Board: (i) vesting of awards may be accelerated in connection with a grantee’s death or disability, or in the event of a change in control; and (ii) an award agreement for a non-employee director may include vesting over a period of less than one year and/or accelerated vesting in connection with the non-employee director’s retirement. Types of Awards Stock Awards The Board may grant stock awards to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan, upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate. The Board may require that grantees pay consideration for the stock awards and may impose restrictions on the stock awards. The Board will determine whether they will lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria, including the achievement of specific performance goals, as the Board determines. The Board will determine the number of shares of our common stock subject to the grant of stock awards and the other terms and conditions of the award including whether the grantee will have the right to vote shares of our common stock and to receive dividends paid on such shares during the restriction period. Unless the Board determines otherwise, all unvested stock awards are forfeited if the grantee’s employment or service is terminated for any reason. Stock Units The Board may grant stock units to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. Each stock unit provides the grantee with the right to receive a share of our common stock or an amount based on the value of a share of our common stock at a future date upon the Company’s achievement of performance goals established by the Board. The Board will determine the number of stock units that will be granted and the terms and conditions applicable to stock units, which will include payment based on achievement of specified performance goals. Stock units may be paid at the end of a specified period or deferred to a date authorized by the Board. If a stock unit becomes payable, it will be paid to the grantee in cash, in shares of our common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, as determined by the Board. All unvested stock units are forfeited if the grantee’s employment or service is terminated for any reason, unless the Board determines otherwise. The Board may grant dividend equivalents in connection with awards of stock units made under the plan. Dividend equivalents entitle the grantee to receive amounts equal to ordinary dividends that are paid on the shares underlying an award while the award is outstanding. The Board will determine whether dividend equivalents will be paid currently or credited to a bookkeeping account as a dollar amount or in the form of stock units. The Board may provide that dividend equivalents shall be payable based on the achievement of specific performance goals. Dividend equivalents may be paid in cash, in shares of our common stock, or in a combination of the two. The terms and conditions of dividend equivalents will be determined by the Board. Stock Options The Board may grant options intended to qualify as incentive stock options within the meaning of section 422 of the Code (“ISOs”) or “nonqualified stock options” that are not intended to so qualify (“NQSOs”) or any combination of ISOs and NQSOs. Anyone eligible to participate in the Plan may receive an award of NQSOs. Only our employees and employees of our subsidiaries may receive an award of ISOs. The maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted under the Plan is 1,200,000, subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Board will fix the exercise price per share of options on the date of grant. The exercise price of options granted under the Plan will not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. However, if the grantee of an ISO is a person who holds more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock, the exercise price per share of an ISO granted to such person must be at least 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The Board will determine the term of each option, which will not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the grantee of an ISO is a person who holds more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock, the term of the ISO may not exceed five years from the date of grant. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of shares of our common stock, determined on the date of grant, with respect to which ISOs become exercisable for the first time by a grantee during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such ISOs will be treated as NQSOs. The Board will determine the terms and conditions of options, including when they become exercisable. The Board may accelerate the exercisability of any options, subject to the vesting restriction described above. Except as provided in the award agreement or as otherwise determined by the Board, an option may only be exercised while a grantee is employed by or providing service to us or our subsidiaries. A grantee may exercise an option by delivering notice of exercise to us. The grantee will pay the exercise price and any withholding taxes for the option: (i) in cash; (ii) in certain circumstances as permitted by the Board, by the surrender of shares of our common stock with an aggregate fair market value on the date the option is exercised equal to the exercise price; (iii) by payment through a broker in accordance with the procedures permitted by Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board; (iv) if permitted by the Board, by surrender of the vested portion of the option to us for an appreciation distribution payable in shares of our common stock with a fair market value at the time of the option surrender equal to the dollar amount by which the then fair market value of the shares of our common stock subject to the surrendered portion exceeds the aggregate exercise price; (v) by another method approved by the Board; or (vi) by any combination of the foregoing. SARs The Board may grant SARs to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. SARs may be granted in connection with, or independently of, any option granted under the Plan. Upon exercise of a SAR, the grantee will be paid an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the base amount for the SAR. Such payment to the grantee will be in cash, in shares of common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of common stock, as determined by the Board. The Board will determine the term of each SAR, which will not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. The base amount of each SAR will be determined by the Board and will be equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on the date the SAR is granted. The Board will determine the terms and conditions of SARs, including when they become exercisable. The Board may accelerate the exercisability of any SARs, subject to the vesting restrictions described above. Other Stock-Based Awards The Board may grant other stock-based awards, which are awards other than options, stock units, stock awards, SARs and cash incentive awards. The Board may grant other stock-based awards to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. These awards will be based on or measured by shares of our common stock, and will be payable in cash, in shares of our common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. The terms and conditions for other stock-based awards will be determined by the Board. Cash Incentive Awards The Board may grant cash incentive awards, which are awards to be settled solely in cash. The terms and conditions for cash incentive awards will be determined by the Board. Qualified Performance-Based Compensation The Plan permits the Board to impose objective performance goals that must be met with respect to awards of stock units, stock awards, other stock-based awards or dividend equivalents granted to employees under the Plan, in order for the awards to be considered qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code (see “Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Plan” below). Prior to, or soon after the beginning of, the performance period, the Board will establish in writing the performance goals that must be met, the applicable performance period, the amounts to be paid if the performance goals are met and any other conditions. The performance goals, to the extent designed to meet the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code, will be based on one or more of the following measures: annual consolidated earnings per share; the price of shares of common stock; the market share of the Company (or any business unit thereof); sales by the Company (or any business unit thereof); return factors (including, but not limited to return on equity, capital employed, or investment; risk adjusted return on capital; return on investors’ capital; return on average equity; return on assets; and return on net assets); costs of the Company (or any business unit thereof); the Company’s total shareholder return; revenues; debt level; cash flow; capital expenditures; net income or gross income; operating income; expenses; net borrowing; goals related to mergers, acquisitions, dispositions or similar business transactions; assets; regulatory compliance; employee retention/attrition rates; individual business objectives; risk management activities; corporate value measures which may be objectively determined (including ethics, compliance, environmental, diversity commitment and safety); or implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; cost reduction targets; interest-sensitivity gap levels; weighted average cost of capital; working capital; operating or profit margin; pre-tax margin; contribution margin; book value; operating expenses (including, but not limited to lease operating expenses, severance taxes and other production taxes, gathering and transportation and general and administrative costs); unit costs; EBIT; EBITDA; debt to EBIT or EBITDA; interest coverage; comparative shareholder return; book value per share; net asset value per share; growth measures; debt to total capitalization ratio; asset quality levels; investments; economic value added; stock price appreciation; market capitalization; accounts receivables day sales outstanding; accounts receivables to sales; achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives; assets; asset sale targets; non-performing assets; satisfactory internal or external audits; improvement of financial ratings; charge-offs; amount of the gas reserves; costs of finding gas reserves; reserve replacement ratio, reserve additions, or other reserve level measures; drilling results; natural gas production, production and reserve growth; production volume; sales volume; production efficiency; inventory to sales; and inventory turns; and to the extent that the performance goal is not designed to meet the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code, the goal may be established at the discretion of the Board. Such performance goals may be particular to a grantee or the division, department, branch, line of business, subsidiary or other unit in which the grantee works, or may be based on attaining a specified absolute level of the performance goal, or a percentage increase or decrease in the performance goal compared to a pre-established target, previous years’ results, or a designated market index or comparison group, all as determined by the Board. Deferrals The Board may permit or require grantees to defer receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of shares of our common stock that would otherwise be due to the grantee in connection with any awards under the Plan. The Board will establish the rules and procedures applicable to any such deferrals, consistent with the applicable requirements under the Code relating to deferrals. Adjustment Provisions If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of our common stock outstanding by reason of (i) a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split or combination or exchange of shares, (ii) a merger, reorganization or consolidation, (iii) a reclassification or change in par value, or (iv) any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding shares of our common stock as a class without the Company’s receipt of consideration, or if the value of outstanding shares of our common stock is substantially reduced as a result of a spinoff or our payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the maximum number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the Plan, the maximum number of shares of our common stock for which any individual may receive awards in any year as described above, the kind and number of shares covered by outstanding awards, the kind and number of shares issued or transferred and to be issued or transferred under the Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such grants will be equitably adjusted by the Board to reflect any increase or decrease in the number of, or change in the kind or value of, the issued shares of our common stock to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of rights and benefits under the Plan and such outstanding awards. Any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment will be eliminated. In addition, in the event of a change in control, the provisions applicable to a change in control, described below, will apply. Any adjustments to outstanding awards will be consistent with section 409A or 424 of the Code, to the extent applicable. Transferability Only the grantee may exercise rights under an award during the grantee’s lifetime. A grantee may not transfer those rights except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. The Board may also provide, in an award agreement, that a grantee may transfer NQSOs to his or her family members, or one or more trusts or other entities for the benefit of or owned by such family members, consistent with applicable securities laws, according to such terms as the Board may determine. Change in Control In the event of a change in control where the Company is not the surviving corporation (or survives only as a subsidiary of another corporation), unless the Board determines otherwise, all outstanding awards not previously exercised or paid will be assumed by, or replaced with awards that have comparable terms by, the surviving corporation (or a parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation). Unless the award agreement provides otherwise, if a grantee’s employment is terminated by the Company without “Cause” or the grantee resigns for “Good Reason” (as such terms are defined in the Plan), in either case within 12 months following a change in control, the grantee’s outstanding awards will become fully vested on the date of the termination, except that if the vesting of any such awards is based, in whole or in part, on performance, the applicable award agreement will specify how the portion of the award that becomes vested under this paragraph will be calculated. In the alternative, in the event of a change in control, if all outstanding awards are not assumed by, or replaced with awards that have comparable terms by, the successor corporation (or parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation), the Board may take any of the following actions with respect to any or all outstanding awards, without the consent of any grantee: Determine that outstanding options and SARs automatically accelerate and become fully exercisable and the restrictions and conditions on outstanding stock awards immediately lapse; Determine that grantees receive a payment in settlement of outstanding stock units or other stock-based awards, in such amount and form as determined by the Board; Require that grantees surrender their options and SARs in exchange for payment by the Company, in cash or shares of our common stock as determined by the Board, in an amount equal to the amount, if any, by which the then fair market value of the shares subject to the grantee’s unexercised options and SARs exceeds the exercise price of the stock options or the base amount of the SARs, as applicable; or After giving grantees the opportunity to exercise their options and SARs, terminate any or all unexercised options and SARs at such time as the Board deems appropriate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the per share fair market value of our common stock does not exceed the exercise price or base amount, as applicable, the Company will not be required to make any payment to the grantee upon surrender of the option or SAR. For purposes of the Plan, a change in control will generally be deemed to have occurred if one of the following events occurs: Consummation of (i) a merger or consolidation as a result of which our stockholders immediately before the transaction do not own more than 50% of the voting power of the voting securities of the surviving company; or (ii) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets; If at least a majority of the Board of Directors at any time does not consist of individuals who were members of the Board of Directors for at least two years, unless each such new director who was not a director at the beginning of such two year period stands for election as a management nominee (which does not include directors nominated by hostile shareholders) and is elected by shareholders immediately prior to the election of any such new majority; or Any person becomes the beneficial owner of securities representing more than 30% of the voting power of our securities, provided that a change in control will not be deemed to occur as a result of (i) a transaction in which we become a subsidiary of another corporation and in which our stockholders, immediately prior to the transaction, will beneficially own, immediately after the transaction, shares entitling such stockholders to more than 30% of all votes to which all stockholders of the parent corporation would be entitled in the election of directors (without consideration of the rights of any class of stock to elect directors by a separate class vote) or (ii) an increase on an person’s beneficial ownership of our securities in connection with one or more Company stock repurchase transactions. For any awards subject to the requirements of section 409A of the Code (discussed below) that will become payable on a change in control, the transaction constituting a change in control must also constitute a change in control event for purposes of section 409A of the Code. Amendment and Termination of the Plan Our Board of Directors may amend or terminate the Plan or an award at any time, however, the Board of Directors may not amend the Plan without shareholder approval if such approval is required under any applicable laws or stock exchange requirements. Grantees Outside of the United States If any individual who receives an award under the Plan is subject to taxation in a country other than the United States, the Board may make the award on such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate to comply with the laws of the applicable country. No Repricing Except as set forth in the Plan, the Company cannot, without shareholder approval, (i) amend the price of outstanding options or SARs under the Plan to reduce the exercise price, (ii) cancel outstanding options or SARs in exchange for other awards of options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original options or SARs, or (iii) cancel outstanding options or SARs with an exercise price above the current stock price in exchange for cash or other securities. Clawback Policy All awards made under the Plan are subject to any compensation, share trading, clawback, recoupment or other policy that may be applicable to employees of the Company, as such policy may be in effect from time to time, whether or not approved before or after the effective date of the Plan. Shareholder Approval for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation If stock awards, stock units, other stock-based awards or dividend equivalents are granted as qualified performance-based compensation under section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan must be re-approved by our shareholders no later than the first shareholders meeting that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which our shareholders previously approved the Plan. Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to Awards The federal income tax consequences of awards under the Plan will depend on the type of award. The following description provides only a general description of the application of federal income tax laws to awards under the Plan. This discussion is intended for the information of shareholders considering how to vote at the Annual Meeting and not as tax guidance to grantees, as the consequences may vary with the types of awards made, the identity of the grantees and the method of payment or settlement. The summary does not address the effects of other federal taxes (including possible “golden parachute” excise taxes) or taxes imposed under state, local or foreign tax laws. From the grantees’ standpoint, as a general rule, ordinary income will be recognized at the time of delivery of shares of our common stock or payment of cash under the Plan. Future appreciation on shares of our common stock held beyond the ordinary income recognition event will be taxable as capital gain when the shares of our common stock are sold. The tax rate applicable to capital gain will depend upon how long the grantee holds the shares. We, as a general rule, will be entitled to a tax deduction that corresponds in time and amount to the ordinary income recognized by the grantee, and we will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to capital gain income recognized by the grantee. Exceptions to these general rules arise under the following circumstances: (i) If shares of our common stock, when delivered, are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture by reason of any employment or performance-related condition, ordinary income taxation and our tax deduction will be delayed until the risk of forfeiture lapses, unless the grantee makes a special election to accelerate taxation under section 83(b) of the Code. (ii) If an employee exercises a stock option that qualifies as an ISO, no ordinary income will be recognized, and we will not be entitled to any tax deduction, if shares of our common stock acquired upon exercise of the stock option are held until the later of (A) one year from the date of exercise and (B) two years from the date of grant. However, if the employee disposes of the shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before satisfying both holding period requirements, the employee will recognize ordinary income at the time of the disposition equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or the amount realized on the disposition, if less) and the exercise price, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in that amount. The gain, if any, in excess of the amount recognized as ordinary income will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon the length of time the employee held the shares before the disposition. (iii) An award may be subject to a 20% tax, in addition to ordinary income tax, at the time the award becomes vested, plus interest, if the award constitutes deferred compensation under section 409A of the Code and the requirements of section 409A of the Code are not satisfied Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a publicly held corporation’s tax deduction for compensation paid to its chief executive officer or certain other officers in excess of $1 million in any year. Qualified performance-based compensation is excluded from the $1 million deductibility limit, and therefore remains fully deductible by the corporation that pays it. We intend that options and SARs granted under the Plan will be qualified performance-based compensation. Stock units, stock awards, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards granted under the Plan may be structured to meet the qualified performance-based compensation exception under section 162(m) of the Code if the Board determines to condition such awards on the achievement of specific performance goals in accordance with the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code. We have the right to require that grantees pay to us an amount necessary for us to satisfy our federal, state or local tax withholding obligations with respect to awards. We may withhold from other amounts payable to a grantee an amount necessary to satisfy these obligations. The Board may permit a grantee to satisfy our withholding obligation with respect to awards paid in shares of our common stock by having shares withheld, at the time the awards become taxable, provided that the number of shares withheld does not exceed the individual’s minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal, state and local tax liabilities. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting for the holders of our common stock is required to approve the adoption of the South Jersey Industries, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. No award has been or will be granted under the Plan that is contingent upon approval of this proposal by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting. Awards under the Plan are discretionary, so it is not currently possible to predict the number of shares of our common stock that will be granted or who will receive grants under the Plan after the Annual Meeting. The last reported sale price of a share of our common stock on March 2, 2015 was $55.89 per share. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the adoption of the South Jersey Industries, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
PROPOSAL 4 RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS | |
The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors, subject to the approval of the shareholders, reappointed Deloitte & Touche LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013.2015. Unless otherwise directed, proxies will be voted “FOR” approval of this appointment. If the shareholders do not ratify this appointment by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, other auditors will be considered by the Audit Committee. Deloitte & Touche LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm during 2012.2014. During 2012,2014, the audit services performed for the Company consisted of audits of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ financial statements and attestation of management’s assessment of internal control, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 404 and the preparation of various reports based on those audits, services related to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, and audits of employee benefit plans as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if such representative desires to do so, and to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP | The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of February 19, 2013,March 2, 2015, of: (a) each current director and nominee for director; (b) our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, the three other most highly compensated executive officers during 20122014 (collectively, the “Named Executives”Executive Officers”); and (c) all of the directors and Named Executivesexecutive officers as a group.
| | Number of Shares of Common Stock (1) | | | Percent of Class | | | Ann T. Anthony | | | 227 | | | | | * | | Sarah M. Barpoulis | | | 5,145 | (2) | | | | * | | Thomas A. Bracken | | | 21,913 | (2) | | | | * | | Keith S. Campbell | | | 18,182 | (2) | | | | * | | Stephen H. Clark | | | 13,107 | | | | | * | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 15,542 | | | | | * | | Victor A. Fortkiewicz | | | 8,879 | (2) | | | | * | | Edward J. Graham | | | 48,908 | | | | | * | | Sheila Hartnett-Devlin | | | 4,062 | (2) | | | | * | | Walter M. Higgins III | | | 10,483 | (2) | | | | * | | Sunita Holzer | | | 6,593 | (2) | | | | * | | David A. Kindlick | | | 20,430 | | | | | * | | Kenneth Lynch | | | 2,598 | | | | | * | | Kathleen A. McEndy | | | 429 | | | | | * | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 6,015 | | | | | * | | Gregory M. Nuzzo | | | 949 | | | | | * | | Joseph H. Petrowski | | | 14,728 | (2) | | | | * | | Michael J. Renna | | | 24,868 | | | | | * | | David Robbins, Jr. | | | 9,704 | | | | | * | | Frank L. Sims | | | 29,146 | (2) | | | | * | | All directors, nominees for director and executive officers as a group (20 persons) | | | 261,908 | | | | | |
| | | Number of Shares | | | | | | | | | of Common Stock (1) | | | | Percent of Class | | | | | | | | | | | | Sarah M. Barpoulis | | | 2,365 | | | | | * | | | Thomas A. Bracken | | | 18,463 | | (2) | | | * | | | Keith S. Campbell | | | 14,578 | | (2) | | | * | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 21,825 | | | | | * | | | Victor A. Fortkiewicz | | | 5,907 | | (2) | | | * | | | Edward J. Graham | | | 48,954 | | | | | * | | | Sheila Hartnett-Devlin | | | 5,659 | | (2) | | | * | | | Walter M. Higgins III | | | 7,281 | | (2) | | | * | | | Sunita Holzer | | | 3,708 | | (2) | | | * | | | David A. Kindlick | | | 61,007 | | | | | * | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 2,899 | | | | | * | | | Joseph H. Petrowski | | | 8,531 | | (2) | | | * | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 24,049 | | | | | * | | | Frank L. Sims | | | 3,365 | | (2) | | | * | | | All directors, nominees for director and executive officers as a group (14 persons) | | | 228,591 | | | | | 1 | % |
* Less than 1%. Notes: | (1) | Based on information furnished by the Company’s directors and executive officers. UnlessotherwiseUnless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the Common Stock shown as owned by him or her. |
| (2) | Includes shares awarded to each director under a Restricted Stock Program for Directors. |
Stock Ownership Requirements The Board of Directors believes significant ownership of Company Common Stock better aligns the interests of management with that of the Company’s shareholders. Therefore, in 2001, the Board of Directors enacted the following stock ownershiprequirements listed below for officers and directors. The requirements for officers were effective through 2014 and directors: ● | The Chief Executive Officer is required to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of three times his or her annual base salary; |
● | Other executive officers are required to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of one and one-half times their annual base salary; |
● | Other officers are required to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of their annual base salary; |
have been increased for 2015 as outlined on page 33 of this proxy statement. The Chief Executive Officer is required to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of three times his or her annual base salary; ● | Shares owned outright will be combined with vested restricted shares awarded under the Stock-Based Compensation Plan and vested shares beneficially owned through any employee benefit plan for purposes of determining compliance with the stock ownership requirement for officers. Current officers will have a period of six years from the original date of adoption and newly elected or promoted officers will have a period of six years following their election or promotion to a new position to meet these minimum stock ownership requirements; and |
Other executive officers are required to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of one and one-half times their annual base salary; Other officers are required to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of their annual base salary; ● | Members of the Board of Directors are required, within six years of becoming a director of the Company or any of its principal subsidiaries, to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of five times the current value of a Director’s annual cash retainer for board service. Shares owned outright will be combined with restricted shares awarded as part of the annual stock retainer for the purpose of meeting these requirements. |
Shares owned outright will be combined with vested restricted shares awarded under the Stock-Based Compensation Plan and vested shares beneficially owned through any employee benefit plan for purposes of determining compliance with the stock ownership requirement for officers. Current officers will have a period of six years from the original date of adoption and newly elected or promoted officers will have a period of six years following their election or promotion to a new position to meet these minimum stock ownership requirements; and Members of the Board of Directors are required, within six years of becoming a director of the Company or any of its principal subsidiaries, or within six years of an increase in the share ownership guidelines, to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of five times the current value of a Director’s annual cash retainer for board service. Shares owned outright will be combined with restricted shares awarded as part of the annual stock retainer for the purpose of meeting these requirements. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requires the Company’s directors and executive officers to file reports with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC relating to their ownership of, and transactions in, the Company’s Common Stock. In 2012, Edward G. Graham and executive officer Kevin D. Patrick inadvertently filed untimely reports of beneficial ownership on Form 4. Based on our records and other information, the Company believes that all other Section 16(a) filing requirements were met for 2012.2014. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners The following table sets forth certain information, as of February 19, 2013,March 2, 2015, as to each person known to the Company, based on filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, who beneficially owns 5%5 percent or more of the Company’s Common Stock. Based on filings made with the SEC, each shareholder named below has sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares. | Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Shares Beneficially Owned | | | Percent of Class | | | Black Rock Inc. | | | 2,377,363 | | | | 7.6 | % | | 40 East 52nd Street | | | | | | | | | | New York, NY 10022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Vanguard Group Inc. | | | 2,113,817 | | | | 6.76 | % | | 100 Vanguard Blvd. | | | | | | | | | | Malvern, PA 19355 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Neuberger Berman Group LLC | | | 2,081,576 | | | | 6.658 | % | | 605 Third Avenue | | | | | | | | | | New York, NY 10158 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | EARNEST Partners, LLC | | | 1,609,110 | | | | 5.1 | % | | 1180 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2300 | | | | | | | | | | Atlanta, GA 30309 | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Shares Beneficially Owned | | Percent of Class | BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022 | | | 3,201,312 | | 9.50 percent | | | | | | | The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355 | | | 2,310,135 | | 6.86 percent |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSDIRECTORS Leadership Structure The Chairman of the Board, Edward J. Graham, also serves as the Company’s CEO. The Company determined that this leadership structure is appropriate based on Mr. Graham’s tenure with the Company, his knowledge of the Company and the energy and utility industries, and his excellent relationship with the Board. Mr. Graham joined the Company as an Internal Auditor in 1981 and since that time has held various significant positions, including positions in accounting and gas management. He has also served as Vice President and President of the Company and its subsidiaries. As a result of his tenure and broad base of expertise, Mr. Graham successfully directs the Board as it advises management and monitors performance.
To ensure sustained leadership when it is inappropriate for Mr. Graham to act as Chairman, the Board elected Director Higgins to serve as Lead Independent Director in April 2012.2013. The Lead Independent Director is an independent memberIn December 2014, SJI announced that Mr. Graham will retire effective April 30, 2015, with Michael J. Renna assuming the role of president and CEO as of May 1, 2015. Walter M. Higgins III will become the Non-Executive Chairman of SJI’s board of directors on May 1, 2015.
In the role, Mr. Higgins will: Provide leadership to the Board Chair meetings of the Board elected annually by a majority of Directors Establish procedures to govern the independent directors. The Lead Independent Director presides over allBoard’s work Ensure the Board’s full discharge of its duties Schedule meetings of the Board’s independentfull Board and work with committee chairmen, CEO and Corporate Secretary for the schedule of meetings for committees Organize and present the agenda for regular or special Board meetings based on input from directors, CEO and Corporate Secretary Ensure proper flow of information to the Board, reviewing adequacy and timing of documentary materials in support of management’s proposals Ensure adequate lead time for effective study and discussion of business under consideration Help the Board fulfill the goals it sets by assigning specific tasks to members of the Board Identify guidelines for the conduct of the directors, and non-management directors. The Board convenes an executive session of the independent directors atensure that each meeting. The Lead Independent Director consults with the Chairman on agenda matters fordirector is making a significant contribution Act as liaison between the Board and aidsCEO Work with Governance Committee and assistsCEO, and ensure proper committee structure, including assignments and committee chairmen Set and monitor the Chair and the remainderethical tone of the Board in assuring effectiveof Directors Manage conflicts which may arise with respect to the Board Monitor how the Board functions and works together effectively Carry out other duties as requested by the CEO and Board as a whole, depending on need and circumstances Serve as resource to the CEO, Corporate Secretary and other Board members on corporate governance in managing the affairs of the Boardprocedure and the Company. The Lead Independent Director functions in an advisory capacity to, and works closely with, the Chair on issues related to the Board.policies Independence of Directors The Board adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that require the Board to be composed of a majority of directors who are “independent directors” as defined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. No director will be considered “independent” unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company. When making “independence” determinations, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, as well as any other facts and considerations specified by the New York Stock Exchange, by law or by any rule or regulation of any other regulatory body or self-regulatory body applicable to the Company. As a part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board established a policy that Board members may not serve on more than four other boards of publicly traded companies. SJI’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors”. The Board determined that directors Barpoulis, Bracken, Campbell, Fortkiewicz, Hartnett-Devlin, Higgins, Holzer, Petrowski and Sims, constituting all of the non-employee directors, meet the New York Stock Exchange standards and our own standards noted above for independence and are, therefore, considered to be independent directors. Accordingly, during 2012,2014, all but onetwo of the Company’s directors waswere considered to be “independent.” Mr. Graham isand Mr. Renna are not considered independent by virtue of histheir employment with the Company. Codes of Conduct The Company adopted codes of conduct for all employees, officers and directors, which include the code of ethics for our principal executive, our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer within the meaning of the SEC regulations adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, the Company established a hotline and website for employees to anonymously report suspected violations. A copyCopies of the codes of ethics isare available on the Company’s website at www.sjindustries.com under Investors > Corporate Governance. Copies of our codes of conduct are also available at no cost to any shareholder who requests them in writing at South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Communication with Directors The independent directors met fourfive times during 2012.2014. Topics of these independent sessions included CEO and officer performance and compensation, succession planning, strategy and discussions of corporate governance. Director Higgins, the Lead Independent Director, chaired the meetings of the independent directors. You may communicate with the Lead Independent Director and chairmen of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Responsibility and Governance Committees by sending an e-mail to leadindependentdirector@sjindustries.com, auditchair@sjindustries.com, compchair@sjindustries.com, govchair@sjindustries.com, or corpresp@sjindustries.com, respectively, or you may communicate with our outside independent directors as a group by sending an e-mail to sjidirectors@sjindustries.com. The charters and scope of responsibility for each of the Company’s committees are located on the Company’s website at www.sjindustries.com. You may also address any correspondence to the chairmen of the committees or to the independent directors at South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. Corporate Governance Materials Shareholders can see the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Profile, Charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Responsibility Committee, Executive Committee and Governance Committee, and Codes of Ethics on the Company’s website at www.sjindustries.com under Investors > Corporate Governance. Copies of these documents, as well as additional copies of this Proxy Statement, are available to shareholders without charge upon request to the Corporate Secretary at South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. MEETINGS OF THE BOARDBOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES The Board of Directors met seveneight times in 2012.2014. Each director attended 75%75 percent or more of the total number of Board meetings and the Board committee meetings on which he or she served. All current Board members and all nominees for election to the Company’s Board of Directors are required to attend the Company’s annual meetingsAnnual Meetings of stockholders.Shareholders. Attendance is not required if personal circumstances affecting the Board member or director nominee make his or her attendance impracticable or inappropriate. All of the directors attended the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. During 2012,2014, each of the Company’s directors also served on the Boards or Executive Committees of one or more of South Jersey Gas Company, South Jersey Energy Company, South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC, Marina Energy LLC, South Jersey Resources Group, LLC, South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC, Energy & Minerals, Inc. and, R&T Group, Inc., and SJI Midstream, LLC, all of which are Company subsidiaries. There are five standing committees of the Board: the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; the Corporate Responsibility Committee; the Executive Committee; and the Governance Committee. Audit Committee The Board’s Audit Committee, which met teneight times during 2012,2014, was comprised of four “independent” directors through April 2012, and six “independent” directors for the remainder of 2012:in 2014: Sheila Hartnett-Devlin,Hartnett-Devlin, Chairman; Sarah M. Barpoulis (May - December 2012);Barpoulis; Thomas A. Bracken; Walter M. Higgins III; Joseph H. Petrowski; and Frank L. Sims (May - December 2012).Sims. The Board determined that no member of the Audit Committee has a material relationship that would jeopardize such member’s ability to exercise independent judgment. The Board of Directors designated each member of the Audit Committee as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations. The Audit Committee: (1) annually engages an independent registered public accounting firm for appointment, subject to Board and shareholder approval, as auditors of the Company and has the authority to unilaterally retain, compensate and terminate the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; (2) reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the scope and results of each annual audit; (3) reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm, the Company’s internal auditors and management, the quality and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget, and staffing; and (4) considers the possible effect on the objectivity and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm of any non-audit services to be rendered to the Company. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing the Company’s Risk Management process. The Committee analyzes the guidelines and policies that management uses to assess and manage exposure to risk, and analyzes major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposure. The Committee presents its findings to the full Board, which is charged with approving the Company’s risk appetite. At each Audit Committee meeting, management presents an update of the Company’s risk management activities. The Company has two internal Risk Committees that report to the Audit Committee at least quarterly. The SJI Risk Management Committee (RMC), established by the SJI Audit Committee in 1998, is responsible for overseeing the energy transactions and the related risks for all of the SJI companies. Annually, the Board approves the RMC members. Committee members include management from key Company areas such as finance, risk management, legal and business operations. The RMC establishes a general framework for measuring and monitoring business risks related to both financial and physical energy transactions, approves all methodologies used in risk measurement, ensures that objective and independent controls are in place, and presents reports to the Audit Committee reflecting risk management activity, including an annual evaluation of risk on an enterprise-wide basis. A South Jersey Gas Company RMC is responsible for gas supply risk management. Annually, the Board approves the RMC members. Committee members include management from key Company areas such as finance, risk management, legal and gas supply. This RMC meets at least quarterly. The Audit Committee established policies and procedures for engaging the independent registered public accounting firm to provide audit and permitted non-audit services. The Audit Committee evaluates itself on an annual basis. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our website at www.sjindustries.com, under the heading “Investors.” You may obtain a copy by writing to the Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries Board of Directors, South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. Compensation Committee The Board’s Compensation Committee, which met foursix times during 2012,2014, was comprised of five “independent” directors through April 2012 and four “independent” directors for the remainder of 2012:in 2014: Keith S. Campbell, Chairman; Dr. Shirli M. Billings (January – April); Sheila Harnett-Devlin; Sunita Holzer; Joseph H. Petrowski (January – April); and Frank L. Sims (May – December).Sims. The CompensationCompensation Committee: (1) is responsible for making grants under and otherwise administering the Company’s Stock-Based Compensation Plan; (2) reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors on the operation, performance and administration of the retirement plans, other employee benefit plans and employment policies; and (3) reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors on forms of compensation, including the performance and levels of compensation of the officers of the Company. The Committee’s charter is available on our website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors” or you may obtain a copy by writing to the Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries Board of Directors, South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation No member of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or employee of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. During the last fiscal year, none of the Company’s executive officers served on a compensation committee or as a director for any other publicly traded company. Corporate Responsibility Committee The Board’s Corporate Responsibility Committee, which met three timestwice during 2012,2014, was comprised of four “independent” directors in 2012:2014: Thomas A. Bracken, Chairman, Dr. Shirli M. Billings (January - April 2012);Chairman; Keith S. Campbell; Victor A. Fortkiewicz; and Sunita Holzer (May – December 2012).Holzer. The Committee provides oversight, monitoring and guidance of matters related to corporate and social citizenship, public and legal policy, environmental stewardship and compliance, political activities, sustainability, quality of work life, and economic and social vitality in the communities and markets in which the Company operates. The Committee’s charter is available on our website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors” or you may obtain a copy by writing to the Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries Board of Directors, South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. The Committee also oversees the production of the Company’s annual Corporate Sustainability Report, which conveys how the Company links the business with sustainable practices. The 20122014 report is available on our website at www.sjindustries.com or you may obtain a copy by writing to the Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries Board of Directors, South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. Governance Committee The Board’s Governance Committee, which met fivefour times during 2012,2014, was comprised of four “independent” directors in 2012: Dr. Shirli M. Billings, Chairman (January – April 2012); Sarah M. Barpoulis (May – December 2012); Victor A. Fortkiewicz;2014: Walter M. Higgins III, who was elected Chairman in April 2012; Sunita Holzer (January – April 2012)Chairman; Sarah M. Barpoulis; Victor A. Fortkiewicz; and Joseph H. Petrowski (May – December 2012).Petrowski. Each Committee member satisfies the New York Stock Exchange’s independence requirements. Among its functions, the Governance Committee: (1) maintains a list of prospective candidates for director, including those recommended by shareholders; (2) reviews the qualifications of candidates for director (to review minimum qualifications for director candidates, please see the Company’s Corporate Guidelines available on our website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors.” These guidelines include consideration of education, experience, judgment, diversity and other applicable and relevant skills as determined by an assessment of the Board’s needs when an opening exists); (3) makes recommendations to the Board of Directors to fill vacancies and for nominees for election to be voted on by the shareholders; and (4) is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policy. The Committee’s charter is available on our website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors” or you may obtain a copy by writing to the Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries Board of Directors, South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037. The Governance Committee reviews with the Board on an annual basis the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members in the context of the current Board make-up and the Company’s strategic forecast. This assessment includes issues of industry experience, education, general business and leadership experience, judgment, diversity, age, and other applicable and relevant skills as determined by an assessment of the Board’s needs. The diversity assessment includes a review of Board composition with regard to race, gender, age and geography. The Governance Committee will consider nominees for the Board of Directors recommended by shareholders and submitted in compliance with the Company’s bylaws, in writing, to the Corporate Secretary of the Company. Any shareholder wishing to propose a nominee should submit a recommendation in writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037, indicating the nominee’s qualifications and other relevant biographical information and providing confirmation of the nominee’s consent to serve as a director. Executive Committee The Board’s Executive Committee, which met two times during 2012,did not meet in 2014, was comprised of the Chairman of the SJI Board, Chairmen of the subsidiary Boards, Committee Chairs and the Lead Independent Director, and is chaired by the Chairman of the Board. The Committee’s membership currently consists of six directors:current members are: Edward J. Graham, Chairman; Thomas A. Bracken; Keith S. Campbell; Sheila Hartnett-Devlin; Walter M. Higgins, III; and Joseph H. Petrowski. The Executive Committee may act on behalf of the Board of Directors during intervals between Board meetings in managing the Company’s business and affairs. Pursuant to its charter, the Executive Committee meets on an “as needed” basis. AUDIT COMMITTEECOMMITTEE REPORT The Board’s Audit Committee comprises six directors, each of whom is independent as defined under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and satisfies the additional independence criteria applicable to Audit Committee members. The Board has determined that each member of the Committee is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee’s activities and scope of its responsibilities are set forth in a written charter adopted by the Board, and is posted on the Company’s website at www.sjindustries.com under the heading “Investors”. In accordance with its charter adopted by the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee, among other things, assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of the Company’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. Management is responsible for preparing the Company’s financial statements and for assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for examining those financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2014, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting with management and with Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the mattersall communications required to be discussed by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61 (AICPA Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as amended, and “Communication with Audit Committees,” as amendedadopted by SAS 89 and SAS 90, and Rule 2-07, “Communication with Audit Committees, of Regulation S-X”, and by standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board - United States (PCAOB), relating to the audit’s conduct. in Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee also received written disclosures from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding its independence from the Company that satisfy applicable PCAOB requirements for independent accountant communications with audit committees concerning auditor independence, and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the independence of that firm. Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements and management assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2014, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Audit Committee Sheila Hartnett-Devlin, Chairman Sarah M. Barpoulis Thomas A. Bracken Walter M. Higgins III Joseph H. Petrowski Frank L. Sims Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm As part of its duties, the Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of services other than the audit services by the independent registered public accountants to the Company is compatible with maintaining the accountants’ independence. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP. The Audit Committee discussed these services with the independent registered public accounting firm and Company management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The fees for all services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company during 20122014 and 20112013 are as follows: | FY 2014 | | FY 2013 | | | Audit Fees (a) | | | $ | 2,152,750 | | Audit Fees (a) | | | $ | 1,902,400 | | | Fees per Engagement Letter | | | 1,790,000 | | | | | | Fees per Engagement Letter | | | 1,645,000 | | | | | | | FY 2013 Audit true up billed | | | 85,000 | | | | | | FY 2012 Audit true up billed | | | 207,400 | | | | | | | FY 2013 SJG Form 10-K SEC Comment Letter | | | - | | | | | | FY 2012 Form 10-K SEC Comment Letter | | | 50,000 | | | | | | | Audit work related to 2014 non-routine events | | | 274,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Registration Form S-3 | | | 3,750 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Audit-Related Fees (b) | | | | | | | 110,000 | | Audit-Related Fees (b) | | | | 108,000 | | | Benefit Plan Audits | | | 110,000 | | | | | | Benefit Plan Audits | | | 100,000 | | | | | | | SJESP Separate Report | | | - | | | | | | SJESP Separate Report | | | 4,000 | | | | | | | South Jersey Energy Company | | | - | | | | | | South Jersey Energy Company | | | 4,000 | | | | | | | Tax Fees (c) | | | | 214,557 | | Tax Fees (c) | | | | 80,800 | | | Form 5500 & Form 8955-SSA | | | 10,890 | | | | | | Form 5500 | | | 8,800 | | | | | | | Tax compliance | | | 153,667 | | | | | | Review of Federal Tax Return | | | 22,000 | | | | | | | Fees related to tangible property regulations phase II | | | 50,000 | | | | | | Fees related to tangible property regulations | | | 50,000 | | | | | | | All Other Fees | | | | | | All Other Fees | | | | | | | Total | | | $ | 2,477,307 | | Total | | | $ | 2,091,200 | |
| FY 2012 | | | FY 2011 | | | Audit Fees (a) | | | $ | 1,650,000 | | | Audit Fees (a) | | | $ | 1,368,800 | | Fees per Engagement Letter | | | 1,500,000 | | | | | | | Fees per Engagement Letter | | | 1,268,400 | | | | | | FY 2011 Audit true up billed | | | 150,000 | | | | | | | FY 2010 Audit true up billed | | | 100,400 | | | | | | Audit-Related Fees (b) | | | | | | | 115,500 | | | Audit-Related Fees (b) | | | | 105,500 | | Benefit Plan Audits | | | 53,000 | | | | | | | Benefit Plan Audits | | | 41,000 | | | | | | SJESP Separate Report | | | - | | | | | | | SJESP Separate Report | | | 12,000 | | | | | | South Jersey Energy Company | | | - | | | | | | | South Jersey Energy Company | | | 7,500 | | | | | | Registration Form S-3 | | | 12,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LVE Audit | | | 50,000 | | | | | | | LVE Audit | | | 45,000 | | | | | | | Tax Fees (c) | | | | 44,500 | | | Tax Fees (c) | | | | 27,000 | | Form 5500 & Form 8955-SSA | | | 8,000 | | | | | | | Form 5500 | | | 7,000 | | | | | | Form 3115 | | | 15,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Review of Federal Tax Return | | | 21,000 | | | | | | | Review of Federal Tax Return | | | 20,000 | | | | | | | All Other Fees | | | | | | | All Other Fees | | | | | | | Total | | | $ | 1,810,000 | | | Total | | | $ | 1,501,300 | |
(a) Fees for audit services billed or expected to be billed relating to fiscal 20122014 and 20112013 include audits of the Company’s annual financial statements, evaluation and reporting on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, comfort letters, consents and other services related to Securities and Exchange Commission matters. (b) Fees for audit-related services provided during fiscal 20122014 and 20112013 consisted of employee benefit plan audits, other, compliance audits, and registrar audits. (c) Fees for tax services provided during fiscal 20122014 and 20112013 consisted of tax compliance.compliance and compliance-related research. Tax compliance services are services rendered based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred to document, compute, and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings and Federal, state and local income tax return assistance. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORSDIRECTORS In 2011, SJI’s Director Compensation Program was comprised of the following components: 1) An annual cash retainer for Board and Committee service payable monthly; 2) Meeting fees for Committee meetings in excess of four per year; 3) Annual restricted stock grant with a three-year3-year vesting period and; 4) Additional retainers for the Lead Independent Director and Committee Chairs In 2011, the Board engaged Frederic W. Cook (Cook) as its consultant to review the Company’s Director Compensation Program (Program) to ensure that the Board attracts and retains highly qualified directors. Cook evaluated total compensation and the structure of the Director Compensation programs. Cook made findings regarding compensation levels and the Program structure, including a finding that two elements of SJI director compensation program were not consistent with emerging trends and potentially could be perceived as compromising director independence: Restricted stock unit vesting period is three years. The majority of SJI peer companies grant equity awards that have vesting periods of one year or less. Providing life insurance and accident insurance are no longer a prevalent practice. Cook was retained to perform the subsequent studies, including engagement in 2013 to review Director Compensation and provide any recommendations for 2014. For that study, the reference points were the director compensation for the following peer companies, consistent with the group used to assess the competitiveness of the Company’s peer companies - AGL Resources Inc., Atmos Energy Corp.,Executive Compensation Program: Black Hills Corp., CH Energy Group, Inc., Energen, Corp., Laclede Group Inc., New Jersey Resources Corp., Nicor Inc., Northwest Natural Gas Co., Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Questar Corp., Southwest Gas Corp., UIL Holdings Corp., Vectren Corp. and WGL Holdings Inc. In a study presented in November 2013, Cook made the following findings regarding the 2011 Program: ● | SJI director total compensation approximated the peer group median on a “per director” basis, consistent with the Company’s targeted competitive positioning. |
● | Cash compensation was between the 25th percentile and median. |
● | Equity compensation was between the 25th percentile and median. |
● | The structure of SJI’s director compensation program was generally consistent with peer group practice. |
● | Committee chair and Lead Independent Director retainers approximated the median. |
● | Two elements of SJI director compensation program were not consistent with emerging trends and potentially could be perceived as compromising director independence: |
– | Restricted stock unit vesting period is three years. The majority of SJI peer companies grant equity awards that have vesting periods of one year or less. |
– | Providing life insurance and accident insurance are no longer a prevalent practice. |
Cook substantiated their findings with regard to Director compensation with the following information: See Appendix A.found as follows:
On a “per director” basis, the program approximated the median of peer group practice and was consistent with the Company’s targeted competitive positioning for non-employee director and executive compensation. 18Cash compensation was between the median and the 75th percentile.
Equity compensation was between the 25th percentile and the median. Significant changes to director compensation levels were not warranted; however, the Committee could consider an increase to the RSU grant in anticipation of market movement. The design of the Company’s director compensation program was generally consistent with peer company policy and that no changes to SJI’s Program are proposed. The Program design strongly supports the long-term shareholder alignment objective through use of RSUs as the sole equity grant type and director stock ownership guidelines; however, the ownership guideline of five times the cash retainer of $40,000 was below the 25th percentile of the peer group practice. The use of additional retainers recognizes responsibilities and the time commitment associated with serving as lead independent director or chairing a committee. The value of SJI’s Lead Independent Director and Committee Chair retainers are aligned with peer group median practice. Based on Cook’s findings and recommendations, in 2012,2013 the Company paid non-employee directors as follows: I. Compensation: Non – Employee Directors A. Board Service | 1. | Cash - | Annual Retainer for Board Service: | | $ | 55,000 | * | | | | Annual Retainer for Committee Meetings: | | | 15,000 | | | | | Annual Retainer (payable monthly): | | $ | 70,000 | |
| 1. Cash - | | | Annual Retainer for Board Service | | $ | 40,000 | | | | | | Annual Retainer for Committee Meetings | | | 30,000 | | | | | | Annual Retainer (payable monthly): | | $ | 70,000 | |
2. Restricted Stock – SJI shares with a total value of $65,000$75,000 awarded annually in January. The value of the shares is based on the daily average share price for the period July 1 through December 31 of the prior year. * 3. Lead Independent Director - Annual Retainer (payable monthly): $12,500 $13,500 B. Committee4. Independent Subsidiary Chair Retainer: $8,000
B.Committee Service 1. Annual Chairman Retainers (payable monthly): | Audit | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | Compensation | | $ | 8,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | Governance | | $ | 6,000 | | | $ | 6,000 | | | Corporate Responsibility | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 5,000 | |
2. Meeting Fee: $1,500 for each Committee meeting in excess of four meetings per year. 3. Ad Hoc Committees: In the event a Committee is formed for a special project, the Committee members will be paid $1,500 per meeting and the Chairman will be paid a retainer in an amount approved by the Board of Directors. II. Other Benefits & Items A. $ 50,000 Group Life Insurance** B. $250,000 24 Hr. Accident Protection Insurance**Insurance C. Restricted Stock Deferral Plan D. D&O Insurance - $35$35 Million w/$10 Million Entity Sublimit No Deductible for D&O $200,000 $200,000 Deductible for Corporation
E. Travel Expenses Reimbursed Upon Request III. Share Ownership Requirements MembersNon-employee members of the Board of Directors are required, within six years of becoming a director of the Company or any of its principal subsidiaries, or within six years of a change of the share ownership guidelines, to own shares of Company Common Stock with a market value equal to a minimum of five times the current value of a Director’s annual retainer for Board Service. Shares owned outright will be combined with restricted shares awarded as part of the annual stock retainer for the purpose of meeting these requirements.
| * | Commencing with grant awarded in 2012,January 1, 2014, the vesting period will be one year. For grants awarded priorcash allocation was revised to 2012, the vesting period is three years.$55,000 for Board service and $15,000 for Committee service from $40,000 and 30,000, respectively. |
| ** | Life insurance benefits were eliminated for Directors elected after April 2011. The life insurance coverage remained in place for Directors elected prior to or during April 2011. |
In March of 2012, the Governance Committee nominated an independentIndependent Director to serve as Chairman of the South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC (SJES) Executive Committee. Based on the recommendation of Cook, the Board determined that an additional retainer would be paid for independent directors who serve as Chairman of the Board of SJI and its subsidiaries. Commencing May 2012, an $8,000 annual retainer was paid to the Chairman of the SJES Executive Committee. Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 20122014
Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) (1) (2) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | | Change in Pension Value And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) (3) | | | Total ($) | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) (1) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) (2) | Total ($) | Sarah M. Barpoulis (5) | | | 51,167 | | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 51,167 | | | Shirli M. Billings (4) | | | 25,333 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 122 | | | | 95,455 | | | | Sarah M. Barpoulis | | | 76,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 146,000 | Thomas A. Bracken | | | 81,000 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 366 | | | | 151,366 | | | 81,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | 390 | | 151,390 | Keith S. Campbell | | | 78,000 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 366 | | | | 148,366 | | | 83,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | 390 | | 153,390 | Victor A. Fortkiewicz | | | 70,000 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 366 | | | | 140,366 | | | 70,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | 390 | | 140,390 | Sheila Hartnett-Devlin | | | 86,000 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 366 | | | | 156,366 | | | 89,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | 390 | | 159,390 | Sunita Holzer | | | 70,000 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 140,000 | | | 73,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 143,000 | Walter M. Higgins III | | | 95,106 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 366 | | | | 165,472 | | | 95,500 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | 390 | | 165,890 | Frank L. Sims (5) | | | 51,167 | | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 51,167 | | | | Frank L. Sims | | | 79,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 149,000 | Joseph H. Petrowski | | | 79,833 | | | | 70,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 366 | | | | 150,199 | | | 84,000 | 70,000 | | | - | | - | | - | | 390 | | 154,390 |
Footnotes (1) RepresentsPer the 2014 Director Compensation Program, the independent directors were granted 1,290 restricted stock units valuing $75,000 using the daily closing prices for the last two quarters of 2013. The above chart reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted common stock awards granted in the respective fiscal year, calculated in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. Restricted stock grants were made to each director in January 2012 of 1,238 shares usingCompensation, which requires that the average ofgrant be measured at the daily closing prices for the last two quarters of 2011.grant date fair value. (2) In January 2013, each Director listed above, with the exception of Shirli M. Billings, who is no longer a Director, received shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a value of $70,000. As of January 2013, each current Director with the exception of Directors Barpoulis, Fortkiewicz, Holzer and Sims, has three outstanding restricted stock grants as follows: | Grant Date | | Stock Grant Cash Allocation | | | # of Shares | | | Value as of January 4, 2013 | | | 2011 | | $ | 60,000 | | | | 1,222 | | | $ | 63,226 | | | 2012 | | $ | 65,000 | | | | 1,238 | | | $ | 64,054 | | | 2013 | | $ | 70,000 | | | | 1,365 | | | $ | 70,625 | |
(3) Represents group life insurance payments and accidental death and dismemberment.
(4) Shirli M. Billings directorship ended April 2012.
(5) Directors Sims and Barpoulis joined the Board in April 2012 and received their first stock grant award in January 2013.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPSRELATIONSHIPS Mr. Campbell is Chairman of Mannington Mills, Inc., which purchases natural gas from Company subsidiaries. Commencing January 2004, as a result of winning a competitive bid, another Company subsidiary owns and operates a cogeneration facility that provides electricity to Mannington Mills, Inc. Review and Approval Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions Pursuant to a policy adopted by the Company’s Governance Committee, the Company’s executive officers and directors, and principal stockholders, including their immediate family members and affiliates, are not permitted to enter into a related party transaction with the Company without the Governance Committee’s or other independent Board committee’s prior consent, in cases in which it is inappropriate for the Governance Committee to review the transaction due to a conflict of interest. In approving or rejecting the proposed transaction, the Governance Committee shall consider the facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the Committee. The Governance Committee shall approve only those transactions that, in light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, the Company’s best interests, as the Governance Committee determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion. Compensation Committee Report We have reviewed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussion, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s proxy statement, Form 10-K and Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. Compensation Committee Keith S. Campbell, Chairman Sheila Hartnett-Devlin Sunita Holzer Joseph H. Petrowski
Frank L. Sims The following is a discussion and analysis of our executive compensation programs as they apply to our Chairman/President/Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the next three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers in fiscal year 20112014 (our “Named Executives”). Our Named Executives for 20122014 were Edward J. Graham, David A. Kindlick,Stephen H. Clark, Michael J. Renna, Jeffrey E. DuBois and Gina Merritt-Epps. Executive Summary During fiscalFiscal year 2012, we continued2014 was a year of significant investment in our strong growth and financial stability.businesses in support of future earnings growth. Specifically, we achieved strong financial growth in the following key performance measures:
● | We grew Economic Earnings* per share by 5% over prior year results, to $3.03 per share; |
21
We produced record Economic Earnings* in 2014, up 7.1 percent over 2013 performance; and Economic Earnings per share exceeded prior year results at 3.13 per share. This amount represents a 3.3 percent increase in Economic Earnings per share, despite an increase in shares outstanding of 4 percent. ● | We grew Economic Earnings by 7% over 2011 performance; and |
● | We increased our annual dividend to $1.77 per share, a 10% increase over the 2011 annual dividend. |
In addition, our utility and non-utility energy project businesses drove performance in the following areas: ● | Utility operations grew earnings by 10% as we continued to invest heavily in the improvement of natural gas transmission and distribution systems. Utility performance also benefited from the addition of over 7,400 new customers, over 70 percent of which were converted from other fuels; |
We made $343 million in capital investment in our businesses and raised $80.7 million of equity through our dividend reinvestment plan to support that investment; and We increased our annual dividend to $2.01 per share, a 6.3 percent increase over the year end 2013 annual dividend. Highlights at our operating businesses included: ● | Marina Energy Economic Earnings grew 27% as we continued to develop solar energy projects and added two major district heating and cooling facilities to its portfolio of projects; and |
Utility operations grew earnings by 6.8 percent as we continued to invest heavily in the improvement of natural gas transmission and distribution systems and increased our customer base by 4,598 net customers during 2014; ● | We made significant progress towards our goal of transitioning our wholesale energy marketing business from marketing long haul transportation and storage assets to providing producer and user services that focus on the Marcellus shale. |
Our retail and wholesale commodity businesses made substantial contributions, providing $13 million to Economic Earnings in 2014, as compared to a loss of $5.8 million in 2013. The performance improvement was realized largely through the addition of significant pipeline capacity over the last two years and our ability to optimize the value of the capacity we control when favorable market conditions occurred. Our energy production businesses contributed $24.6 million in 2014 as compared to $40.6 million in 2013. This variance was primarily due to a reduction in investment tax credits associated with renewable energy projects, and a reserve for uncollectable accounts and lower operating income recognized at one of Marina’s joint venture energy projects whose primary customer is currently working through bankruptcy proceedings. *Economic Earnings is a financial measure that is not calculated in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For a full discussion of Economic Earnings and a reconciliation to GAAP income, please see our most recent Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013.27, 2015. The Compensation Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors is committed to providing a strong pay for performance executive compensation program that includes an appropriate mix of short-term and long-term incentives to drive shareholder value. Based upon this philosophy and our 20122014 performance, the Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to the 20122014 compensation for Named Executives: ● | Awarded salary increases to all of our Named Executives to align them within market median of comparable executives in our peer group; |
Continued to grant 100 percent of equity as performance awards; Awarded cash payments to our Named Executives based on SJI and individual performance in 2014, awarding our CEO a cash award of $689,456 and cash awards to our other Named Executives ranging from $161,477 to $322,210 as discussed in more detail below under the section entitled “2014 Annual Cash Awards”; ● | Awarded cash payments to our Named Executives based on SJI and individual performance in 2012, awarding our CEO a cash award of $510,469 and cash awards to our other Named Executives ranging from $102,094 to $166,800 as discussed in more detail below under the section entitled “2012 Annual Cash Awards;” |
Modified our peer group to eliminate companies that were outliers from a size perspective and to include a company with comparable revenue; and ● | Adopted a new Annual Incentive Compensation Plan that is structured to permit the Committee to grant awards that meet the “qualified performance-based compensation” exemption under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
Awarded salary increases to all of our Named Executives to better align them with comparable executives in our peer group. ● | Adjusted certain performance measures utilized our annual and long-term awards, including earnings per share and relative shareholder return, to align SJI with peer group industry standards and our pay for performance philosophy. |
● | Modified our peer group so that the same peer group is used to benchmark both short-term and long-term compensation to help ensure alignment between pay and performance. |
General Description of Executive Compensation Program and Key Objectives As a provider of energy-related products and services, SJI has designed its executive compensation program to advance the Company’s strategic plan and corporate mission, which are rooted in enhancing shareholder value while attracting and retaining qualified executive management to carry out the organization’s work and goals. To achieve these objectives, the Company’s executive compensation program incorporates a mix of short-term and long-term performance-based incentives. SJI’s performance over the last three years provides evidence that the executive compensation program was effective in furthering the Company’s business objectives. SJI has outperformed the S&P 500 index in foursix of the last sixten years and compares favorably to the returns of the S&P Utility index over the same period. SJI has outperformed the median of the Company’s peer group used to benchmark long-term incentive compensation in terms of total shareholder return in seven of the last 10 years. By focusing executive compensation on achievement of annual corporate goals, annual and long-term earnings per share targets andten three-year compound annual total shareholder returns,cycles. SJI’s executive compensation program is an integral part of SJI’s corporate strategy for driving shareholder value. Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program SJI’s executive compensation program is administered by the Committee. TheseThe Committee members meet the New York Stock Exchange’s independence standards. In determining the independence of members of the compensation committee, the Board considers all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the Company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including: (i) the source of the director’s compensation, including any consulting, advisory or other compensation fees; and (ii) any affiliate relationships between the director and the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In accordance with its charter, the Committee sets the principles and strategies that guide the design of our employee compensation and benefit programs for our Named Executives. The Committee annually evaluates the CEO’s performance. The Committee also reviews recommendations from the CEO regarding the CEO’s evaluation of the other Named Executives. Taking these performance evaluations into consideration, along with recommendations from our compensation consultant (discussed below), the Committee then establishes and approves compensation levels for our Named Executives, including annual base salaries, performance-based annual cash awards and long-term stock incentive awards. All performance goals for our Named Executives’ annual cash compensation are established at the beginning of each year for use in the performance evaluation process. The Committee meets regularly in executive sessions without members of management present to evaluate the executive compensation program and reports regularly to the Board of Directors on its actions and recommendations. To assist the Committee in its evaluation of the executive compensation program for 2014, the Committee retainsretained an independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook”). Executive Compensation Principles The executive compensation program for our Named Executives is based on the following principles and aimed at achieving the objectives of the Company’s strategic plan while increasing shareholder value: ● | Executive compensation should be directly and measurably linked to business and individual performance with a significant portion of the compensation designed to create incentives for superior performance and meaningful consequences for below-target performance; |
● | Total compensation should be competitive with peer companies to attract, retain and motivate high performing business leaders; |
● | Executive compensation should align the interests of our Named Executives with shareholders so that compensation levels are commensurate with relative shareholder returns and financial performance through the use of performance-based restricted stock; |
● | Incentive plans should balance short-term and long-term financial and strategic objectives whereby Named Executives are rewarded for the businesses for which they are responsible and for overall Company performance; and |
��� | The process for designing, determining and monitoring executive compensation should be independent of management and use the assistance of independent compensation consultants reporting directly to the Committee. |
Executive compensation should be directly and measurably linked to business and individual performance with a substantial portion of the compensation designed to create incentives for superior performance and meaningful consequences for below-target performance; 23Total compensation should be competitive with peer companies to attract, retain and motivate high performing business leaders;
Executive compensation should align the interests of our Named Executives with shareholders so that compensation levels are commensurate with relative shareholder returns and financial performance through the use of performance-based restricted stock; Incentive plans should balance short-term and long-term financial and strategic objectives whereby Named Executives are rewarded for the businesses for which they are responsible and for overall Company performance; and The process for designing, determining and monitoring executive compensation should be independent of management and use the assistance of independent compensation consultants reporting directly to the Committee. Shareholder Say-on-Pay Vote At the Company’s annual meetingAnnual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders held in April 2012,2014, we presented our shareholders with a vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executives as disclosed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of our proxy statement relating to that meeting (referred to as a “say-on-pay” proposal). 96.5%94.82 percent of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal voted in favor of the proposal. In evaluating our executive compensation program in 2012, theThe Compensation Committee considered the significantvote and given the overwhelming level of support, our shareholders expressed for our philosophy of linkingmade minimal changes to the executive compensation to performance. As a result of this evaluation the Committee did not significantly change the compensation approach in 2012, but did adopt a new Annual Incentive Compensation Plan that is structured to permit the Committee to grant awards that meet the “qualified performance-based compensation” exemption under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and modified our peer group and adjusted certain performance measures for both annual and long-term performance-based awards to better align our pay with our performance.program. Compensation Practices The Company’s current executive compensation structure has been in place since 1998 and applies to all Company officers, including our Named Executives. At that time, a comprehensive study of executive compensation alternatives was undertaken, a primary objective being the creation of a system that aligns the interestinterests of Company shareholders with the financial incentives for executives on a short-term and long-term basis. Subsequently, on a three-year3-year cycle, a compensation structure and market competitiveness study has beenwas completed to ensure that our executive compensation structure remained consistent with contemporary compensation methods and tools. Upon the recommendation of Cook in September 2011, the Committee determined that an annual review of its executive compensation program would ensure SJI remained competitive among its peer group. As a result, for 2012 and future years, the Committee will reviewreviews direct compensation (base pay, annual cash and long-term incentives) annually. The Committee will continue to review indirect compensation (pension, SERP and change ofin control agreements) on a three-year3-year cycle, or more frequently, if warranted, based on market conditions and the recommendation of Cook.our executive compensation consultant. Consistent with this philosophy, Cook conducted an overall compensation study that was presented to the Committee in September of 2011.2013. This report examined all components of our executive compensation program and provided an analysis of how our Named Executives’ base salaries, annual cash and long-term incentive compensation compare with peer companies in the energy industry and the general business community. The Committee targets to maintain compensation levels at the 50th percentile of the competitive market levels of peer companies. The purpose of the Committee targeting the 50th percentile of the competitive market is to provide a level of compensation that is adequate for the Company to be able to attract and retain qualified executives while at the same time protecting shareholder interests. This “middle of the road” compensation philosophy allows that one half of all companies in the competitive market target higher levels of pay than SJI. It also acts to protect shareholders from the risk of overpayments that might result from a higher target pay position (e.g. 75th percentile). Although pay is targeted at the 50th percentile, actual levels of pay depend on a variety of factors such as tenure and individual and Company performance. The Committee uses a working range of 20%20 percent above or below this benchmark to identify any “red flags” that represent outliers in need of special attention and refinement. The Committee refers to this targeted percentage as the targeted competitive position. The Cook report analyzed both Total Cash Compensation (TCC = base salary + annual incentive compensation) and Total Direct Compensation (TDC = TCC + the value of long-term incentives/equity). On average, other than the CEO, the Cook report found that our Named Executives’ TCC and TDC levels were below the targeted competitive position and recommended that the Committee consider increases in TCC and TDC levels for consistency with the targeted competitive position of our peer companies. Along with reviewing our executive compensation program, the Committee reviews and determines the appropriate peer group companies for benchmarking purposes. Consistent with our goal of providing competitive compensation, we compare our executive compensation programs to those programs in place at identified peer companies. For 2012,2014, the Committee, in consultation with Cook, selected a peer group for TCC that was comprised of 1311 similarly sized gas and multi-utility companies based on an analysis of the following measures: revenue; operating income; net income; total assets; market capitalization; and total employees. In terms of size, the Company’s market capitalization of $1.627 million is between the 25th percentile and the median of the market capitalization of the peer group. Specifically, theThe market capitalization of the peer group companies ranges from approximately $800 million$1.2 billion to $4$4.3 billion, with a median of $1.972 million. Cook considers market capitalization the best peer group measure based on the Company’s complexity due to its large non-regulated business. For all other peer group measures the Company is at or below the 25th percentile.$2.2 billion. This peer group was revised from 20112013 to eliminate two utility companies based on size and differences in current business model.to include one company with comparable revenue. The peer group consists of the following companies: AGL Resources | Atmos Energy Corporation | Black Hills Corporation | CH Energy Group, Inc. | Energen Corporation | Laclede Group, Inc. | Nicor, Inc.* | New Jersey Resources Corp. | Northwest Natural Gas Co. | | Piedmont Natural Gas Co. | | Questar Corporation | Southwest Gas Corporation | UIL Holdings | | Vectren Corp. | | WGL Holdings, Inc. | | | | | | *Nicor, Inc. was aquired by AGL Resources. | | |
For purposes of benchmarking the long-term incentive program, the Committee had historically identified an additional peer group that was comprised of approximately 40 energy companies against whose performance total shareholder return of the Company was gauged. However, for 2012, at the recommendation of Cook, the Committee determined that it was appropriate to the use the same peer group for both short-term and long-term compensation to help ensure alignment between pay and performance. In addition to The Committee relied on the peer group discussed above, the Committee usesfor all formal benchmarking and generally considered energy industry specific compensation surveys in evaluating compensation for our Named Executives. They include the following four surveys:
● | American Gas Association (AGA) survey data for selected positions. |
● | A Mercer industry survey and two other general industry surveys from Cook (all three of which were proprietary and not publicly available). |
Cook adjusted all survey data for size, based on the Company’s revenue scope for SJI positions and business unit scope for South Jersey Gas and South Jersey Energy Solutions positions.data.
The Committee believes that the peer group data and industry compensation studies give the Committee an independent and accurate view of the market “value” of each position on a comparative basis. Based on this information from Cook and the performance evaluations discussed above, the Committee determines the TCC and TDC for each Named Executive. In general, long-term incentives are valued based on amounts reported either in the peer group data or in survey data submissions. Full value equity awards (restricted shares, restricted share units and outright stock awards) are valued at fair value. Performance-based plans are valued assuming 100%100 percent performance is achieved. On a job-by-job basis, this market benchmark information is compared to actual SJI levels of pay and target pay opportunity. The Committee has reviewed its engagement with Cook and believes there is no conflict of interest between Cook and the Committee. In reaching this conclusion, the Committee considered the factors regarding compensation advisor independence set forth in the SEC rule effective July 27, 2012 and the NYSE proposed listing standards released on September 25, 2012 that were adopted by the SEC on January 11, 2013. Compensation Components The Company’s executive compensation structure consists of three parts, two of which are directly linked to achieving predefined short-term and long-term performance goals. These three components were fully implemented with respect to compensation and performance for fiscal year 2000 and each year thereafter including fiscal year 2012.2014. Descriptions of the three components for our Named Executives are set forth below: Base Salary For 2014, the CEO’s base salary was at 31 percent of his targeted TDC and our other Named Executive Officers’ average base salary was 43 percent of their targeted TDC. Base salarysalaries for our Named Executives isExecutive Officers are targeted at the 50th percentile or median of the relevant peer group and/or competitive market. For 2012,group. Historically, Named Executive Officer salaries have not met this targeted level and trend well below it. According to the CEO’s2013 Cook report, base salary is targeted at 35%salaries approximated the 25th percentile of the peer group. Two Named Executive Officers were new to their roles in 2014, specifically Messrs. Clark and Renna. Each received approximately 20 percent as a step to move them closer the targeted TDC and ourpeer position. The three other Named Executives’ base salary is targeted atExecutive Officers received an average salary increase of 44%6 percent. The Committee approved the following base salary increasessalaries for our Named Executives. These increases were provided to better align our Named Executives and their TDC with the targeted competitive position of our peer companies.Executive Officers. | Name | | Base Salary for 2013 | | | Base Salary for 2014 | | | Edward J. Graham | | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | 721,000 | | | Stephen H. Clark | | | 231,755 | | | | 275,000 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 330,000 | | | | 400,000 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 320,000 | | | | 350,000 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 302,775 | | | | 320,000 | |
| Name | | Base Salary for 2011 | | | Base Salary for 2012 | | | Edward J. Graham | | $ | 660,000 | | | $ | 670,000 | | | David A. Kindlick | | | 283,500 | | | | 300,000 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 282,975 | | | | 300,000 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 257,250 | | | | 309,500 | * | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 220,000 | | | | 275,250 | ** |
* Mr. DuBois received a base salary increase to $280,000 as of January 1, 2012, based on the Cook analysis discussed above to better align him with the TDC of targeted competitive positions of our peer companies. Mr. DuBois received a subsequent base salary increase to $309,500, effective as of April 22, 2012, in connection with his promotion to President of South Jersey Gas Company.
**Ms. Merritt-Epps received a base salary increase to $251,000 as of January 1, 2012, based on the Cook analysis discussed above to better align her with the TDC of targeted competitive positions of our peer companies. Ms. Merritt-Epps received a subsequent base salary increase to $275,250, effective as of April 22, 2012, in connection with her promotion to General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
Annual Cash Awards Each Named Executive hashad a pre-established annual cash target award opportunity for 2012.2014. Named Executives can achieve cash awards up to 150%150 percent of their annual cash target award opportunity based on the achievement of the performance metrics discussed below. The 20122014 annual cash target award opportunitiesopportunity for each Named Executive is set forth below: | Name | | Cash Target Award Opportunity | | | Total Cash Award Achieved for 2014 Performance | | | Edward J. Graham | | $ | 540,750 | | | $ | 689,456 | | | Stephen H. Clark | | | 137,500 | | | | 161,477 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 280,000 | | | | 322,210 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 210,000 | | | | 249,113 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 144,000 | | | | 166,230 | |
| Name | | Cash Target Award Opportunity | | | Total Cash Award Achieved for 2012 Performance | | | Edward J. Graham | | $ | 495,000 | | | $ | 510,469 | | | David A. Kindlick | | | 141,750 | | | | 141,750 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 160,000 | | | | 166,800 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 140,000 | | | | 165,550 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 99,000 | | | | 102,094 | |
The performance metrics used for our Named Executives are economic earnings, per share, financial performance of subsidiaries and individual balanced scorecard objectives and are weighted as set forth in the chart below. Annual cash awards for 2012 were not structured to meet the qualified performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Shareholder approval was received in 2012 for our Annual Incentive Plan so that commencing in 2013, annual cash awards granted by the Committee under the Annual Incentive Plan could be structured to qualify for the qualified performance-based compensation exemption from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. For 2014, the annual cash award for the CEO was structured to meet the qualified performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. 20122014 Annual Cash Awards
Metrics CEO CFO
| 75% SJI Economic Earnings Per Share | -
| 25% Peer group averages for return on equity by quartile | | CFO | 50% SJI Economic Earnings | 25% Financial Performance of relevant subsidiary company | 25% Specific, measurable, and predefined performance objectives | Subsidiary
LeadOther Named Executives
| 25% SJI Economic Earnings Per Share | 50% Financial Performance of relevant subsidiary company
company(ies) | 25% Specific, measurable, and predefined performance objectives | Other Named
Executives
| 50% SJI Economic Earnings Per Share | -
| 50% Specific, measurable, and predefined performance objectives |
For the SJI economic earnings per share metric, the Committee develops a schedule each year to determine the actual amount of the annual cash awardawards for this metric based on performance. The schedule includes a minimum, target and maximum performance level based on the Company’s earnings per share.economic earnings. The amount of the annual cash award attributed to this metric is capped at the maximum level so that the range for any payout to a Named Executive is plus or minus 50%50 percent of the targeted annual cash amount. The Company must achieve minimum economic earnings per share for any payout of any annual cash award to anythe Named Executive,Executives, including payouts attributed to financial performance of subsidiaries and individual balanced scorecard objectives. For 2012,2014, the minimum economic earnings per share level iswas the amount of the Company’s actual economic earnings per share result of $97,094,279 for 2011.2013. As a result, for the Company’s Named Executives to achieve any annual cash award payout for 2012,2014, the Company had to outperform the 2011 earnings.meet this minimum economic earnings level. The target levelActual SJI economic earnings per share target for 20122014 was $3.03 per share. If earnings per share of $3.03 were achieved, annual cash of 100% of target would have been earned. The maximum level earnings per share target for 2012 was $3.17 per share. At an earnings per share amount of $3.17 per share, 150% of target would have been earned. Actual earnings per share for 2012 was $3.03 per share$103,396,034 which resulted in a cash payout based on 100%120 percent of target. As a result, Messrs. Graham, Kindlick,Clark, Renna, DuBois, Renna and Ms. Merritt-Epps, received the following cash awards attributable to the SJI economic earnings per share target: $371,250, $106,312, $35,000, $40,000$486,675, 82,500, 84,000, 63,000, and $49,500.43,200 respectively.
For Mr. Graham, 25 percent of his annual cash award compensation is tied to return on equity (ROE) based on SJI economic earnings relative to our peer group. The specific payout is based on the following performance which is interpolated between performance levels: | Performance | Payout | | Less than the 35th percentile | 0% | | 35th percentile to 50th percentile | 50% to 100% | | 50th percentile to 80th percentile | 100% to 150% | | Greater than the 80th percentile | 150% |
Based on SJI’s percentile rank of 80.4 percent relative to our peer group, Mr. Graham achieved a cash payout equal to 150 percent or $202,781. For Messrs. Clark, Renna, DuBois and Renna,Ms. Merritt-Epps, performance is also measured using metrics related to the financial performance of the relevant subsidiary companies for which they are responsible.as follows: South Jersey Gas Company (25%) for Mr. Clark; South Jersey Gas Company (20%) and South Jersey Energy Solutions (30%) for Mr. Renna; South Jersey Gas Company (50%) for Mr. DuBois and South Jersey Gas Company (25%) and South Jersey Energy Solutions (25%) for Mr. Renna. This metric carries a 50% weighting of the overall target cash award for each Named Executive.Ms. Merritt-Epps. For 2012,2014, financial performance of the relevant subsidiary companies for which Messrs. DuBois and Renna are responsible was measured based on attainment of certain economic earnings/net income targets. For Mr. DuBois, the South Jersey Gas net income target was $56,902,300. For Mr. Renna, the net income target for South Jersey Energy Solutions, was $36,300,900. The maximum amount of annual cash attributable to the net income/subsidiary financial performance objective was capped at 150%150 percent of target. Based on performance, Mr. DuBois achieved 134% of his cash attributable to the financial performance of Financial results for South Jersey Gas resulting in payment to Mr. DuBoisCompany were 121 percent of $93,800. For Mr. Renna 96% of the target financial performance fortarget. South Jersey Energy Solutions was achieved, resulting inresults were 105 percent of target. As a payment toresult Mr. Clark received a payout of $41,594; Mr. Renna received a payout of $76,800.$155,960; Mr. DuBois received a payout of $127,050, and Ms. Merritt-Epps received a payout of $81,360.
In addition to the Companyfinancial performance components used to determine annual cash awards described above, awards to Named Executives are based on individual balanced scorecard performance, which is weighted 25%25 percent for Messrs. Graham, Kindlick,Clark, Renna, DuBois, and Renna. For Ms. Merritt-Epps, the individual balanced scorecard objectives are weighted 50%.Merritt-Epps. An individual balanced scorecard (“BSC”) is a strategic performance management tool that has four quadrants that may be used to measure financial and non-financial goals. The four perspectives that the BSC measures against may include financial, customer, process and learning and growth. 20122014 Balanced Scorecard Summary Objectives
| | Objectives | Measurement Goals | Performance Level Achieved | Edward J. Graham,
CEO
Stephen H. Clark, CFO | ExecutionCapital Structure
| Oversee development and implementation of measures for financial performancestrategy to enhance capital structure and sustainment | Extend capital investment recovery tracker (CIRT) beyond 2012; continue to expand key regulatory projects to grow future earnings, while measuring appropriate risk
liquidity | Achieved strong performance through pending extension of CIRTbased upon enhanced capital structure and strong commitments for key regulatory projectsliquidity | | Rates and Regulatory Affairs | Achieve key regulatory initiatives | Strategic Planning/VisionAchieved above target performance on regulatory initiatives completed
| | Organizational Efficiency | Enhance performance of key functional areas | Expanded strategic plans at SJIAchieved target performance via functional area restructuring, revised reporting and subsidiary company levels; elevate strategic plan discussions to Boardthe implementation of Director levelprocess refinements
| | Succession Planning | Development of key departmental personnel | Achieved strongtarget performance through refinement of cash flow projections and improvement of strategic planningdevelopment process | Organizational Development/Michael J. Renna, President & COO, SJI;
succession planning
President, SJES | FormulateMaintain a focus on customer growth, satisfaction and implement development opportunitiesproviding long term customer value
| Expand CHP portfolio; Achieve targeted ITC levels; Strengthen CHP/renewable department queue; Retain key accounts; Improve PA retail margins; Increase wholesale volumes and construct more advanced development plans; extend succession planning for key officersmargins; and Expand niche wholesale markets | Achieved targetstrong performance based on key internal organization changes but additional succession planning necessaryincluding improving Open Flow/Hershey profitability; grew wholesale volumes by adding four new producer contracts; and expanded niche wholesale markets | Enhanced CustomerImprove operating efficiency and Shareholder Relations
productivity | Expand communications efforts at SJI, including shareholder outreach
Improve SJRG operating margins; Achieve renewable operating targets; Achieve CHP operating targets; Improve SJESP operating margins; Improve retail sales effectiveness; and Implement system conversions | Achieved targetstrong performance based on strong investor relations effortby improving SJRG and customer satisfaction |
David A. Kindlick,
CFO
| Regulatory
| Develop SJG regulatory plan and implement key initiatives
| Achieved target performance based on CIRT program updatesSJESP operating margins; achieved CHP operating targets. Continued ongoing improvement in retail sales effectiveness
| Risk Management
Build a culture of progress and innovation. Expand and develop managerial and leadership competencies | Evaluate proposed corporate projects on a risk adjusted basis
| Achieved target performance though the development of a modelingExpand POWER program; Improve organizational effectiveness; and evaluation process for new business proposals
| Finance
| IdentifyImprove Board reporting and implement strategy to enhance capital strategy
communication | Achieved target performance based on improved liquidity measurescommunications and cash flow managementexpansion of employee development and leadership programs |
Succession planningJeffrey E. DuBois,
Senior VP, SJI; President, SJG | Continue developmentCustomer Service
| Successful implementation of corporate finance department succession planning | Achieved target performance through internal succession planning within department
| Michael J. Renna,
President,
Solutions
| the Customer growth | Stabilize Marcellus presence; Close EnergenicInformation System (CIS) and Marina projects; Develop solar queue; Expand commodity sales; Retain key accounts; Grow niche wholesale market; Improve service margins
| Achieved maximum performance based on additional incomethe Enterprise Work and improved margins, retention of 100% of all key accounts, additional revenue from key solar projects and stabilization of Marcellus presence
| Operating Efficiency/Productivity
| Acquire trading assets; achieve operating targets for Marina; Improve organizational efficiency; Improve service productivity; Reposition brand; Manage system conversion
| Achieved strong performance through reduction of operating expenses, establishing trading platform conversion and improved long-term contracts
| Expand and develop leadership competencies
| Expand new graduate development program; Improve organizational readiness; improve Board of Director reporting and communication
Asset Management System (EWAMS) | Achieved target performance based on improved Boardsuccessful rollout of Director communications and implementation of succession plansystem in October, 2014 | Jeffrey E. DuBois,
COO, SJG
AIRP/SHARP | Customer service
| Launch process to implement new CIS (customer information services)
Create and support the organization needed for successful roll out of programs | Achieved targetstrong performance based on implementing CIS processsuccessful rollout of programs | Accelerate infrastructure replacement program
Rate Case | Assess viabilitySuccessful completion of continuing and implement
rate case | Achieved targetstrong performance though further advancementbased on successful completion of infrastructure programrate case | Develop work management system (EWAMS)
Succession Planning | Meet milestones to achieve implementation date
| Achieved target performance through successful rollout of EWAMS
| Succession planning
| Identify potential successors and develop plan for their development advancement | Achieved target performance based on internal succession planning | Customer growth
| Create organizational structure that allows the Company to meet its customer growth goals
| Achieved strong performance through high conversion opportunities within region
|
Gina Merritt-Epps, GC and Corporate Sec. | Effectively manage legal financial matters | Efficiently manage legal expenses; manage lawsuit exposure; monitor corporate communications/relations | Achieved target performance based on improved development of legalstrong performance; Legal expense processes and the oversight of HR and corporate matters sufficiently managed lawsuitscontinue to improve | Improve corporate and customer communications | Provide effective legal responses; advise Board of Directors and senior management on legal and regulatory matters; ensure community relations department meets customer needs | Achieved strong performance based on effectively managing legal needs while updating management andof the Board of Directors on pertinent legal matters | Improve corporate legal processes | Improve records and administration process; plan and execute corporate meetings; manage SEC disclosure disclosures | Achieved strong performance by implementing electronic records processwith Board support and effectively meeting deadlines for meetingskey filings; Improved the contract administration system and SEC disclosureother processes | Continue to develop and grow legal and business knowledge | Attend legal seminars and conferences; advise corporate communications of key legal matters | Achieved target performance through stronggrowth of knowledge for legal growth and development but continued business growth necessarygovernance matters |
BSC objectives are predefined at or close to the beginning of the calendar year in which they are to be performed. The objectives are tied to business plans for the applicable year for each of our Named Executives. The achievement of these objectives is measured on a scale of 0 to 5 with 3 being target performance and resulting in payment at 100%100 percent of the 25%25 percent weighting attributable to the BSC component of the annual cash awards. Annual cash awards for this metric are also capped at 150%150 percent of target. The level of performance achieved for each BSC objective is dependent upon the terms of the objective itself, relative to each Named Executive’s performance. Based on the performance level achieved as set forth in the above table, Messrs. Graham, Kindlick,Clark, Renna, DuBois Renna and Ms. Merritt-Epps, received the following BSC ratings for 20122014 individual performance: 3.5, 3.0, 3.2, 4.03.35, 3.70, 3.50, and 3.25.3.63. As a result, each Named Executive achieved annual cash payments attributable to their BSC objectives as follows: Annual Cash Award Attributable to BSC For 20122014 | | | Target (100%) | | | Max (150%) | | | Actual | | | Stephen H. Clark | | | 34,375 | | | | 51,563 | | | | 37,383 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 70,000 | | | | 105,000 | | | | 82,250 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 52,500 | | | | 78,750 | | | | 59,063 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 36,000 | | | | 54,000 | | | | 41,670 | |
| | | Target (100%) | | | Max (150%) | | | Actual | | | Edward J. Graham | | $ | 123,750 | | | $ | 185,625 | | | $ | 139,219 | | | David A. Kindlick | | | 35,438 | | | | 53,156 | | | | 35,438 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 40,000 | | | | 60,000 | | | | 49,000 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 35,000 | | | | 52,500 | | | | 36,370 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 49,500 | | | | 74,250 | | | | 52,594 | |
Long-Term Incentive The long-term incentive component of the executive compensation program for Named Executives consists entirely of performance-based restricted stock grants, which are earned 50%50 percent based upon the Company’s relative total shareholder return over a three-year3-year cycle and 50%50 percent based on EPS growth over a three-year3-year cycle, both measured against the performance of our peer group. Prior to 2012, the long-term incentive component was based 100%100 percent upon the Company’s relative total shareholder return, but at the recommendation of Cook, the Committee revised the long-term incentive component starting in 2012 to include EPS growth as a financial measure to link awards to longer-term operating performance and financialsfinancial goals that are directly controllable by individuals. The Committee has adopted a policy to use performance-based restricted stock as its long-term incentive component to focus on SJI’s pay for performance philosophy. All Named Executives have pre-established performance-based, long-term incentive targets. The Committee has developed a schedule to determine the actual amount of the long-term incentive awards.awards, evaluated for each measure separately. The schedule, which is summarized in the chart below, includes a minimum, target and a maximum performance level. The amount of any long-term incentive award is capped at this maximum level. The range of payout is plus or minus 50%50 percent of the targeted long-term incentive amount. The minimum level requires that the Company’s common stock over a three-year3-year period achieve a total shareholder return and/or EPS growth that matches the 35th percentile of our peer group for long-term incentive awards. The target level is set at the 50th percentile while the maximum award level is set at the 80th percentile. In sixfour of the last eight10 years, the Company has significantly outperformed the median of the peer group.group as it relates to total shareholder return. For the three-year3-year cycle endingended December 31, 2012,2014, the Company’s total shareholder return and earnings per share in comparison with the peer group performed atbelow the 59th percentile.35th percentile, which was the threshold, resulting in a zero payout. When calculating total shareholder return the Company changed the stock price measurement period from a single day to a multi-day average to mitigate the influence of single day changesvolatility in stock price. This change will applyapplied for the three-year3-year cycle endingended December 31, 2014. | Level of Performance of SJI compared to Peers | Payout Earned at Close of 3-year period | | Less than 35th percentile | 0 | | 35th percentile | 50% (Minimum) | | 50th percentile | 100% (Target) | | 80th percentile | 150% (Maximum) |
Actual SJI LTIP Performance for Three Year Performance Cycles End Date of Performance Cycle | | SJI Performance as a % of Peer Group | | | Payout of LTIP | | | 12/31/2012 | | 59.2% | | | | 115.3% | | | 12/31/2013 | | 14.5% | | | | 0% | | | 12/31/2014 | | TSR = .1% | | | | 0% | | | | | EPS = 28.5% | | | | 0% | |
End Date of Performance Cycle | | SJI Performance as a % of Peer Group | | | Payout of LTIP | | | 12/31/2010 | | | 95.3 | % | | | 150 | % | | 12/31/2011 | | | 44.2 | % | | | 80.7 | % | | 12/31/2012 | | | 59.2 | % | | | 115.3 | % |
The target opportunity for the Named Executives’ long-term incentive was determined based on the 2013 Cook study. Per Cook, the long-term incentive opportunity was below the 25th percentile; and therefore, Cook recommended that increases could be considered for consistency with the Company’s targeted positioning. For 2014, increases to the long-term incentive opportunity were implemented consistent with the Cook study as follows, with the target shares awarded based on $55.96: | | | Target LTI 2013 | | | Target LTI 2014 | | | Edward J. Graham | | $ | 875,000 | | | $ | 1,081,500 | | | Stephen H. Clark | | $ | 46,155 | | | $ | 165,000 | | | Michael J. Renna | | $ | 214,500 | | | $ | 400,000 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | $ | 204,600 | | | $ | 280,000 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | $ | 185,825 | | | $ | 224,000 | |
Stock Ownership Guidelines Since 2001, the Company has had stock ownership guidelines in place for Named ExecutivesExecutive Officers to reinforce alignment with shareholders. The CEO is required to own shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value equal to a minimum of three times the CEO’s annual base salary. All other Named Executives are required to own shares of Company common stock with a market value equal to a minimum of one and one-half times their annual base salary. All Named Executive Officers required to meet their ownership guideline by end 2014 have done so. Beginning in 2015, stock ownership guidelines are increasing for the CEO to 5 times his salary and for the other Named Executive Officers to 2 times salary. Additionally, a stock holding period has been introduced that requires all of our Named Executive Officers to retain 50 percent of vested shares, net of taxes, until their new stock ownership guideline has been met. Clawback Policy Effective January 2015, the company adopted a clawback policy that applies to all short-term annual incentive awards and long-term equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers in the event of a material negative financial restatement due to fraud, negligence, or intentional misconduct. Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies Effective January 2015, the company adopted anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies that prohibit our Named Executive Officers from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions with respect to the Company’s securities. Other Benefits and Perquisites Each of our Named Executives participates in other employee benefit plans generally available to all employees (e.g., major medical and health insurance, disability insurance, 401(k) Plan) on the same terms as all other employees. In addition to those benefits, our Named Executives are eligible for the following additional benefits: Executive Pension Plans The Named Executives– All salaried employees hired prior to July 1, 2003 are eligible for benefits under a tax-qualified pension plan for salaried employees.plan. All Named Executives other than Ms. Merritt-Epps meet the eligibility requirement. Base salary plus commissions are eligible for benefitsthe only salary components considered under the pension plan. Compensation considered under the pension plan consists of base salary and incentives. Employees do not make contributions to the plan, and the employer contributions (which are based on aggregate actuarial calculations without individual allocation) are held and invested in a diversified portfolio of funds of recognized standing until they are used to provide retirement benefits. Early retirement with reduced annual benefits is permitted (but not beforebeginning at age 55).55. Named Executives, who are 50 years of age or older, are also covered by an unfunded supplemental retirement plan (the SERP). Compensation under the SERP is considered as base salary plus annual incentives. The SERP is designed to provide a Named Executive with a minimum retirement benefit from the salaried employee pension plan, and the SERP, which aggregates 2%2 percent of the average of the highest three of the final fivesix years’ salarycompensation (as defined in the plan) for each year of service plus 5%.5 percent minus the benefit received under the pension plan. For Named Executives hired on or after July 1, 2003, the SERP provides the officer with a benefit, in combination with the annuity equivalent of the employer provided benefit under the Company’s 401(k) Plan, which aggregates to 2%2 percent of the average of the highest three of the final fivesix years’ salary (as defined in the plan) for each year of service plus 5%.5 percent. Assuming continued employment and retirement at age 60, Messrs. Graham, Kindlick,Clark, Renna, DuBois and Ms. Merritt-Epps will have, respectively, 35, 34,21, 29, 32 and 21 years of credited service. No credit is provided under the SERP for more than 30 years of service. Mr. Renna and Ms. Merritt-Epps are currently not eligible for the SERP because they arehave not 50 years old.met the age requirement.
Disability Plan – Temporary disability shall be paid at a rate of 100%100 percent of the officer’s base salary, and extends at full pay for up to 120 days for Named Executives with less than five years of service, and up to 365 days for Named Executives with service of five or more years. Long-term disability (LTD), begins upon the expiration of the temporary disability benefit as described above. LTD is paid at a rate of 60%60 percent of the officer’s base salary, reduced by Social Security Disability payments, if any, up to $10,000 per month. Group Life Insurance – At a dollar equivalent of approximately two times each Named Executives’ base salary, group life insurance is rounded to the next highest $5,000 increment. The insurance premium is paid by the Company; the Named Executive is responsible for resultant federal, state or local income taxes. 24-Hour Accident Protection Coverage is provided while employed by the Company in an amount of $250,000. The insurance premium is paid by the Company; the Named Executive is responsible for resultant federal, state or local income taxes. Supplemental Survivor’s Benefit– Upon the death of any Named Executive while employed by the Company, his/her surviving beneficiary shall receive a lump sum payment of $1,000 to be paid as soon as practical following the Named Executives’ death. The surviving beneficiary will receive a lump sum death benefit based upon years of service with the Company in the amounts of six months base salary (10-15for 10-15 service years);years; nine months base salary (15-25for 15-25 service years);years; and 12 months base salary (25+for 25+ service years).years. Such payment is offset by proceeds from the Named Executives’ qualified pension plan and SERP in the year of death. Supplemental Saving Plan Contributions– The Internal Revenue Code limits the contributions that may be made by, or on behalf of, an individual under defined contribution plans such as the Company’s 401(k) Plan. The Company has adopted a policy of reimbursing its Named Executives with the amount of Company contributions that may not be made because of this limitation. This includes the tax liability incurred by the additional income. Amounts paid pursuant to this policy are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Company Automobile– The Company’s Named Executives are provided an automobile to be used for business and at the Named Executives’ discretion, for commuting and other non-business purposes. Each Named Executive is responsible for any federal and/or state income taxes that result from non-business usage. Time Off– The Company’s Named Executives may take such time off for vacation or personal needs as may be accommodated while ensuring the duties and responsibilities of his/her position are accommodated to the satisfaction of SJI’s CEO. It is anticipated that such time off would not normally exceed 20 days per calendar year, exclusive of scheduled corporate holidays. Time off does not accrue and cannot be carried over from one year to the next. Annual Physical Examination– The Company provides Named Executives with an annual physical examination at its expense. Deferred Compensation Program – Our Named Executives participate in a Restricted Stock Deferral Plan that permits them to defer all or a portion of the Company stock that they would otherwise receive under the Company’s Stock-Based Compensation Plan. 2015 Compensation Overview The Compensation Committee engaged ClearBridge Compensation Group (ClearBridge) to perform the Executive Compensation study for 2015. Market median is used as the target reference point. Based on the ClearBridge study, the Committee made the following compensation decisions: Modified our peer group to eliminate Energen (given the recent sale of its natural gas business) and added Avista Corp. (given its size and industry relevance); Awarded salary increases to each of our Named Executives based on each individual’s role, responsibility, and performance as well as the competitiveness of each individual’s salary vs. our peer group; Continued to grant 100 percent of equity as performance awards; Modified the performance measures used in our equity awards from a mix of TSR and EPS performance relative to our peers to a mix of TSR performance relative to our peers, EPS performance relative to internal goals and ROE performance relative to internal goals; Adopted stock ownership guidelines for Mr. Renna, in his role as CEO, of 5 times his salary and increased stock ownership guidelines for all other Named Executives from 1.5 times salary to 2 times salary; Adopted stock holding periods requiring all of our Named Executives to retain 50% of vested shares, net of taxes, until their new stock ownership guideline has been met; Adopted a clawback policy authorizing the Board, in the event of a material negative financial restatement due to fraud, gross negligence, or intentional misconduct by one or more officers, including our Named Executives, to require reimbursement or forfeiture of all or a portion of his/her incentive compensation, including equity compensation; and Adopted anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies prohibiting designated executive officers, including our Named Executives, from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions with respect to the Company’s securities. Employment Agreements; Change in Control Agreements The Company has employment agreements with each of its Named Executives. The agreements were for a one-year period ending December 31, 2012. Generally, these agreements protect the officer in the event of termination following a change of control and from termination for other than just cause. This protection permits the officer to focus on fulfillment of his position. If a change of control (as defined in each agreement) occurs, the agreement is automatically extended for one year from the date the change of control occurs. If there is a change of control during the term of the agreement or during the extended term of the agreement, and the Named Executive’s employment is terminated other than for cause or if a Named Executive resigns after there has been a significant adverse change of their employment arrangement with the Company due to a change of control, he is entitled to a severance payment equal to 300% of his average base compensation during the preceding five calendar years. If the Named Executive’s employment agreement is terminated for other than cause without a change of control, he is entitled to a severance payment equal to 150% of his current base salary. For a summary of the payments that would be made upon the termination or resignation of our Named Executives see “Employment Agreements; Change of Control Agreements and Other Potential Post-Employment Payments”.
At the recommendation of Cook, the Committee approved new change in control agreements for all Named Executives effective January 1, 2013 that only provide for severance benefits upon a termination following a change ofin control. The agreements also provide for reduced severance to all Named Executives other than the CEO. A summary of these agreements is set forth below: ● | The agreements provide for a three-year term compared to a one-year term; |
The agreements provide for a 3-year term compared to a 1-year term; The agreements provide that severance is payable upon an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or resignation for good reason by the Named Executive following a change in control; | The agreements provide that severance is payable upon an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or resignation for good reason by the Named Executive following a change in control. No severance is payable upon a termination without a change of control; |
Severance equals two times (three times for the CEO) base salary and average annual cash award for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination, along with the reimbursement of COBRA coverage costs for the applicable two or three year period, less the employee contribution rate. | The agreements provide for severance equal to two times TCC (three times for the CEO) along with the reimbursement of COBRA coverage costs for the applicable two- or three-year period, less the employee contribution rate. |
●Accelerated vesting of time based equity awards. Performance based awards vest to the extent provided in the award agreement evidencing the performance based awards. | Accelerated vesting of time based equity awards. Performance based awards vest only to the extent provided in the award agreement evidencing the performance based awards. |
33
The agreements include a modified cutback if any payments under the agreements (including any other agreements) would otherwise constitute a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) so that the payments will be limited to the greater of (i) the dollar amount which can be paid to the Named Executive without triggering an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or (ii) the greatest after-tax dollar amount after taking into account any excise tax incurred under Section 4999 of the Code with respect to such parachute payments.The South Jersey Industries, Inc. 1997 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2012, and the Restricted Stock Agreements governing the performance-based restricted stock grants to our Named Executives were amended in 2012 to provide for double trigger vesting of outstanding unvested awards upon a qualifying termination following a change in control. A qualifying termination includes an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or a resignation for good reason by the Named Executive, each following a change in control. Prior to this change, unvested awards vested and became non-forfeitable upon a change in control. | The agreements include a modified cutback if any payments under the agreements (including any other agreements) would otherwise constitute a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) so that the payments will be limited to the greater of (i) the dollar amount which can be paid to the Named Executive without triggering an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or (ii) the greatest after-tax dollar amount after taking into account any excise tax incurred under Section 4999 of the Code with respect to such parachute payments. |
In connection with the approval of the new change in control agreements, the Committee adopted the South Jersey Industries, Inc. Officer Severance Plan effective January 1, 2013 (the “Officer Severance Plan”). All Named Executives were designated by the Committee to participate in the Officer Severance Plan. The Officer Severance Plan provides for the following benefits upon an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or resignation for good reason by the Named Executive, absent a change in control: ●A lump sum cash payment equal to one times annual base salary; A monthly reimbursement of the COBRA premium cost for the Named Executives and their dependents (where applicable) for 12 months, less the required employee contribution rate, provided that the Named Executives are eligible for and timely elect COBRA continuation coverage; and Accelerated vesting of time-based equity awards. Performance-based awards vest to the extent provided in the award agreement evidencing the performance-based awards. | A lump sum cash payment equal to one times annual base salary; |
| A monthly reimbursement of the COBRA premium cost for the Named Executives and their dependents (where applicable) for 12 months, less the required employee contribution rate, provided that the Named Executives are eligible for and timely elect COBRA continuation coverage; and |
| Accelerated vesting of time-based equity awards. Performance-based awards vest only to the extent provided in the award agreement evidencing the performance-based awards. |
The South Jersey Industries, Inc. 1997 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2012, and the Restricted Stock Agreements governing the performance-based restricted stock grants to our Named Executives were amended in 2012 to provide for double trigger vesting of outstanding unvested awards upon a qualifying termination following a change of control. A qualifying termination includes an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or a resignation for good reason by the Named Executive, each following a change of control. Prior to this change unvested awards vest and become non-forfeitable upon a change of control.
Tax Implications Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deduction allowable for compensation paid to certain of our Named Executives up to $1 million. Qualified performance-based compensation is excluded from this limitation if certain requirements are met. Our policy is generally to preserve the federal income tax deductibility of compensation paid, to the extent feasible. Awards made under the 1997 Stock-Based Compensation Plan to employees, including Named Executives, are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation and are therefore excluded from the $1 million limitation. Shareholder approval was received in 2012 for an Annual Incentive Plan so that commencing in 2013, annual cash awards granted by the Committee under the Annual Incentive Plan could be structured to qualify for the qualified performance-based compensation exemption from Section 162(m). The Committee monitors, and will continue to monitor, the effect of Section 162(m) on the deductibility of such compensation and intends to optimize the deductibility of such compensation to the extent deductibility is consistent with the objectives of SJI’s executive compensation program. The Committee weighs the benefits of full deductibility with the other objectives of the executive compensation program and, accordingly, may from time to time pay compensation subject to the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m). Risk Assessment Taking carefully considered risk is an integral part of any business strategy; and, therefore, our executive compensation policies are not intended to eliminate all risk. However, our incentive compensation pay policies are designed to mitigate risk-taking that is short sighted or excessive. Through a combination of incentive compensation that has a short and long-term focus, the Company balances the competing interests of incentive compensation. Annual and multi-year vesting is balanced and is not overly weighted toward short-term results. Further, our metrics are quantitative and more than one metric is used to measure achievement against objectives for short-term goals. Payout schedules related to the metrics are measured after the completion of the appropriate time horizon to ensure a full assessment of the metric. Further, in formulating and reviewing our executive compensation policies, the Committee considers whether the policy’s design encourages excessive risk-taking and attaches specific measurable objectives to the extent possible. Further, for 20122014, the Human Resources Department compiled an inventory of the compensation programs administered by South Jersey Industries, including South Jersey Energy Solutions, South Jersey Gas Company and South Jersey Energy Service Plus and SJI Services, LLC.Solutions. This inventory included compensation and incentive programs for all levels of management as well as for our represented workforce. A description of each of these programs was provided to the Committee. The principal features of each program were summarized for the Committee, which included eligibility criteria, benefit formula, performance metrics, vesting schedule, manner of payment along with any other unique characteristics of the program. Along with the inventory of compensation programs, the Human ResourceResources department presented its assessment of the compensation programs and the conclusions reached by the internal Risk Management department. The Risk Management department conducted its own review of the programs. These evaluations focused on potential risks inherent in the compensation programs. Having reviewed the extensive documentation presented to it by the Company, the Committee determined that the compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect upon the Company and do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk. In addition to Committee review of compensation policies, the Company has a practice whereby its internal compensation committee, that is comprised of the Company’s senior officers who report directly to the CEO, reviews all compensation programs for all Company-wide employees for the current year and the coming year. This process entails an inventory of all compensation plans and a review across functional areas within the Company and ensures that no one individual is able to solely determine the compensation for hishis/her employees without review of the full internal compensation committee. Further, the internal compensation committee has a series of internal policies that guide its decision-making process. For example, as structural and individual changes are made to compensation throughout the year, the internal compensation committee must review a written proposal from the sponsoring executive. Our Human ResourceResources department acts as a consultant to the internal compensation committee and identifies how any proposed changes impact the organization, the employee, and what, if any, compensation policies and procedures are implicated. Through this review, any anomalies are highlighted and reviewed. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION TABLES Summary Compensation Table Name and Principal Position (a) | | Year (b) | | | Salary ($) (c) | | | Bonus ($) (d) | | | Stock Awards ($) (1) | | | Option Awards ($) (f) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (g) (4) | | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Compensation Earnings ($) (h) | | | All Other Compensation ($) (2) (i) | | | Totals ($) (j) | | | Edward J. Graham | | 2012 | | | | 669,808 | | | | - | | | | 628,301 | | | | - | | | | 510,469 | | | | 2,181,000 | | | | 34,701 | | | | 4,024,279 | | | Chairman, President and | | | 2011 | | | | 659,327 | | | | - | | | | 620,857 | | | | - | | | | 554,400 | | | | 2,304,000 | | | | 36,959 | | | | 4,175,543 | | | Chief Executive Officer | | | 2010 | | | | 624,231 | | | | - | | | | 638,757 | | | | - | | | | 624,023 | | | | 1,616,000 | | | | 32,888 | | | | 3,535,899 | | | David A. Kindlick | | | 2012 | | | | 299,683 | | | | - | | | | 180,844 | | | | - | | | | 141,750 | | | | 709,000 | | | | 15,479 | | | | 1,346,756 | | | Senior Vice President and | | | 2011 | | | | 283,341 | | | | - | | | | 164,027 | | | | - | | | | 158,760 | | | | 672,000 | | | | 16,369 | | | | 1,294,497 | | | Chief Financial Officer | | | 2010 | | | | 269,822 | | | | - | | | | 165,562 | | | | - | | | | 184,275 | | | | 650,000 | | | | 16,160 | | | | 1,285,819 | | | Michael J. Renna (3) | | | 2012 | | | | 299,673 | | | | - | | | | 180,844 | | | | - | | | | 166,800 | | | | 86,000 | | | | 15,197 | | | | 748,514 | | | President and Chief Operating Officer of South | | | 2011 | | | | 278,458 | | | | - | | | | 163,721 | | | | - | | | | 176,153 | | | | 72,000 | | | | 12,041 | | | | 702,373 | | | Jersey Energy Solutions | | | 2010 | | | | 244,637 | | | | - | | | | 150,227 | | | | - | | | | 167,937 | | | | 44,000 | | | | 11,631 | | | | 618,432 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 2012 | | | | 299,418 | | | | - | | | | 161,807 | | | | - | | | | 165,550 | | | | 735,000 | | | | 14,394 | | | | 1,376,169 | | Vice President and Senior Vice President Operations & Chief Operating | | | 2011 | | | | 257,014 | | | | - | | | | 148,847 | | | | - | | | | 143,578 | | | | 653,000 | | | | 11,903 | | | | 1,214,342 | | | Officer of South Jersey Gas Company | | | 2010 | | | | 244,712 | | | | - | | | | 150,227 | | | | - | | | | 165,375 | | | | 338,000 | | | | 11,730 | | | | 910,044 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps (3) | | | 2012 | | | | 266,726 | | | | - | | | | 128,494 | | | | - | | | | 102,094 | | | | - | | | | 22,632 | | | | 519,946 | | | General Counsel and | | | 2011 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | Corporate Secretary | | | 2010 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | | Salary ($) | | | Bonus ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) (1) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (2) | | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Compensation Earnings ($) (3) | | | All Other Compensation ($) (4) | | | Totals ($) | | Edward J. Graham Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | | | 2014 2013 2012 | | | | 720,435 699,308 669,808 | | | | - - - | | | | 937,891 830,655 628,301 | | | | 689,456 393,750 510,469 | | | | 2,482,000 0 2,181,000 | | | | 34,176 45,517 34,701 | | | | 4,863,958 1,969,230 4,024,279 | | Stephen H. Clark Chief Financial Officer | | | 2014 2013 | | | | 275,000 234,327 | | | | - - | | | | 143,115 43,814 | | | | 161,477 62,100 | | | | 663,000 68,000 | | | | 18,078 15,772 | | | | 1,260,670 424,013 | | Michael J. Renna President and Chief Operating Officer of South Jersey Energy Solutions | | | 2014 2013 2012 | | | | 398,116 329,308 299,673 | | | | - - - | | | | 346,892 203,638 180,844 | | | | 322,210 137,250 166,800 | | | | 144,000 0 86,000 | | | | 17,118 15,586 15,197 | | | | 1,228,336 685,782 748,514 | | Jeffrey E. DuBois Senior Vice President and President of South Jersey Gas Company | | | 2014 2013 2012 | | | | 349,192 319,758 299,418 | | | | - - - | | | | 242,844 194,226 161,807 | | | | 249,113 138,217 165,550 | | | | 1,076,000 136,000 735,000 | | | | 37,616 15,888 14,394 | | | | 1,954,765 804,089 1,376,169 | | Gina Merritt-Epps General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | | | 2014 2013 2012 | | | | 319,536 302,140 266,726 | | | | - - | | | | 194,266 176,404 128,494 | | | | 166,230 90,251 102,094 | | | | - - - | | | | 21,500 20,801 22,632 | | | | 701,532 589,596 519,946 | |
Footnotes to Summary Compensation Table (1) Represents the full grant date fair value of awards in connection with the grants of restricted common stock, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Footnote 2 of the Company’s financial statements for additional information, including valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the award. This amount includes the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of performance-based restricted stock grants. The maximum value of the performance-based restricted stock granted to each Named Executive is $1,406,836, $214,672, $520,339, $364,266 and $291,398 for Messrs. Graham, Clark, Renna, DuBois and Ms. Merritt-Epps, respectively. For the 20122014 grant, the Named Executives deferred their stock grants upon vesting as follows: | Named Executive | | Award | | Vest Date | Deferral Date | | Edward J. Graham | 11,618 | 12/31/14 | 19,326 | | 3/1/17 | Not Deferred | David A. KindlickStephen H. Clark | 3,344 | 12/31/14 | 2,949 | | 3/1/2017*17 | Not Deferred | | Michael J. Renna | 3,344 | 12/31/14 | 7,148 | | 3/1/17 | Not Deferred | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | 2,992 | 12/31/14 | 5,004 | | 3/1/2017**17 | 3/1/19 | | Gina Merritt-Epps | 2,376 | 12/31/14 | 4,003 | | 3/1/17 | Not Deferred |
*Payable in two(2) This amount represents the aggregate annual installments beginning in 2017.
**Payable in one installment in 2017.incentive awards paid out to each Named Executive with respect to 2012, 2013 and 2014 performance under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan.
(3) Amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each Named Executive’s accumulated benefit in the SERP. Mr. Renna and Ms. Merritt-Epps are not currently eligible for the SERP. The SERP covers officers of South Jersey Industries who have attained age 50. (2)(4) Includes employer contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan, reimbursement for 401(k) contributions not permitted under Internal Revenue Code, the value of a Company-provided automobile and the income value of group life insurance.insurance and other perquisites in excess of $10,000. The 20122014 values for these items are listed below:
| | | Edward J. Graham | | | Stephen H. Clark | | | Michael J. Renna | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 401(k) Plan | | $ | 5,434 | | | $ | 7,534 | | | $ | 6,615 | | | $ | 7,800 | | | $ | 7,031 | | | 401(k) Reimbursement | | | 13,329 | | | | - | | | | 2,229 | | | | 1,943 | | | | 1,886 | | | Group Life Insurance | | | 7,158 | | | | 2,516 | | | | 1,311 | | | | 3,320 | | | | 1,059 | | | Perquisites (a) | | | 8,255 | | | | 8,028 | | | | 6,963 | | | | 6,297 | | | | 11,524 | | | Tax Gross-Up (b) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,256 | | | | | | | Total Value | | $ | 34,176 | | | $ | 18,078 | | | $ | 17,118 | | | $ | 37,616 | | | $ | 21,500 | |
| | Edward J. Graham | | | David A. Kindlick | | | Michael J. Renna | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 401(k) Plan | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | 401(k) Reimbursement | | | 12,594 | | | | 1,490 | | | | 1,490 | | | | 1,483 | | | | 669 | | | Group Life Insurance | | | 6,666 | | | | 2,836 | | | | 981 | | | | 1,400 | | | | 802 | | | Automobile | | | 7,941 | | | | 3,652 | | | | 5,226 | | | | 4,011 | | | | 11,160 | | | Total Value | | $ | 34,701 | | | $ | 15,478 | | | $ | 15,197 | | | $ | 14,394 | | | $ | 22,631 | |
(a) The amounts of the perquisites reflect the value of the Company-provided automobile for each Named Executive. (3)(b) The amount reported for Mr. Renna is not currently eligibleDuBois reflects the value of the reimbursement of certain payroll taxes in the amount of $10,323 as a result of an inadvertent omission by the Company for Medicare taxes and a one-time gross-up on the SERP. The SERP covers officerspayroll taxes in the amount of South Jersey Industries who have attained age 50. Ms. Merritt-Epps is not currently eligible for the SERP or the Retirement Plan.$7,933.
(4) Non-equity incentive compensation in 2010 Proxy was stated at target. 2010 amounts in the above Summary Compensation 35
Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table sets forth certain information concerning the grant of awards made to our Named Executives during the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. Grants of Plan-Based Awards - 20122014 | | | | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) | | | Estimated Possible Payouts of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | | | Exercise or Base Price of Option awards ($ / Sh) | | | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (3) | | | | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) | | | Estimated Possible Payouts of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | | | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($ / Sh) | | | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (3) | | Name | Grant Date | | Threshold ($) | | | Target ($) | | | Maximum ($) | | | Threshold (#) | | | Target (#) | | | Maximum (#) | | | | | | | | Grant Date | | Threshold ($) | | | Target ($) | | | Maximum ($) | | | Threshold (#) | | | Target (#) | | | Maximum (#) | | | | Edward J. Graham | 1/03/12 | | | 0 | | | | 495,000 | | | | 742,500 | | | | 0 | | | | 11,618 | | | | 17,427 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 628,301 | | 1/03/14 | | 0 | | | 540,800 | | | 811,200 | | | 0 | | | 19,326 | | | 28,989 | | | | - | | | - | | | 937,891 | | | David A. Kindlick | 1/03/12 | | | 0 | | | | 141,750 | | | | 212,625 | | | | 0 | | | | 3,344 | | | | 5,016 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 180,844 | | | | Stephen H. Clark | | 1/03/14 | | 0 | | | 137,500 | | | 206,250 | | | 0 | | | 2,949 | | | 4,424 | | | | - | | | - | | | 143,115 | | | Michael J. Renna | 1/03/12 | | | 0 | | | | 160,000 | | | | 240,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 3,344 | | | | 5,016 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 180,844 | | 1/03/14 | | 0 | | | 280,000 | | | 420,000 | | | 0 | | | 7,148 | | | 10,722 | | | | - | | | - | | | 346,892 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | 1/03/12 | | | 0 | | | | 140,000 | | | | 210,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,992 | | | | 4,488 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 161,807 | | 1/03/14 | | 0 | | | 210,000 | | | 315,000 | | | | 0 | | | 5,004 | | | 7,506 | | | | - | | | - | | | 242,844 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | 1/03/12 | | | 0 | | | | 99,000 | | | | 148,500 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,376 | | | | 3,564 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 128,494 | | 1/03/14 | | 0 | | | 144,000 | | | 216,000 | | | | 0 | | | 4,003 | | | 6,005 | | | | - | | | - | | | 194,266 | |
Footnotes to Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table (1) Amounts represent potential cash awards payable to our Named Executives if all performance goals were achieved for 20122014 performance. Actual cash awards paid to our Named Executives for 20122014 performance are set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. (2) Represents the possible payout of shares of the performance-based restricted stock grants to each Named Executive at the end of the three-year3-year performance period. (3) Represents the full grant date fair value of the grant of restricted common stock calculated in accordance with SFASBFASB ASC Topic 718. See Footnote 1 of the financial statements for additional information, including valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the awards. Equity Awards The following table sets forth certain information concerning our outstanding restricted stock awards for our Named Executives at December 31, 2012.2014. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End - 20122014 Stock Awards | Name | Year | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (1) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (2) | | | Edward J. Graham | 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 11,618 | | | | 584,734 | | | | 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 12,188 | | | | 613,422 | | | David A. Kindlick | 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,344 | | | | 168,304 | | | | 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,220 | | | | 162,063 | | | Michael J. Renna | 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,344 | | | | 168,304 | | | | 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,214 | | | | 161,761 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,992 | | | | 150,587 | | | | 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,922 | | | | 147,064 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,376 | | | | 119,584 | | | | 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,083 | | | | 104,837 | |
| Name | | Year | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (1) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (2) | | | Edward J. Graham | | | 2014 2013 | | | | - - | | | | - - | | | | 19,326 17,385 | | | | 1,138,881 1,024,498 | | | Stephen H. Clark | | | 2014 2013 | | | | - - | | | | - - | | | | 2,949 917 | | | | 173,785 54,039 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 2014 2013 | | | | - - | | | | - - | | | | 7,148 4,262 | | | | 421,232 251,160 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 2014 2013 | | | | - - | | | | - - | | | | 5,004 4,065 | | | | 294,886 239,550 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 2014 2013 | | | | - - | | | | - - | | | | 4,003 3,692 | | | | 235,897 217,570 | |
Footnotes to Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End Table (1) Represents grants of performance-based restricted stock at target performance (100%)(100 percent). Actual shares awarded could range from 0%0 percent to 150%150 percent of target performance. (2) Market value of Company common stock at December 31, 20122014 was $50.33$58.93 and was used to calculate market value. Stock Vesting - 20122014 The following table sets forth certain information concerning the vesting of restricted stock for the Company’s Named Executives during the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. No options are outstanding and none were exercised by the Named Executives during the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. Stock Vested - 2012 2014 Stock Awards Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (1) | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (1) | | | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | | | Edward J. Graham | | | 20,642 | | | | 1,038,912 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | David A. Kindlick | | | 5,350 | | | | 269,266 | | | | Stephen H. Clark | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | 4,855 | | | | 244,352 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | 4,855 | | | | 244,352 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | 3,303 | | | | 166,240 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Footnote to Stock Vested Table (1) The dollar value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares ofPerformance based restricted stock that have vested by the market value of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date of December 31, 2012, which was $50.33.awards for 2014 were forfeited when performance targets were not achieved. Pension Benefits Table | Name | Plan Name (1) (2) | | Number of Years Credited Service Under Plan at FAS Measurement Date | | | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (3) | | | Payments During Last Fiscal Year | | | Edward J. Graham | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 32 | | | | $ 1,287,000 | | | | 0 | | | | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | 33 | | | | 10,817,000 | | | | 0 | | | Stephen H. Clark | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 17 | | | | 620,000 | | | | 0 | | | | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | 18 | | | | 1,186,000 | | | | 0 | | | Michael J. Renna (4) | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 16 | | | | 443,000 | | | | 0 | | | | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 27 | | | | 1,024,000 | | | | 0 | | | | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | 28 | | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 0 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps (5) | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | N/A | | | N/A | | | N/A | | | | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | N/A | | | N/A | | | N/A | |
| Name | Plan Name (1) (2) | | Number of Years Credited Service Under Plan at FAS Measurement Date | | | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (3) | | | Payments During Last Fiscal Year | | | | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 30 | | | $ | 986,000 | | | | 0 | | | Edward J. Graham | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | 31 | | | | 9,238,000 | | | | 0 | | | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 32 | | | | 1,207,000 | | | | 0 | | | David A. Kindlick | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | 33 | | | | 2,965,000 | | | | 0 | | Michael J. Renna (4) | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 14 | | | | 314,000 | | | | 0 | | | Retirement Plan for Employees of SJI | | | 25 | | | | 779,000 | | | | 0 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | SJI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | | 26 | | | | 2,033,000 | | | | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | SJI Supplemental | | | N/A | | | | - | | | | - | | | | Executive Retirement Plan | | | N/A | | | | - | | | | - | |
Footnotes to Pension Benefits Table (1) The South Jersey Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) provides benefits to officers of South Jersey Industries who have attained age 50. A participant is eligible for a normal retirement benefit under the SERP after having attained age 60. We base the normal retirement benefit on 2%2 percent of the participant’s “average of the highest three of the final five years’ salary”“final average compensation” multiplied by years of credited service (up to 30 years), plus an additional 5%5 percent of final average compensation. “Final average compensation” is the average of the participant’s base pay plus annual incentivecash award for the highest 3three years in the final 5six years of employment. A participant is eligible for an early retirement benefit under the SERP after having attained age 55. A participant’s early retirement benefit equals his or her normal retirement benefit reduced by 2%2 percent per year. The SERP benefit for officers hired on or after July 1, 2003 reflects a reduction for the annuity equivalent of the employer provided benefit under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. The SERP’s normal form of payment is a life annuity with six years guaranteed. (2) The Retirement Plan for Employees of South Jersey Industries, Inc. (the “Retirement Plan”) provides benefits to non-bargaining employees who wewere hired before July 1, 2003. The plan defines Normal Retirement Age as age 65. A Participant is eligible for a normal retirementnon-reduced benefit under the Retirement Plan after having attained age 65.60 with 5 years of service. We base the normal retirement benefit on the sum of (a) the participant’s accrued benefit as of September 30, 1989 increased 5%5 percent per year thereafter, and (b) 1.00%1.00 percent of the participant’s “final average compensation” plus 0.35%0.35 percent of the participant’s final average compensation in excess of covered compensation, multiplied by years of credited service after September 30, 1989 (up to 35 years less credited service as of September 30, 1989). “Final average compensation” is the average of the participant’s base pay plus annual incentivecommissions for the highest 3three years of the final 5six years of employment immediately preceding retirement. retirement, as defined by the plan. A participant is eligible for an early retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan after having attained age 55 and completed five years of service. A participant’s early retirement benefit equals his or her normal retirement benefit reduced by 2%2 percent per year prior to age 60. The Retirement Plan’s normal form of payment is a life annuity with six years guaranteed. (3) We base present values for participants on a 4.26%4.25 percent discount rate and RP-2000 mortality projected to 2013RP-2014 bases table with MP-2014 generational projection scale (postretirement only), and no preretirement decrements. (4) Mr. Renna isand Ms. Merritt Epps are not currently eligible for the SERP. The SERP covers officers of South Jersey Industries who have attained age 50. Both Mr. Renna doesand Ms. Merritt-Epps are not attain age 50eligible until 2017. (5) Ms. Merritt-Epps is not currently eligible for the SERP or the Retirement Plan.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s Restricted Stock Deferral Plan, which represents the Company’s only non-tax-qualified deferred compensation program. The Restricted Stock Deferral Plan permits the deferral of fully vested shares of restricted stock earned by the Company’s Named Executives pursuant to previously issued performance-based, restricted stock grants. The Company does not make contributions to the plan, and all earnings referenced in the table represent dividends paid on outstanding shares of common stock. | Name | Plan Name | | Executive Contributions in Last FY (1) | | | Registrant Contributions in Last FY | | | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY (2) | | | Aggregate Withdrawals Distributions | | | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE (1) (3) | | Plan Name | | Executive Contributions in Last FY (1) | | | Registrant Contributions in Last FY | | | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY (2) | | | Aggregate Withdrawals Distributions | | | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE (1) (3) | | Edward J. Graham | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | 480,853 | | | | - | | | | 71,414 | | | | 1,003,698 | | | | 2,223,321 | | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | - | | | | - | | | 72,736 | | | 600,966 | | | 2,160,674 | | David A. Kindlick | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | - | | | | - | | | | 16,943 | | | | 227,123 | | | | 527,481 | | | | Stephen H. Clark | | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | - | | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | Michael J. Renna | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | 123,459 | | | | - | | | | 12,766 | | | | 262,529 | | | | 397,455 | | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | - | | | | - | | | - | | | 154,267 | | | - | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | 120,138 | | | | - | | | | 12,474 | | | | 254,565 | | | | 386,782 | | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | - | | | | - | | | 10,295 | | | 150,158 | | | 305,816 | | Gina Merritt-Epps | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | 25,618 | | | | - | | | | 3,009 | | | | 4,571 | | | | 93,681 | | Restricted Stock Deferral Plan | | | - | | | | - | | | 7,393 | | | 37,620 | | | 219,601 | |
Footnotes to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table (1) The amounts represent the market value of vested shares of previously restricted stock deferred by the Named Executives calculated by multiplying the number of shares of deferred stock by the market value of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2012,2014, which was $50.33.$58.93. (2) The amounts represent dividends paid on the deferred common stock. These amounts are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table as they represent dividends earned on the deferred common stock, which dividends are payable on all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. (3) The amounts represent the market value of vested shares of previously restricted stock deferred by the Named Executive. The Company has, in previous years, disclosed the issuance of the restricted shares as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for such year. Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans The following table provides information as of December 31, 20122014 relating to equity compensation plans of the Company pursuant to which grants of restricted stock, options or other rights to acquire shares may be made from time to time. Equity Compensation Plan Information | Plan Category | | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (#) | | | (b) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($) (2) | | | (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans excluding securities reflected in column (a) (#) | | Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) | | | 111,705 | | | | - | | | | 103,079 | | Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | Total | | | 111,705 | | | | - | | | | 103,079 | |
Plan Category | | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (#) | | | (b) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($) (3) | | | (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans excluding securities reflected in column (a) (#) | | Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | | | 147,082 | (2) | | | - | | | | 1,117,556 | | | Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | Total | | | 147,082 | (2) | | | - | | | | 1,117,556 | |
Footnotes to Equity Compensation Plan Information (1) These plans include those used to make awards of performance-based, restricted stock to the Company’s Officers and restricted stock to the Directors. (2) This total includes 66,077 shares that had vested as of December 31, 2012 but had not yet been issued. (3) Only restricted stock has been issued. The restricted stock is issuable for no additional consideration, and therefore, the shares are not included in the calculation of weighted average exercise price in column (b).
Employment Agreements; Change of Control Agreements and Other Potential Post-Employment Payments All Named Executives are party to a Change in Control Agreement (“CIC Agreement”) that provides for severance benefits upon a termination following a change in control. A summary of the CIC Agreement terms are set below: 41
Severance is payable upon an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or resignation for good reason by the Named Executive following a change in control; Severance equals two times (three times for the CEO) base salary and average annual cash award for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination, along with the reimbursement of COBRA coverage costs for the applicable two or three year period, less the employee contribution rate; and Accelerated vesting of all time based equity awards while performance based awards vest to the extent provided in the award agreement evidencing the performance based award. In addition to the CIC Agreements, all Named Executives participate in the South Jersey Industries, Inc. Officer Severance Plan effective January 1, 2013 (the “Officer Severance Plan” that provides for the following benefits upon an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or resignation for good reason by the Named Executive, absent a change in control: A lump sum cash payment equal to one times annual base salary; A monthly reimbursement of the COBRA premium cost for the Named Executives and their dependents (where applicable) for 12 months, less the required employee contribution rate, provided that the Named Executives are eligible for and timely elect COBRA continuation coverage; and Accelerated vesting of all time-based equity awards while performance-based awards vest to the extent provided in the award agreement evidencing the performance-based awards. South Jersey Industries entered into certain agreements and maintains certain plans that will require the Company to provide compensation to Named Executives39
Below is an estimate of the Company inamounts payable to each Named Executive under the event ofCIC Agreements and the Officer Severance Plan, assuming a termination of employment or a change in the Company’s control with a qualifying termination. We listed the amount of compensation payable to each named executive in each situation in the table below.on December 31, 2014. Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Retirement | | | Termination by the Company for Cause | | | Termination by the Officer for Good Reason or by the Company without Cause following a CIC | | | Termination by the Officer for Good Reason or by the Company without Cause without a CIC | | Edward J. Graham Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,946,451 | | | $ | 748,705 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 1,100,753 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 2,163,379 | | | $ | 0 | | Stephen H. Clark Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 738,348 | | | $ | 303,270 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 133,870 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 227,824 | | | $ | 0 | | Michael J. Renna Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,197,033 | | | $ | 426,368 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 672,392 | | | $ | 0 | | Jeffrey E. DuBois Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,074,928 | | | $ | 377,462 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 276,441 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 534,436 | | | $ | 0 | | Gina Merritt-Epps Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 908,795 | | | $ | 343,919 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 453,467 | | | $ | 0 | |
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Retirement | | | Termination by the Companies for Cause | | | Termination by the Officer for Good Reason following a CIC | | | Termination by the Companies for Other than Cause following a CIC | | | Termination by the Companies for Other than Cause without a CIC | | | Edward J. Graham | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,966,463 | | | $ | 4,966,463 | | | $ | 1,025,000 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 603,859 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,198,156 | | | $ | 1,198,156 | | | $ | 0 | | | Incremental Nonqualified Pension | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 2,777,000 | | | David A. Kindlick | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,796,459 | | | $ | 1,796,459 | | | $ | 470,000 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 164,143 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 330,367 | | | $ | 330,367 | | | $ | 0 | | | Incremental Nonqualified Pension | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,409,000 | | | Michael J. Renna | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,464,452 | | | $ | 1,464,452 | | | $ | 470,000 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 330,065 | | | $ | 330,065 | | | $ | 0 | | | Incremental Nonqualified Pension | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | Jeffrey E. DuBois | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,289,801 | | | $ | 1,289,801 | | | $ | 484,250 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 301,174 | | | $ | 301,174 | | | $ | 0 | | | Incremental Nonqualified Pension | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,206,000 | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 580,316 | | | $ | 580,316 | | | $ | 432,875 | | | Equity Compensation | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 224,421 | | | $ | 224,421 | | | $ | 0 | | | Incremental Nonqualified Pension | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Below is a description of the assumptions that we used in determining the payments in the tables above upon termination as of December 31, 2012:2014: Retirement Named Executive retiresExecutives retire from the Company upon attaining both 55 years of age and 10 years of continuous service with the Company. Change in Control (CIC) A change ofin control shall generally mean any of the following: (1) consummation of any paya merger or proposal forconsolidation of the Company with another corporation where the shareholders of the Company, immediately prior to the merger liquidation, dissolution or acquisitionconsolidation, will not own 50 percent or more of SJIthe shares of the surviving corporation; (2) sale or all orother disposition of substantially all of its assets; (2)the assets of the Company; (3) election to the Board of Directors of SJI a new majority different from the current slate, unless each such new director stands for election as a management nominee and is elected by shareholders immediately prior to the election of any such new majority; or (3)(4) the acquisition by any person(s) of 20%30 percent or more of the stock of SJI having general voting rights in the election of directors. The new change in control agreements for all Named Executives only provide for severance benefits upon a termination following a change in control and include a modified change in control definition. The agreements also provide for reduced severance to all Named Executives other than the CEO as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. These agreements are effective January 1, 2013. Cash Compensation Termination following a Change of Control (Good Reason or Without Cause) – The Company shall paySeverance equals two times (three times for the Named Executives as severance pay an amount equal to 300% of aCEO) base amount determined to be thesalary and average annual compensation paid tocash award for the Named Executives during the five calendarthree fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination, along with the reimbursement of COBRA coverage costs for the applicable two or three year period, less the employee contribution rate as reported on their Forms W-2. Eachset forth above. The CIC Agreements include a modified cutback if any payments under the agreements (including any other agreements) would otherwise constitute a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code so that the payments will be limited to the greater of (i) the dollar amount which can be paid to the Named Executive is also entitled to reasonable outplacement services, not to exceed $15,000, or at the discretion of the CEO, $20,000. We have assumed $20,000 for purposes of the above cash compensation disclosure. The employment agreements require that such severance pay shall be reduced to the largest amount as will result in no payment being subject to thewithout triggering an excise tax imposed byunder Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) the greatest after-tax dollar amount after taking into account any excise tax incurred under Section 4999 of the severance pay and any other payment a Named Executive would be entitledCode with respect to receive under any other agreement (the “280G Cutback”).such parachute payments. The only other payments that would be considered parachute payments upon a change ofin control is the acceleration of unvested restricted stock awards. AsMessrs. Graham and Renna may be subject to a resultcutback under Section 280G of the 280G Cutback,Code pursuant to the cash compensation payable to Messrs. Graham, Kindlick, Renna and, DuBois, andabove provision. Ms. Merritt-Epps upon a termination following a changemay be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of controlthe Code but would be reduced to approximatelyreceive the following amounts: $3,728,306, $1,426,091, $1,094,386, $948,626greatest after-tax amount after paying any applicable excise tax and $315,894. Thisthus no cutback would apply. The 280G Cutback analysis does not reflect any allocation of payments that may be made with respect to applicable non-compete provisions, reasonable compensation or any ameliorative tax planning strategies. Termination for Other than Cause or for Good Reason without a Change ofin Control– The Company shall pay the each Named Executive as severance pay an amount equal to 150%100% of the Named Executives’ base salary, to be paid out in 18 equal monthly installments. We have assumed $20,000along with COBRA reimbursement for outplacement services for purposes of this cash compensation disclosure.the same 12 month period. Equity Compensation Retirement – Named Executives are entitled to pro-rated monthly vesting upon retirement, based on the applicable three-year3-year performance period. The amount for Mr.Messrs. Graham, Clark and Mr. Kindlick,DuBois who are the only Named Executive eligible for retirement, represents the pro-rated value of outstanding target shares from the 20112013 and 20122014 restricted stock awards. Change ofin Control – Upon a qualifying termination following a change ofin control, all unvested restricted stock awards that are outstanding vest and pay at target level performance. A qualifying termination includes an involuntary termination without cause by the Company or a resignation for good reason by the Named Executive, each following a change ofin control. The amounts disclosed represent the value of outstanding 20112013 and 20122014 awards based on target level performance. Stock Price – Assumed to be $50.33$58.93 based on the closing price as of December 31, 2012.2014. Incremental Nonqualified Pension40
Termination by the Companies Other than for Cause without a Change of Control – For purposes of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), 18 months shall be included as service credit and the severance amount shall be considered in the final average earnings calculation. Mr. Graham, Mr. Kindlick and, Mr. DuBois are currently eligible to receive a SERP benefit.
Final Average Earnings (“FAE”) – FAE means the average base salary plus annual cash earned for that calendar year for the highest 3 years of the final 5 years of employment. The FAEs were based on the base salary for 2012, 2011 and 2010 plus the severance pay.
Present Values – 4.26% discount rate and RP-2000 mortality projected to 2013 (postretirement only), and no pre-retirement decrements. Assumes normal form of payment is a life annuity with six years guaranteed.
EXHIBIT A
Participant List
AGL Resources | Alliant Energy | Atmos Energy Corporation | Avista Corporation | Cascade Natural Gas Corporation | CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | Central Hudson Gas & Electric | Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | Citizens Gas & Coke Utility | Colorado Springs Utilities | Constellation Energy | Consumers Energy Company | Dominion Resources, Inc. | DTE Energy | Duke Energy Corporation | Energen Corporation | Energy South, Inc. | Entergy Corporation | EON US LLC | Equitable Utilities | Exelon Corporation | Gainesville Regional Utilities | Integrys Energy Group | Intermountain Gas Company | Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company | Knoxville Utilities Board | Laclede Gas | Memphis Light, Gas & Water | Metropolitan Utilities District | Middle Tenn. Natural Gas Company | Montana Dakota Utilities | Mountaineer Gas Company | National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation | National Gas & Oil Cooperative | National Grid | New Jersey Resources Corporation | NICOR, Inc. | NiSource, Inc. | Northwest Natural Gas Company | North Western Energy LLC | NSTAR | Oneok, Inc. | Pepco Holdings | Philadelphia Gas Works | Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. | Puget Sound Energy | Questar Corporation | SEMCO Energy | Sempra Energy | Source Gas | South Jersey Gas Company | Southern California Gas Company | Southern Union Company | Southwest Gas Corporation | UGI Utilities, Inc. | Vectren Corporation | Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. | Washington Gas Light Company | Westfield Gas & Electric Light | Xcel Energy, Inc. |
EXHIBIT B
Energy Database
Company Name | Sector | T.D. Williamson, Inc. | Energy | Hess Corporation | Energy | Sierra Southwest Co-Op Services, Inc. | Energy | Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. | Energy | Southern Company | Energy | Southern Company -Alabama Power | Energy | Southern Company - Georgia Power | Energy | Southern Company - Southern Nuclear Operating Company | Energy | Southern Company - Mississippi Power | Energy | Southwest Gas Corporation | Energy | New York Power Authority | Energy | City of Philadelphia - Philadelphia Gas Works | Energy | Powersouth | Energy | Atmos Energy Corporation | Energy | Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division | Energy | California Independent System Operator Corporation | Energy | United Illuminating Corporation | Energy | Unitil Corporation | Energy | CHS, Inc. | Energy | Mirant Corporation | Energy | ElectriCities of North Carolina | Energy | CenterPoint Energy | Energy | Dominion Resources, Inc. | Energy | Dominion Resources, Inc. - Dominion Energy | Energy | Dominion Resources, Inc. - Dominion Generation Corporation | Energy | Dominion Resources, Inc. - VA Power | Energy | Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company | Energy |
Public Works Commission of Fayetteville, North Carolina | Energy | PJM Interconnection, LLC | Energy | PG&E Corporation - Pacific Gas and Electric Company | Energy | Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. | Energy | FirstEnergy | Energy | Allegheny Energy, Inc. | Energy | AGL Resources, Inc. | Energy | GDF SUEZ Energy - United Water | Energy | GDF SUEZ Energy North America | Energy | GDF SUEZ Energy-SUEZ Energy Generation North America | Energy | GDF SUEZ Energy-SUEZ Energy LNG North America | Energy | GDF SUEZ Energy-SUEZ Energy Marketing North America | Energy | GDF SUEZ Energy-SUEZ Energy Retail North America | Energy | American Transmission Co. LLC | Energy | PNM Resources Inc. | Energy | Edison International - Edison Mission Energy | Energy | Energy Future Holdings | Energy | Energy Future Holdings - Luminant | Energy | Energy Future Holdings - Luminant Energy | Energy | Energy Future Holdings - Oncor Electric Delivery Company | Energy | Energy Future Holdings - TXU Energy | Energy | Old Dominion Electric Cooperative | Energy | Central Vermont Public Service Corporation | Energy | Petrobras Americas Inc | Energy | Wood Mackenzie | Energy | DPL Inc. | Energy | Orlando Utilities Commission | Energy | City of Austin - Austin Energy | Energy | E.ON U.S., LLC | Energy | Duquesne Light | Energy | Vopak North America | Energy | NuStar Energy L.P. | Energy | Cheniere Energy, lnc. | Energy | CGGVentas | Energy | L/B Water Service | Energy | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | Energy | Florida Municipal Power Agency | Energy | South Jersey Industries | Energy | South Jersey Industries - South Jersey Energy Solutions | Energy | South Jersey Industries - South Jersey Gas Company | Energy | AES Corporation | Energy | Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency | Energy |
General Industry Database
Company Name | Sector | Johnson County Government | General Market | Community Options, Inc. | General Market | New York City Department of Education | General Market | Tipp Enterprises - Novamex | General Market | Laureate Education, Inc | General Market | American Institute of Graphic Arts (AlGA) | General Market | Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants | General Market | Kforce, Inc | General Market | Telefonica International Wholesale Services | General Market | City of Austin, TX | General Market | Sleep Innovations | Industrial | International Fellowship Of Christians & Jews | General Market | Chicago Province of the Society of Jesus | General Market | Pharmacy Onesource, Inc. | General Market | Shippensburg University Foundation | General Market | Rochester Institute of Technology | General Market | Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association | General Market | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | General Market | Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers | General Market | Healthcare Information Management Systems Society | General Market | Bureau Veritas | General Market |
FMC Corporation | Chemical | FMC Corporation - Agricultural Products Group | Chemical | FMC Corporation - Industrial Chemicals Group | Chemical | FMC Corporation - Specialty Chemicals Group | Chemical | PPG Industries Inc. - Chemicals | Chemical | PPG Industries Inc. - Coatings & Resins | Chemical | PPG Industries Inc. - Corporate | Chemical | PPG Industries Inc. - Glass | Chemical | Honeywell - Specialty Materials | Chemical | Eastman Chemical | Chemical | Umicore | Chemical | Ashland, Inc. - Aqualon Functional Ingredients | Chemical | Ashland, Inc. - Ashland Distribution | Chemical | Ashland, Inc. - Consumer Markets | Chemical | Ashland, Inc. - Corporate | Chemical | Ashland, Inc. - Hercules Water Technologies | Chemical | Ashland, Inc. - Performance Materials | Chemical | Tronox Incorporated | Chemical | Sunoco, Inc. - Chemical Division | Chemical | INVISTA | Chemical | Dow Chemical Company, The | Chemical | Dow Chemical Company, The - Dow AgroSciences | Chemical | Dow Corning Corporation | Chemical | E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | Chemical | Occidental Petroleum Corporation - Occidental Chemical Corp. | Chemical | Calgon Carbon | Chemical | Olin Corporation - Chlor Alkali | Chemical | Arkema | Chemical | Solvay America - Solvay Solexis | Chemical | Solvay America Inc. | Chemical | Solvay America Inc. - Solvay Advanced Polymers, Inc. | Chemical | Solvay America Inc. - Solvay Chemicals | Chemical | Solvay America Inc. - Solvay lnformation Technologies | Chemical | Chemtura Corporation | Chemical | Bayer Material Science | Chemical | Mosaic Company, The | Chemical | Air Products and Chemicals | Chemical | Rhodia | Chemical | BASF | Chemical | BASF - Ciba Specialty Chemicals | Chemical | Arch Chemicals, Inc. | Chemical | H.B. Fuller Company | Chemical | Williams Companies, Inc. | Chemical | Cognis | Chemical | Roquette America | Chemical | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Specialty Chemicals | Chemical | Praxair, Inc. | Chemical | NewMarket Corporation | Chemical | Georgia Gulf Corporation | Chemical | lneos Group Limited | Chemical | Air Liquide America | Chemical | Cabot Corporation | Chemical | MacDermid | Chemical | EMD Chemicals Inc | Chemical | Evonik Degussa Corporation | Chemical | Linde Group, North America Inc. | Chemical | Millennium Inorganic Chemicals | Chemical | NOVA Chemicals, Inc. Lubrizol Corporation, The | Chemical | LyondellBasell North America - Lyondell | Chemical | Clariant Corporation | Chemical | International Flavors & Fragrances | Chemical | Agrium, Inc. - US | Chemical | Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. | Chemical | Huntsman- Textile Effects | Chemical | Cytec Industries Inc. | Chemical | Lonza Inc. | Chemical | Akzo Nobel | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - Car Refinishes | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - Functional Chemicals | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - Industrial Finishes | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - International Paint LLC | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - National Starch | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - Powder Coatings | Chemical | Akzo Nobel - Pulp & Paper Chemicals | Chemical | Akzo Nobel- Surfactants | Chemical |
TOTAL S.A- Total Petrochemicals USA | Chemical | Sasol North America, Inc. | Chemical | lnfineum USA L.P. | Chemical | Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC | Chemical | Champion Technologies | Chemical | Champion Technologies - Corsicana Technologies | Chemical | Shepherd Color Company | Chemical | Buckman Laboratories | Chemical | lnnophos, Inc. | Chemical | LANXESS | Chemical | Westlake Chemical Corporation | Chemical | Siegwerk USA Inc | Chemical | Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc. | Chemical | Michelman Inc. | Chemical | Baker Petrolite | Chemical | Sika Corporation | Chemical | Bluestar Silicones | Chemical | Zep Inc. | Chemical | Canexus | Chemical | SABIC Innovative Plastics US LLC | Chemical | GEO Specialty Chemicals | Chemical | Nitto Denko America – Permacel Automotive | Chemical | Americas Styrenics | Chemical | ICL Industrial Products | Chemical | DSM Nutritional Products, Inc. | Chemical | DSM Resins U.S. Inc. - DSM Chemicals North America, Inc. | Chemical | Firmenich, Incorporated | Chemical | OCI Chemical | Chemical | Borealis Compounds Inc. | Chemical | Ferro Corporation | Chemical | Southern Company | Industrial | FirstEnergy Corp. | Industrial | Weston Solutions | Industrial | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | Industrial | Zachry Construction Corporation | Industrial | Granite Construction Incorporated | Industrial | Day & Zimmermann | Industrial | Gilbane, Inc. | Industrial | Bovis Lend Lease | Industrial | McCarthy Building Companies Inc. | Industrial | PCL Construction Enterprises Inc. | Industrial | Tishman Realty & Construction Co. Inc. | Industrial | Turner Construction Company | Industrial | Wertz Company | Industrial | NACCO Materials Handling Group | Industrial | Bridgestone Americas, Inc. | Industrial | Saint-Gobain Corporation | Industrial | Voith - Voith Hydro Inc. | Industrial | Voith - Voith Paper Fabric & Roll Systems Inc | Industrial | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | Industrial | Michelin North America | Industrial | Flowserve Corporation | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - Coatings | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - Corporate | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - International | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - Irrigation | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - Structures Division | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - Tubing | Industrial | Valmont Industries, Inc. - Utilities | Industrial | Marmon Group, Inc., The - Union Tank Car | Industrial | Hexagon Metrology, Inc. | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd.- B-Line | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Bussmann | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Cooper Tools | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Corporate | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Crouse-Hinds ECM | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Lighting | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Power Systems | Industrial | Cooper Industries, Ltd. - Wiring Devices | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson - Building Products | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson - Canada Region | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson - Lehigh White | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson- North Region | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson - South Region | Industrial | Lehigh Hanson- West Region | Industrial | Ingersoll Rand Company Limited | Industrial | Ingersoll Rand Company Limited- Climate Control | Industrial |
Ingersoll Rand Company Limited - Enterprise Services | Industrial | Ingersoll Rand Company Limited - Industrial Technologies | Industrial | Ingersoll Rand Company Limited - Security Technologies | Industrial | Ingersoll Rand Company Limited - Trane Residential | Industrial | Caterpillar Inc. | Industrial | Joy Global, Inc. | Industrial | Joy Global, Inc. - Joy Mining Machinery | Industrial | SPX Corporation | Industrial | Modine Manufacturing Company | Industrial | Belden | Industrial | Wienerberger- General Shale Brick. Inc. | Industrial | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | Industrial | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Industrial | Pilkington | Industrial | Eaton Corporation | Industrial | Noranda Aluminum | Industrial | Noranda Aluminum - Gramercy | Industrial | Noranda Aluminum - Noranda Primary | Industrial | Noranda Aluminum - Norandal | Industrial | ArcelorMittal Tubular Products | Industrial | ArcelorMittal Tubular Products | Industrial | ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Mechanical | Industrial | Sonoco Products Company | Industrial | CNH Global N.V. | Industrial | Andersons, Inc., The | Industrial | Cargill, Inc. | Industrial | American Crystal Sugar Company | Industrial | Hallmark Cards, Inc. | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corp - Community Development & Land Management | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Calmar | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Consumer & Office Products | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Consumer Solutions | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Corporate | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Global Business Services | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Packaging Resource Group | Industrial | MeadWestvaco Corporation - Specialty Papers | Industrial | Deere & Company | Industrial | Associated Materials, Inc. | Industrial | Mitsubishi lnternational Corporation | Industrial | Hilti - US | Industrial | Newark InOne | Industrial | ABB, Inc. | Industrial | FANUC CNC America Corporation | Industrial | Hillwood Development Corporation | Industrial | Matthews International Corporation | Industrial | Huhtamaki | Industrial | CHS, Inc. (307511) | Industrial | Tate & Lyle Americas | Industrial | Tate & Lyle Americas - Custom Ingredients | Industrial | Tate & Lyle Americas - Ingredients | Industrial | Americas Tate & Lyle Americas - Tate & Lyle | Industrial | Sucralose Amsted Industries, Inc. - Amsted Rail | Industrial | Amsted Industries, Inc. - Baltimore Aircoil | Industrial | Amsted Industries, Inc. - Burgess Norton | Industrial | Amsted Industries, Inc. - Consolidated Metco Inc. | Industrial | Amsted Industries, Inc. - Corporate | Industrial | Amsted Industries, Inc. - Diamond Chain | Industrial | Amsted lndustries, Inc. - Griffin Pipe | Industrial | Amsted Industries, Inc. - Means Industries, Inc. | Industrial | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Industrial | Ensign-Bickford Industries | Industrial | Brambles | Industrial | Johnson Controls | Industrial | FM Global | Industrial | PCS - Potash | Industrial | Plastic Omnium | Industrial | Benteler North America | Industrial | BMW Manufacturing | Industrial | ZF Group North American Operations | Industrial |
GrafTech International, LTD | Industrial | Southern Star Concrete | Industrial | Griffith Laboratories USA | Industrial | Eagle Ottawa, LLC | Industrial | Groupe SEB | Industrial | Denso Manufacturing | Industrial | Armacell LLC | Industrial | Day & Zimmermann | Industrial | Ford Motor | Industrial | MonierLifetile LLC | Industrial | Handy & Harman | Industrial | Dawn Food Products, Inc. | Industrial | Lenzing Fibers Inc - Hahl | Industrial | Lenzing Fibers Inc. | Industrial | Lopez Foods | Industrial | Ply Gem Siding Group | Industrial | Bunge North America, Inc. | Industrial | BELIMO Americas | Industrial | Ball Corporation | Industrial | Agfa Corporation | Industrial | Agfa Corporation - Agfa Materials | Industrial | S&B Industrial Minerals S.A. - N.A | Industrial | S&B Industrial Minerals S.A. - Stollberg Inc | Industrial | Bal-Seal Engineering Inc | Industrial | Sitel Semiconductor | Industrial | Amcor Limited | Industrial | Amcor Limited - Amcor PET Packaging | Industrial | Glatfelter | Industrial | WireCo World Group Inc. | Industrial | Vallourec | Industrial | Danfoss | Industrial | Howden Buffalo Inc. | Industrial | ASML | Industrial | TomTom, Inc. | Industrial | ltalcementi | Industrial | Flexco | Industrial | Archer Daniels Midland | Chemical | Konica Minolta Graphics Imaging, Inc | Industrial | Barnes Group Inc. | Industrial | PERl USA | Industrial | Anonymous Industrial Company | Industrial | Thomas Steel Strip Corp. | Industrial | Jaguar Land Rover NA | Industrial | Southco, Inc. | Industrial | Forbo Flooring | Industrial | Siemens Corporation | Industrial | Mersen Group | Industrial | United States Steel Corporation | Industrial | Gerdau AmeriSteel Corporation | Industrial | ArcelorMittal | Industrial | AK Steel Corporation | Industrial | Severstal - Severstal North America | Industrial | CSN | Industrial |
EXHIBIT C
Proxy Position 1
and Chief
Executive Officer
| Top Financial
Position
| Proxy Position 3 | Proxy Position 4 | Proxy Position 5 | Atmos Energy Corp. | Atmos Energy Corp. | Atmos Energy Corp. | Atmos Energy Corp. | Atmos Energy Corp. | Nicor, Inc. | New Jersey Resources Corp. | New Jersey Resources Corp. | Nicor, Inc. | Nicor, Inc. | New Jersey Resources Corp. | WGL Holdings Inc. | WGL Holdings Inc. | New Jersey Resources Corp. | New Jersey Resources Corp. | WGL Holdings, Inc. | Southern Union Co. | Southern Union Co. | WGL Holdings Inc. | WGL Holdings, Inc. | Southern Union Co. | AGL Resources Inc. | AGL Resources Inc. | Southern Union Co. | Southern Union Co. | AGL Resources Inc. | Vectren Corp. | Vectren Corp. | AGL Resources Inc. | AGL Resources Inc. | Vectren Corp. | Southwest Gas Corp. | Southwest Gas Corp. | Vectren Corp. | Vectren Corp. | Southwest Gas Corp. | Laclede Group Inc. | Laclede Group Inc. | Southwest Gas Corp. | Southwest Gas Corp. | Laclede Group Inc. | Piedmont Natural Gas Co. Inc. | Piedmont Natural Gas Co. Inc. | Laclede Group Inc. | Laclede Group Inc. | Piedmont Natural Gas Co. lnc. | Energen Corp. | Energen Corp. | Piedmont Natural Gas Co. lnc. | Piedmont Natural Gas Co. lnc. | Energen Corp. | CH Energy Group Inc. | CH Energy Group Inc. | Energen Corp. | Energen Corp. | CH Energy Group Inc. | Northwest Natural Gas Co. | Northwest Natural Gas Co. | CH Energy Group Inc. | CH Energy Group Inc. | Northwest Natural Gas Co. | Black Hills Corp/SD | Black Hills Corp/SD | Northwest Natural Gas Co. | Northwest Natural Gas Co. | Black Hills Corp/SD | Chesapeake Utilities Corp. | Chesapeake Utilities Corp. | Black Hills Corp/SD | Black Hills Corp/SD | Chesapeake Utilities Corp. | | | Chesapeake Utilities Corp. | Chesapeake Utilities Corp. |
The graph below compares the cumulative total return on the Company’s Common Stock for the 5- year5-year period ended December 31, 20122014 with the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 and the S&P Utility Indexes. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 20072009 in the Company’s Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Utility Index and that all dividends were reinvested. Standard & Poor’s Utilities Index is a commonly used indicator of utility common stock performance based on companies considered electric, gas or water utilities that operate as independent producers and/or distributors of power. For the 5-year period ending December 31, 2012,2014, investors received a 10.2%12.5 percent annualized total return compared with the 1.7%15.5 percent and 0.4%13.3 percent returns from the S&P 500 Index and S&P Utility Index, respectively. The annual growth rate for 20122014 for the Company was (8.5)%.8.9 percent. This compares with 1.6%13.7 percent for the S&P 500 and 1.3%29.0 percent for the S&P Utility Index. Indexed Total Return Over 5 Years Assuming Dividends Reinvested | S&P 500 | 100 | 115.1 | 117.5 | 136.3 | 180.4 | 205.1 | | S&P UTIL | 100 | 105.5 | 126.5 | 128.1 | 145.0 | 187.0 | | SJI | 100 | 142.4 | 157.5 | 144.1 | 165.3 | 180.0 |
ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIALFINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20122014 accompanies this proxy statement. The Annual Report is not proxy-soliciting material or a communication by which any solicitation is made. Upon written request of any person who on the record date for the Annual Meeting was a record owner of the Common Stock, or who represents in good faith that he or she was on that date a beneficial owner of such stock and is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, the Company will send to that person, without charge, a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2012,2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Requests for this report should be directed to Gina Merritt-Epps, CorporateGeneral Counsel and Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries, Inc., 1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, New Jersey 08037.
| | By Order of the Board of Directors, | | | | | | | Gina Merritt-Epps | | | | General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | | | | | March 18, 201330, 2015 | | |
52SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC.
APPENDIX A1. Purpose
The purpose of the Plan is to enable the Company to recognize the contributions made to the Company by employees (including employees who are members of the Board) and Non-Employee Directors of the Company by providing such persons with additional incentive to devote themselves to the future success of the Company and to improve the ability of the Company to attract, retain and motivate persons upon whom the Company’s sustained growth and financial success depend, by: (a) providing incentive compensation opportunities competitive with those of other major companies; (b) providing performance-related incentives that motivate superior performance; and (c) providing such persons with the opportunity to acquire or increase their ownership interest in the Company and to thereby acquire a greater stake in the Company and a closer identity with it. 2. Definitions Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms will have the respective meanings set forth below: Peer (a) “Award” means a Stock Award, Stock Unit, Option, SAR, Other Stock-Based Award or Cash Incentive Award granted under the Plan.
(b) “Award Agreement” means the written instrument that sets forth the terms and conditions of an Award, including all amendments thereto. (c) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Parent Company. (d) “Cash Incentive Award” means a cash bonus award, as described in Section 12. (e) “Cause” has the meaning set forth in any written agreement between the Grantee and the Company, or if there is no such agreement or the agreement does not define “Cause” then “Cause” means conduct by a Grantee involving one or more of the following: (i) the willful and continued failure by the Grantee to substantially perform his or her duties other than any such failure resulting from the Grantee’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness or injury, provided that the Board of Directors of the Company or the Chief Executive Officer has provided written notice of termination for Cause to the Grantee, and the Grantee has not corrected the act or failure to act that constitutes the grounds for Cause as set forth in the Company’s notice of termination within 30 days of the Grantee’s receipt of the notice; (ii) the Grantee’s conviction of, plea of no contest to, or plea of nolo contendere to, a crime under state or federal law; (iii) willful misconduct by the Grantee which is materially injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise; or (iv) the Grantee’s unlawful use (including being under the influence) or possession of illegal drugs on the Company’s premises or while performing the Grantee’s duties and responsibilities. (f) “Change in Control” means any of the following: (i) the consummation of (A) a merger or consolidation of the Company with another corporation where the shareholders of the Parent Company immediately prior to the merger or consolidation will not beneficially own immediately after the merger or consolidation, shares entitling such shareholders to more than 50% of all votes to which all shareholders of the surviving corporation would be entitled in the election of directors (without consideration of the rights of any class of stock to elect directors by a separate class vote), or (B) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Parent Company; (ii) directors are elected such that a majority of the members of the Board shall have been members of the Board for less than two years, unless each such new director who was not a director at the beginning of such two year period stands for election as a management nominee (which shall in no event include directors nominated by hostile shareholders) and is elected by shareholders immediately prior to the election of any such new majority; or (iii) any “person” (as such term is used in sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Parent Company representing more than 30% of the voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Parent Company; provided that a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur for purposes of this subsection (iii) as a result of (A) a transaction in which the Parent Company becomes a subsidiary of another corporation and in which the shareholders of the Parent Company, immediately prior to the transaction, will beneficially own, immediately after the transaction, shares entitling such shareholders to more than 30% of all votes to which all shareholders of the parent corporation would be entitled in the election of directors (without consideration of the rights of any class of stock to elect directors by a separate class vote) or (B) an increase in any person’s beneficial ownership of securities of the Parent Company in connection with one or more Parent Company stock repurchase transactions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for any Awards subject to the requirements of section 409A of the Code that will become payable on a Change in Control, the transaction constituting a “Change in Control” must also constitute a “change in control event” for purposes of section 409A(a)(2)(A)(v) of the Code. (g) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. (h) “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or another committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan, provided, however, that grant decisions made hereunder shall be made by the Board. All Board action shall be by the (i) “outside directors” as defined under section 162(m) of the Code, (ii) “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and (iii) “independent directors” under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange or such other securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed. A majority of the independent directors of the Company, in their sole discretion, may exercise any or all authority of the Committee under the Plan in lieu of the Committee, and in such instances references herein to the Committee shall be deemed to refer to such directors. (i) “Company” means South Jersey Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries and any successor corporation, as determined by the Board. (j) “Common Stock” means the common stock of the Parent Company. (k) “Disability” or “Disabled” means a Grantee becoming disabled within the meaning of section 22(e)(3) of the Code. (l) “Dividend” shall mean a dividend paid on shares of Company Stock. (m) “Dividend Equivalent” means an amount calculated with respect to a Stock Unit, which is determined by multiplying the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Stock Unit by the per-share cash Dividend, or the per-share fair market value (as determined by the Board) of any Dividend in consideration other than cash, paid by the Company on its Common Stock. If interest is credited on accumulated dividend equivalents, the term “Dividend Equivalent” shall include the accrued interest. (n) “Effective Date” of the Plan means the date of the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, provided that the Plan is approved by the shareholders of the Company as of that date. (o) “Eligible Participant” has the meaning set forth in Section 6(a). (p) “Employee” means an employee of the Employer (including an officer or director who is also an employee), but excluding any person who is classified by the Employer as a “contractor” or “consultant,” no matter how characterized by the Internal Revenue Service, other governmental agency or a court. Any change of characterization of an individual by the Internal Revenue Service or any court or government agency shall have no effect upon the classification of an individual as an Employee for purposes of this Plan, unless the Board determines otherwise. (q) “Employer” means the Company and its subsidiaries. (r) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (s) “Exercise Price” means the per share price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under an Option, as designated by the Board. (t) “Fair Market Value” of Common Stock means, unless the Board determines otherwise with respect to a particular Award, the closing price of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the relevant date (or if there were no trades on that date) the last reported sale price of Common Stock during regular trading hours on the latest preceding date upon which a sale was reported. If the Common Stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the Fair Market Value shall be as determined by the Board on the basis of available prices for such Common Stock or in such manner as may be authorized by applicable regulations under the Code. (u) “Good Reason” has the meaning set forth in any written agreement between the Grantee and the Company, or if there is no such agreement or the agreement does not define “Good Reason,” then “Good Reason” means any of the following: (i) a material diminution in the Grantee’s authority, duties or responsibilities, or any removal of the Grantee from or any failure to re-elect the Grantee to any such positions, other than a failure to re-elect the Grantee to the Board of Directors of the Company by the Company’s stockholders; (ii) a material reduction in the Grantee’s base salary, other than in connection with an across-the-board, proportional reduction in annual base salary affecting all similarly-situated executives of the Company; (iii) the taking of any action by the Company which would materially reduce the Grantee’s target opportunity under any annual bonus program; (iv) a relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters to a location more than 50 miles outside of Folsom, New Jersey, or the Grantee’s relocation by the Company to any place more than 50 miles from the location at which the Grantee performed the Grantee’s duties except for required travel by the Grantee on the Company’s business; or (v) a material breach by the Company of any employment or change in control agreement between the Company and the Grantee. | Company | HQ | | Revenue | | | Net Income(2) | | | Total Assets | | | Market Cap(3) | | | Employees | | GICS Description | | AGL Resources | GA | | $ | 2,373 | | | $ | 234 | | | $ | 7,518 | | | $ | 3,197 | | | | 2,621 | | Gas Utilities | | Atmos Energy | TX | | | 4,790 | | | | 206 | | | | 6,764 | | | | 2,930 | | | | 4,913 | | Gas Utilities | | Black Hills | SD | | | 1,307 | | | | 69 | | | | 3,712 | | | | 1,208 | | | | 2,124 | | Multi-Utilities | | CH Energy Group | NY | | | 972 | | | | 39 | | | | 1,729 | | | | 805 | | | | 1,250 | | Multi-Utilities | | Energen | AL | | | 1,579 | | | | 291 | | | | 4,364 | | | | 2,947 | | | | 1,530 | | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | | Laclede Group | MO | | | 1,735 | | | | 54 | | | | 1,840 | | | | 869 | | | | 1,697 | | Gas Utilities | | New Jersey Resources | NJ | | | 2,639 | | | | 117 | | | | 2,563 | | | | 1,764 | | | | 887 | | Gas Utilities | | Nicor | IL | | | 2,710 | | | | 138 | | | | 4,497 | | | | 2,506 | | | | 3,800 | | Gas Utilities | | Northwest Natural Gas | OR | | | 812 | | | | 73 | | | | 2,617 | | | | 1,176 | | | | 1,028 | | Gas Utilities | | Piedmont Natural Gas | NC | | | 1,552 | | | | 142 | | | | 3,053 | | | | 2,085 | | | | 1,788 | | Gas Utilities | | Southwest Gas | NV | | | 1,830 | | | | 104 | | | | 3,984 | | | | 1,659 | | | | 4,802 | | Gas Utilities | | Vectren | IN | | | 2,130 | | | | 134 | | | | 4,764 | | | | 2,215 | | | | 860 | | Multi-Utilities | | WGL Holdings | DC | | | 2,709 | | | | 111 | | | | 3,644 | | | | 2,004 | | | | 1,399 | | Gas Utilities | | 75th Percentile | | | $ | 2,639 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 4,497 | | | $ | 2,506 | | | | 2,621 | | | | Median | | | | 1,830 | | | | 117 | | | | 3,712 | | | | 2,004 | | | | 1,697 | | | | 25th Percentile | | | | 1,552 | | | | 73 | | | | 2,617 | | | | 1,208 | | | | 1,250 | | | | SJI | NJ | | $ | 925 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 2,077 | | | $ | 1,494 | | | | 650 | | Gas Utilities | | -Percentile Rank | | | | 6 | % | | | 16 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 30 | % | | low | | |
Notes:(v) “Grantee” means an Eligible Participant who is selected by the Board to receive an Award under the Plan.
| (1) As of most recently reported fiscal year |
| (2) Before extraordinary items and discontinued operations |
| (3) As of September 30, 2011 |
(w) “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to meet the requirements of an incentive stock option under section 422 of the Code. (x) “Key Advisor” means a consultant or advisor who performs services for the Company, provided that he or she renders bona fide services to the Company, the services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and the individual does not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Parent Company’s securities. Director Cash(y) “Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not an Employee.
(z) “Non-Qualified Option” means an Option that is not intended to be taxed as an incentive stock option under section 422 of the Code. (aa) “Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or Non-Qualified Option, as described in Section 9. (bb) “Other Stock-Based Award” means any Award based on, measured by or payable in Common Stock (other than an Option, Stock Unit, Stock Award or SAR), as described in Section 11. (cc) “Parent Company” means South Jersey Industries, Inc. (dd) “Performance Goals” means annual consolidated earnings per share; the price of shares of Common Stock; the market share of the Company (or any business unit thereof); sales by the Company (or any business unit thereof); return factors (including, but not limited to return on equity, capital employed, or investment; risk adjusted return on capital; return on investors’ capital; return on average equity; return on assets; and return on net assets); costs of the Company (or any business unit thereof); the Company’s total shareholder return; revenues; debt level; cash flow; capital expenditures; net income or gross income; operating income; expenses; net borrowing; goals related to mergers, acquisitions, dispositions or similar business transactions; assets; regulatory compliance; employee retention/attrition rates; individual business objectives; risk management activities; corporate value measures which may be objectively determined (including ethics, compliance, environmental, diversity commitment and safety); or implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; cost reduction targets; interest-sensitivity gap levels; weighted average cost of capital; working capital; operating or profit margin; pre-tax margin; contribution margin; book value; operating expenses (including, but not limited to lease operating expenses, severance taxes and other production taxes, gathering and transportation and general and administrative costs); unit costs; EBIT; EBITDA; debt to EBIT or EBITDA; interest coverage; comparative shareholder return; book value per share; net asset value per share; growth measures; debt to total capitalization ratio; asset quality levels; investments; economic value added; stock price appreciation; market capitalization; accounts receivables day sales outstanding; accounts receivables to sales; achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives; assets; asset sale targets; non-performing assets; satisfactory internal or external audits; improvement of financial ratings; charge-offs; amount of the gas reserves; costs of finding gas reserves; reserve replacement ratio, reserve additions, or other reserve level measures; drilling results; natural gas production, production and reserve growth; production volume; sales volume; production efficiency; inventory to sales; and inventory turns; and any other goal that is established at the discretion of the Board other than with respect to Awards intended to meet the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code under Section 13. Such Performance Goals may be particular to a Grantee or the division, department, branch, line of business, subsidiary or other unit in which the Grantee works, or may be based on attaining a specified absolute level of the Performance Goal, or a percentage increase or decrease in the Performance Goal compared to a pre-established target, previous years’ results, or a designated market index or comparison group, all as determined by the Board. The Board shall have sole discretion to determine specific targets within each category of Performance Goals. (ee) “Plan” means this South Jersey Industries, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as may be amended from time to time. (ff) “SAR” means a stock appreciation right as described in Section 10. (gg) “Stock Award” means an award of Common Stock as described in Section 7. (hh) “Stock Unit” means an award of a phantom unit representing a share of Common Stock, as described in Section 8. 3. Administration (a) Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. | | | Board | | | Committee | | | | | | | | | | Annual Cash Retainers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Company | | Presiding Director(1) | | | | | Non- Executive Chairman(1) | | | | | Board Member | | | | | Fees per Meeting | | | | | Total Mtg. Fees(2) | | | Member Retainers | | | Fees per Meeting | | | | | Total Mtg. Fees(3) | | | | | Total Cash Compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A | | | | | | B | | | | | C=B*9 | | | | D | | | | E | | | | | F=E*14 | | | | | G=A+C+D+F | | | AGL Resources | | $ | 20,000 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 35,000 | | | | | $ | 2,000 | | | | | $ | 18,000 | | | | | | | $ | 2,000 | | | | | $ | 28,000 | | | | | $ | 81,000 | | | Atmos Energy | | | 25,000 | | | | | | | | | | | 75,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 75,000 | | | Black Hills | | | 15,000 | | | | | | | | | | | 36,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 70,500 | | | CH Energy Group | | | 7,500 | | | | | | | | | | | 60,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 60,000 | | | Energen | | | 3,000 | | | | | | | | | | | 51,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | 1,667 | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 87,167 | | | Laclede Group | | | 12,000 | | | | | | | | | | | 55,000 | | | | | | 2,000 | | | | | | 18,000 | | | | | | | | 1,000 | | | | | | 14,000 | | | | | | 87,000 | | | New Jersey Resources | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | | | | 45,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 79,500 | | | Nicor | | | | | | (4) | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 84,500 | | | Northwest Natural Gas | | | | | | | | | 60,000 | | | | | | 90,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 124,500 | | | Piedmont Natural Gas | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 28,000 | | | (5) | | | 1,500 | | | (5) | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | (5) | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 62,500 | | | Southwest Gas | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 40,000 | | | | | | 1,650 | | | | | | 14,850 | | | | | | | | 1,650 | | | | | | 23,100 | | | | | | 77,950 | | | Vectren | | | 15,000 | | | | | | | | | (6) | | | 45,000 | | | | | | 1,250 | | | | | | 11,250 | | | | | | | | 1,250 | | | | | | 17,500 | | | | | | 73,750 | | | WGL Holdings | | | 15,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 84,500 | | | Prevalence | | | 77 | % | | | | | 15 | % | | | | | 100 | % | | | | | 85 | % | | | | | 85 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 85 | % | | | | | 85 | % | | | | | 100 | % | | 75th Percentile | | $ | 15,000 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 55,000 | | | | | $ | 1,575 | | | | | $ | 14,175 | | | | | | | $ | 1,500 | | | | | $ | 21,000 | | | | | $ | 84,500 | | | Median | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 79,500 | | | 25th Percentile | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 40,000 | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 13,500 | | | | | | | | 1,500 | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | | | 73,750 | | | SJI | | $ | 12,500 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 40,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 30,000 | | | $ | 1,500 | | | (7) | | $ | 6,000 | | | (8) | | $ | 76,000 | |
Notes:(c) Committee Determinations. The Board has delegated administration of the Plan to the Committee. The Board shall have full power and express discretionary authority to administer and interpret the Plan, to make factual determinations and to adopt or amend such rules, procedures, regulations, agreements and instruments for implementing the Plan and for the conduct of its business as it deems necessary or advisable, based on recommendations from the Committee. The Board’s interpretations of the Plan and all determinations made by the Board pursuant to the powers vested in it hereunder shall be conclusive and binding on all persons having any interest in the Plan or in any awards granted hereunder. All powers of the Board shall be executed in its sole discretion, in the best interest of the Company, not as a fiduciary, and in keeping with the objectives of the Plan and need not be uniform as to similarly situated Grantees. No person acting under this Section 3 shall be held liable for any action or determination made with respect to the Plan or any Award under the Plan, except for the willful misconduct or gross negligence of such person.
Percentiles exclude zeros, are independently arrayed,(d) Delegation of Administration. The Committee may delegate certain administrative matters under the Plan to such other officer or officers of the Company as determined in the Committee’s discretion, and therefore do not add acrosssuch administrator(s) may have the authority to execute and distribute Award Agreements in accordance with the Board’s determinations, to maintain records relating to the granting, vesting, exercise, forfeiture or expiration of Awards, to process or oversee the issuance of shares or cash upon the exercise, vesting and/or settlement of an Award, and to take such other administrative actions as the Board may specify. Any delegation by the Committee pursuant to this Section 3(d) shall be subject to such conditions and limitations as may be determined by the Committee and shall be subject to and limited by applicable law or regulation, including without limitation the general corporation law of the State of New Jersey and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange or such other securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed.
| (1) Amounts shown here represent retainers in excess of regular Board retainer |
| (2) Assumes attendance at 9 Board meetings (number of SJI Board meetings in 2011) |
| (3) Assumes attendance at 14 committee meetings (number of estimated committee meetings per director in 2011) |
| (4) Lead Director received an additional payment of $100,000 in 2010 for role in merger-related activities |
| (5) 25% match for retainer and meeting fees if a director elects to invest all of his or her retainers and meeting fees in the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan |
| (6) As of 2010, Company also has a Non-Executive Chairman but has not implemented an additional annual retainer as of yet |
| (7) $1,500 in excess of four meetings |
| (8) Reflects total meeting fees in excess of the first four meetings |
4. Awards and Vesting Restrictions (a) Awards under the Plan may consist of Stock Awards as described in Section 7, Stock Units as described in Section 8, Options as described in Section 9, SARs as described in Section 10, Other Stock-Based Awards as described in Section 11 and Cash Incentive Awards as described in Section 12. All Awards shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate and as are specified in writing to the Grantee in the Award Agreement. (b) Awards shall be subject to vesting over a period of not less than one year, subject to the following provisions as may be determined by the Board: (i) vesting of Awards may be accelerated in connection with a Participant’s death or disability, or in the event of a change in control; and (ii) an Award Agreement for a Non-Employee Director Equity Compensationmay include vesting over a period of less than one year and/or accelerated vesting in connection with the Non-Employee Director’s retirement. (c) All Awards shall be made conditional upon the Grantee’s acknowledgement, in writing or by acceptance of the Award, that all decisions and determinations of the Board shall be final and binding on the Grantee, his or her beneficiaries and any other person having or claiming an interest under such Award. Awards under a particular Section of the Plan need not be uniform as among the Grantees. 5. Shares Subject to the Plan (a) Shares Authorized. Subject to adjustment as described in subsection (d) below, the total aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 1,200,000 shares. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which all Awards of Incentive Stock Options may be made under the Plan shall be 1,200,000 shares, subject to adjustment as described in subsection (d). (b) Source of Shares; Share Counting. Shares issued under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock or reacquired shares of Common Stock, including shares purchased by the Company on the open market for purposes of the Plan. If and to the extent Options or SARs granted under the Plan terminate, expire or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised, and if and to the extent that any Stock Awards, Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Awards are forfeited or terminated, or otherwise are not paid in full, the shares reserved for such Awards shall again be available for purposes of the Plan. To the extent that any Awards are designated in an Award Agreement to be paid in cash, and not in shares of Common Stock, such Awards shall not count against the share limits in subsection (a). Shares of Common Stock surrendered in payment of the exercise price of an Option, and shares withheld or surrendered for payment of taxes, shall not be available for re-issuance under the Plan. If SARs are exercised and settled in Common Stock, the full number of shares subject to the SARs shall be considered issued under the Plan, without regard to the number of shares issued upon settlement of the SARs. The preceding provisions of this Section 5(b) shall apply only for purposes of determining the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan, but shall not apply for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted to any Grantee under the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, if shares of Common Stock are repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of the exercise price of Options, such shares may not again be made available for issuance under the Plan. | | | | | | | Full-Value Shares | | | Company | Description of Grants | | Share Price(1) | | | Annual | | | Initial(2) | | | Present Value | | | | | | | A | | | | B | | | | C | | | D=A*(B*5+ C)/5 | | | AGL Resources | Initial grant of 1,000 common shares and an annual grant of common stock valued at $70,000 (both grants received in the same year); immediately vested | | $ | 40.74 | | | | 1,718 | | | | 1,000 | | | $ | 78,148 | | | Atmos Energy | Annual grant of 3,000 phantom stock units; immediately vested | | $ | 32.45 | | | | 3,000 | | | | | | | $ | 97,350 | | | Black Hills | Annual grant of restricted stock valued at $60,000; 1-year vesting on a quarterly basis | | $ | 30.64 | | | | 1,958 | | | | | | | $ | 60,000 | | | CH Energy Group | Annual grant of phantom shares valued at $65,000; immediately vested and deferred until termination of Board service | | $ | 52.17 | | | | 1,246 | | | | | | | $ | 65,000 | | | Energen | Annual grant of common stock valued at $72,000; immediately vested | | $ | 40.89 | | | | 1,761 | | | | | | | $ | 72,000 | | | Laclede Group | Initial grant of 800 restricted shares and an annual grant of 1,600 restricted shares (both grants received in the same year); first half of shares vest on directors 65th birthday | | $ | 38.75 | | | | 1,600 | | | | 800 | | | $ | 68,200 | | | New Jersey Resources | Annual grant of 1,200 common shares; immediately vested | | $ | 42.57 | | | | 1,200 | | | | | | | $ | 51,084 | | | Nicor | Annual cash award with value equal to 1,200 common shares; immediately vested | | $ | 55.01 | | | | 1,200 | | | | | | | $ | 66,012 | | | Northwest Natural Gas | Directors do not receive equity grants | | $ | 44.10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Piedmont Natural Gas | Initial grant of $15,500 and an annual grant of $35,000 both required to be invested in company stock (both grants received in the same year); immediately vested | | $ | 28.89 | | | | 1,211 | | | | 537 | | | $ | 38,100 | | | Southwest Gas | Annual grant of 1,575 restricted shares; 3-year vesting | | $ | 36.17 | | | | 1,575 | | | | | | | $ | 56,968 | | | Vectren | Annual grant of stock unit awards valued at $50,000; 1-year vesting | | $ | 27.08 | | | | 1,846 | | | | | | | $ | 50,000 | | | WGL Holdings | Annual grant of restricted stock valued at $75,000; immediately vested | | $ | 39.07 | | | | 1,920 | | | | | | | $ | 75,000 | | | Prevalence | | | | | | | | 92 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 92 | % | | 75th Percentile | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 72,750 | | | Median | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 65,506 | | | 25th Percentile | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 55,497 | | | SJI | Annual grant of restricted stock valued at $60,000; 1-year vesting | | $ | 49.75 | | | | 1,206 | | | | | | | $ | 60,000 | |
| Percentiles exclude zeros, are independently arrayed, and therefore do not add across |
| (1) Closing share price on 09/30/11 |
(d) Adjustments. If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of Common Stock outstanding (i) by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split or combination or exchange of shares, (ii) by reason of a merger, reorganization or consolidation, (iii) by reason of a reclassification or change in par value, or (iv) by reason of any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding Common Stock as a class without the Company’s receipt of consideration, or if the value of outstanding shares of Common Stock is substantially reduced as a result of a spinoff or the Company’s payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock for which any individual may receive Awards in any year, the kind and number of shares covered by outstanding Awards, the kind and number of shares issued or transferred and to be issued or transferred under the Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such Awards shall be equitably adjusted by the Board, in such manner as the Board deems appropriate, to reflect any increase or decrease in the number of, or change in the kind or value of, the issued shares of Common Stock to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of rights and benefits under the Plan and such outstanding Awards; provided, however, that any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment shall be eliminated. In addition, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, the provisions of Section 17 of the Plan shall apply. Any adjustments to outstanding Awards shall be consistent with section 409A or 424 of the Code, to the extent applicable. Any adjustments determined by the Board shall be final, binding and conclusive. 6. Eligibility for Participation Director Total Compensation(a) Eligible Participants. All Employees, Non-Employee Directors and Key Advisors shall be eligible to participate in the Plan (referred to individually as an “Eligible Participant” and collectively as “Eligible Participants”).
(b) Selection of Grantees. The Committee shall recommend the Eligible Participants to receive Awards and the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each Award. (c) Continued Service. For purposes of this Plan, unless provided otherwise in the Award Agreement, a Grantee’s employment or service will not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Grantee renders service to the Company as an employee, non-employee member of the Board, or Key Advisor or a change in the Company entity for which the Grantee renders such service, provided that there is no interruption or termination of the Grantee’s continuous employment or service to the Company. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Plan that refer to “retirement” and “disability” shall not apply to a Grantee who is a Key Advisor. 7. Stock Awards (a) General Requirements. The Board may issue shares of Common Stock to an Eligible Participant under a Stock Award, upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate under this Section. Shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to Stock Awards may be issued for cash consideration or for no cash consideration, and subject to restrictions as determined by the Board. The Board may establish conditions under which restrictions on Stock Awards shall lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Board deems appropriate, including restrictions based upon the achievement of specific Performance Goals. The Board shall determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued pursuant to a Stock Award. (b) Requirement of Employment or Service. The Board shall determine under what circumstances a Grantee may retain Stock Awards after termination of the Grantee’s employment or service, and the circumstances under which Stock Awards may be forfeited. The circumstances shall be set forth in writing in the Award Agreement. (c) Restrictions on Transfer. While Stock Awards are subject to restrictions, a Grantee may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares of a Stock Award except upon death as described in Section 16(a). To the extent that the Company determines to issue certificates, each certificate for a share of a Stock Award shall contain a legend giving appropriate notice of the restrictions in the Award. The Grantee shall be entitled to have the legend removed when all restrictions on such shares have lapsed. The Company may retain possession of any certificates for Stock Awards until all restrictions on such shares have lapsed. | | | Cash Compensation | | | Equity Compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | Company | | Board Retainer | | | Total Cash | | | Options | | | Full-Value Shares | | | Total Equity | | | Total Comp. | | | Non- Employee Directors | | | Aggregate Cost | | | AGL Resources | | $ | 35,000 | | | $ | 81,000 | | | | | | $ | 78,148 | | | $ | 78,148 | | | $ | 159,148 | | | | 11 | | | $ | 1,750,628 | | | Atmos Energy | | | 75,000 | | | | 75,000 | | | | | | | 97,350 | | | | 97,350 | | | | 172,350 | | | | 11 | | | | 1,895,850 | | | Black Hills | | | 36,000 | | | | 70,500 | | | | | | | 60,000 | | | | 60,000 | | | | 130,500 | | | | 8 | | | | 1,044,000 | | | CH Energy Group | | | 60,000 | | | | 60,000 | | | | | | | 65,000 | | | | 65,000 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 8 | | | | 1,000,000 | | | Energen | | | 51,000 | | | | 87,167 | | | | | | | 72,000 | | | | 72,000 | | | | 159,167 | | | | 9 | | | | 1,432,500 | | | Laclede Group | | | 55,000 | | | | 87,000 | | | | | | | 68,200 | | | | 68,200 | | | | 155,200 | | | | 8 | | | | 1,241,600 | | | New Jersey Resources | | | 45,000 | | | | 79,500 | | | | | | | 51,084 | | | | 51,084 | | | | 130,584 | | | | 9 | | | | 1,175,256 | | | Nicor | | | 50,000 | | | | 84,500 | | | | | | | 66,012 | | | | 66,012 | | | | 150,512 | | | | 12 | | | | 1,806,144 | | | Northwest Natural Gas | | | 90,000 | | | | 124,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 124,500 | | | | 10 | | | | 1,245,000 | | | Piedmont Natural Gas | | | 28,000 | | | | 62,500 | | | | | | | 38,100 | | | | 38,100 | | | | 100,600 | | | | 10 | | | | 1,006,000 | | | Southwest Gas | | | 40,000 | | | | 77,950 | | | | | | | 56,968 | | | | 56,968 | | | | 134,918 | | | | 10 | | | | 1,349,177 | | | Vectren | | | 45,000 | | | | 73,750 | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 123,750 | | | | 11 | | | | 1,361,250 | | | WGL Holdings | | | 50,000 | | | | 84,500 | | | | | | | 75,000 | | | | 75,000 | | | | 159,500 | | | | 6 | | | | 957,000 | | | Prevalence | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 92 | % | | | 92 | % | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | 100 | % | | 75th Percentile | | $ | 55,000 | | | $ | 84,500 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 72,750 | | | $ | 159,148 | | | | 11 | | | $ | 1,432,500 | | | Median | | | 50,000 | | | | 79,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | 65,506 | | | | 134,918 | | | | 10 | | | | 1,245,000 | | | 25th Percentile | | | 40,000 | | | | 73,750 | | | | | | | | | | | | 55,497 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 8 | | | | 1,044,000 | | | SJI | | $ | 40,000 | | | $ | 76,000 | | | | | | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 136,000 | | | | 8 | | | $ | 1,088,000 | |
Notes:
Percentiles exclude zeros, are independently arrayed, and therefore do not add across8. Stock Units
Director Pay Mix(a) General Requirements. The Board may grant Stock Units to an Eligible Participant, upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate under this Section 8, subject to Section 4(b). Each Stock Unit shall represent the right of the Grantee to receive a share of Common Stock or an amount based on the value of a share of Common Stock upon the Company’s achievement of Performance Goals established by the Board. All Stock Units shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan.
(b) Terms of Stock Units. The Board may grant Stock Units that are payable on terms and conditions determined by the Board, which may include payment based on achievement of specified Performance Goals. Stock Units may be paid at the end of a specified vesting or performance period, subject to Section 4(b), or payment may be deferred to a date authorized by the Board. The Board shall determine the number of Stock Units to be granted and the requirements applicable to such Stock Units. (c) Payment With Respect to Stock Units. Payment with respect to Stock Units shall be made in cash, in Common Stock, or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Board. The Award Agreement shall specify the maximum number of shares that can be issued under the Stock Units. (d) Requirement of Employment or Service. The Board shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances a Grantee may retain Stock Units after termination of the Grantee’s employment or service, and the circumstances under which Stock Units may be forfeited. (e) Dividend Equivalents. The Board may grant Dividend Equivalents in connection with Stock Units, under such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate. Dividend Equivalents may be paid to Grantees currently or may be deferred. All Dividend Equivalents that are not paid currently shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan. Dividend Equivalents may be accrued as a cash obligation, or may be converted to additional Stock Units for the Grantee, and deferred Dividend Equivalents may accrue interest, all as determined by the Board. The Board may provide that Dividend Equivalents shall be payable based on the achievement of specific performance goals. Dividend Equivalents may be payable in cash or shares of Common Stock or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Board. 9. Options (a) General Requirements. The Board may grant Options to an Eligible Participant upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate under this Section 9, subject to Section 4(b). The Board shall determine the number of shares of Common Stock that will be subject to each Award of Options to an Eligible Participant. (b) Type of Option, Price and Term. (i) The Board may grant Incentive Stock Options or Non-Qualified Options or any combination of the two, all in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees of the Parent Company or its subsidiaries, as defined in section 424 of the Code. Non-Qualified Options may be granted to Eligible Participants. (ii) The Exercise Price of Common Stock subject to an Option shall be determined by the Board and may be equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Option is granted. However, an Incentive Stock Option may not be granted to an Employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary, as defined in section 424 of the Code, unless the Exercise Price per share is more than 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. (iii) The Board shall determine the term of each Option, which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. However, an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to an Employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary, as defined in section 424 of the Code, may not have a term that exceeds five years from the date of grant. (c) Exercisability of Options. Options shall become exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Board and specified in the Award Agreement. The Board may grant Options that are subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions. The Board may accelerate the exercisability of any or all outstanding Options at any time for any reason, subject to Section 4(b). | | | | | | Equity Compensation | | | | | | Company | | Cash Comp. | | | Options | | | Full-Value Shares | | | Total | | | Total Comp. | | | AGL Resources | | | 56 | % | | | | | | | 44 | % | | | 44 | % | | | 100 | % | | Atmos Energy | | | 44 | % | | | | | | | 56 | % | | | 56 | % | | | 100 | % | | Black Hills | | | 54 | % | | | | | | | 46 | % | | | 46 | % | | | 100 | % | | CH Energy Group | | | 48 | % | | | | | | | 52 | % | | | 52 | % | | | 100 | % | | Energen | | | 55 | % | | | | | | | 45 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 100 | % | | Laclede Group | | | 61 | % | | | | | | | 39 | % | | | 39 | % | | | 100 | % | | New Jersey Resources | | | 61 | % | | | | | | | 39 | % | | | 39 | % | | | 100 | % | | Nicor | | | 56 | % | | | | | | | 44 | % | | | 44 | % | | | 100 | % | | Northwest Natural Gas | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | % | | | 100 | % | | Piedmont Natural Gas | | | 67 | % | | | | | | | 33 | % | | | 33 | % | | | 100 | % | | Southwest Gas | | | 58 | % | | | | | | | 42 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 100 | % | | Vectren | | | 60 | % | | | | | | | 40 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 100 | % | | WGL Holdings | | | 53 | % | | | | | | | 47 | % | | | 47 | % | | | 100 | % | | 75th Percentile | | | 61 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 46 | % | | | 100 | % | | Median | | | 56 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 44 | % | | | 100 | % | | 25th Percentile | | | 54 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 39 | % | | | 100 | % | | SJI | | | 56 | % | | | | | | | 44 | % | | | 44 | % | | | 100 | % |
Percentiles exclude zeros, are independently arrayed,(e) Exercise of Options. A Grantee may exercise an Option that has become exercisable, in whole or in part, by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company. The Grantee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash, (ii) if permitted by the Board, by delivering shares of Common Stock owned by the Grantee and therefore do not add acrosshaving a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price or by attestation to ownership of shares of Common Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price, (iii) by payment through a broker in accordance with procedures permitted by Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board, (iv) with approval of the Board, by surrender of all or any part of the vested shares of Common Stock for which the Option is exercisable to the Company for an appreciation distribution payable in shares of Common Stock with a Fair Market Value at the time of the Option surrender equal to the dollar amount by which the then Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock subject to the surrendered portion exceeds the aggregate Exercise Price payable for those shares, (v) by such other method as the Board may approve, to the extent permitted by applicable law, or (vi) by any combination of the foregoing. Shares of Common Stock used to exercise an Option shall have been held by the Grantee for the requisite period of time to avoid adverse accounting consequences to the Company with respect to the Option. Payment for the shares pursuant to the Option, and any required withholding taxes, must be received by the time specified by the Board depending on the type of payment being made, but in all cases prior to the issuance of the Common Stock. No person shall have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any share of Common Stock covered by an Option unless and until such person shall have become the holder of record of such share, and, except as otherwise permitted in Section 5(d) hereof, no adjustment shall be made for dividends (ordinary or extraordinary, whether in cash, securities or other property or distributions or other rights) in respect of such share for which the record date is prior to the date on which such person shall have become the holder of record thereof.
(f) Limits on Incentive Stock Options. Each Incentive Stock Option shall provide that, if the aggregate Fair Market Value of the stock on the date of the grant with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a Grantee during any calendar year, under the Plan or any other stock option plan of the Company or a parent or subsidiary, as defined in section 424 of the Code, exceeds $100,000, then the Option, as to the excess, shall be treated as a Non-Qualified Option. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be granted to any person who is not an Employee of the Company or a parent or subsidiary, as defined in section 424 of the Code. Committee Chair10. Stock Appreciation Rights
(a) General Requirements. The Board may grant SARs to an Eligible Participant separately or in tandem with an Option. The Board shall establish the number of shares, the terms and Member Retainersthe base amount of the SAR at the time the SAR is granted. The base amount of each SAR shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of grant of the SAR. (b) Tandem SARs. The Board may grant tandem SARs either at the time the Option is granted or at any time thereafter while the Option remains outstanding; provided, however, that, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, SARs may be granted only at the date of the grant of the Incentive Stock Option. In the case of tandem SARs, the number of SARs granted to a Grantee that shall be exercisable during a specified period shall not exceed the number of shares of Common Stock that the Grantee may purchase upon the exercise of the related Option during such period. Upon the exercise of an Option, the SARs relating to the Common Stock covered by such Option shall terminate. Upon the exercise of SARs, the related Option shall terminate to the extent of an equal number of shares of Common Stock. (c) Exercisability; Term. A SAR shall become exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be specified. The Board may grant SARs that are subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions. The Board may accelerate the exercisability of any or all outstanding SARs at any time for any reason, subject to Section 4(b). The Board shall determine under what circumstances and during what periods a Grantee may exercise a SAR after termination of employment or service. A tandem SAR shall be exercisable only while the Option to which it is related is exercisable. The Board shall determine the term of each SAR, which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The circumstances shall be set forth in writing in the Award Agreement. (d) Exercise of SARs. When a Grantee exercises SARs, the Grantee shall receive in settlement of such SARs an amount equal to the value of the stock appreciation for the number of SARs exercised. The stock appreciation for a SAR is the amount by which the Fair Market Value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR exceeds the base amount of the SAR as specified in the Award Agreement. (e) Form of Payment. The Board shall determine whether the stock appreciation for a SAR shall be paid in the form of shares of Common Stock, cash or a combination of the two. For purposes of calculating the number of shares of Common Stock to be received, shares of Common Stock shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the SAR. 11. Other Stock-Based Awards The Board may grant to Eligible Employees other awards not specified in Sections 7, 8, 9 or 10 above that are based on, or measured by, Common Stock, on such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate, subject to Section 4(b). Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions and may be payable in Common Stock or cash, or in a combination of the two, as determined in the Award Agreement. | | | Audit Committee | | | Compensation Committee | | | Nominating & Governance Committee | | | Company | | Chair(1) | | | Member | | | Chair(1) | | | Member | | | Chair(1) | | | Member | | | AGL Resources | | $ | 12,000 | | | | | | $ | 8,000 | | | | | | $ | 6,000 | | | | | | Atmos Energy | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | Black Hills | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | 8,000 | | | | | | $ | 6,000 | | | | | | CH Energy Group | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | 7,500 | | | | | | | 7,500 | | | | | | Energen | | | 12,000 | | | | 3,000 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | 3,000 | | | | | | Laclede Group | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | 6,000 | | | | | | New Jersey Resources | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | Nicor | | | 15,000 | | | | | | | | 15,000 | | | | | | | 15,000 | | | | | | Northwest Natural Gas | | | 15,000 | | | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | Piedmont Natural Gas | | | 8,000 | | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | Southwest Gas | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | Vectren | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | 7,000 | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | WGL Holdings | | | 12,500 | | | | | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | | | | (2 | ) | | Prevalence | | | 100 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 92 | % | | | 0 | % | | 75th Percentile | | $ | 12,000 | | | | | | | $ | 10,000 | | | | | | | $ | 6,000 | | | | | | | Median | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | 8,000 | | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | 25th Percentile | | | 10,000 | | | | | | | | 7,000 | | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | SJI | | $ | 10,000 | | | | | | | $ | 8,000 | | | | | | | $ | 6,000 | | | | | |
Notes:The Board is authorized to grant Cash Incentive Awards to Eligible Participants. The Board shall, in its sole discretion, determine which such Eligible Participants will receive Cash Incentive Awards and the terms and conditions applicable to Cash Incentive Awards, including the criteria for the vesting of Cash Incentive Awards, which shall be based on such measures as the Board deems appropriate and need not relate to the value of shares of Common Stock. A “Cash Incentive Award” is an Award to be settled solely in cash.
(1) Amounts exclude committee member retainers
(2) Chair13. Qualified Performance-Based Compensation
(a) Designation as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The Board may determine that Stock Units, Stock Awards, Dividend Equivalents or Other Stock-Based Awards granted to an Employee shall be considered “qualified performance-based compensation” under section 162(m) of the GovernanceCode, in which case the provisions of this Section 13 shall apply. (b) Performance Goals. When Awards are made under this Section 13, the Board shall establish in writing (i) the objective Performance Goals that must be met, (ii) the period during which performance will be measured, (iii) the maximum amounts that may be paid if the Performance Goal are met, and (iv) any other conditions that the Board deems appropriate and consistent with the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code for “qualified performance-based compensation.” The Performance Goals shall satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation,” including the requirement that the achievement of the goals be substantially uncertain at the time they are established and that the Performance Goals be established in such a way that a third party with knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether and to what extent the Performance Goals have been met. The Board shall not have discretion to increase the amount of compensation that is payable, but may reduce the amount of compensation that is payable, pursuant to Awards identified by the Board as “qualified performance-based compensation.” (c) Criteria Used for Objective Performance Goals. The Board shall use objectively determinable Performance Goals. Performance Goals need not be uniform as among Grantees. (d) Timing of Establishment of Goals. Performance Goals must be pre-established by the Board. A Performance Goal is considered pre-established if it is established in writing not later than 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to which the Performance Goal relates, provided that the outcome is substantially uncertain at the time the Board actually established the goal. However, in no event will a Performance Goal be considered pre-established if it is established after 25% of the period of service (as scheduled in good faith at the time the goal is established) has elapsed. (e) Certification of Results. The Committee shall certify the performance results for the performance period specified in the Award Agreement after the performance period ends. The Board shall determine the amount, if any, to be paid pursuant to each Award based on the achievement of the Performance Goals and the satisfaction of all other terms of the Award Agreement. (f) Death, Disability or Other Circumstances. To the extent consistent with section 162(m) of the Code, the Board may provide in the Award Agreement that Awards under this Section 13 shall be payable, in whole or in part, in the event of the Grantee’s death or Disability, upon a Change in Control or under other circumstances consistent with the Treasury regulations and rulings under section 162(m) of the Code. (g) Impact of Extraordinary Items or Changes In Accounting. To the extent applicable, subject to the following sentence and unless the Board determines otherwise, the determination of the achievement of Performance Goals shall be determined based on the relevant financial measure, computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and in a manner consistent with the methods used in the Company’s audited financial statements. To the extent permitted by section 162(m) of the Code, in setting the Performance Goals within the period prescribed in Section 13(d), the Board may provide for adjustment as it deems appropriate, including for one or more of the following items: asset write-downs; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in accounting principles; changes in tax law or other laws affecting reported results; severance, contract termination and other costs related to exiting, modifying or reducing any business activities; costs of, and gains and losses from, the acquisition, disposition or abandonment of businesses or assets; gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt; stock compensation costs and other non-cash expenses; unrealized gains and losses relating to fair valuations of derivatives; any extraordinary non-recurring items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year; business or other structural changes in the total shareholder return peer group; and any other specified non-operating items as determined by the Board in setting performance goals. (h) Status of Performance Awards under Code Section 162(m). It is also the Lead Director;intent of the Company that Awards under this Section 13 constitute “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Code and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, the terms of this Section 13 shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with section 162(m) of the Code and regulations thereunder. If any provision of the Plan as in effect on the date of adoption of any agreements relating to Awards under this Section 13 does not receive an additional retainer for Chairing Committeecomply or is inconsistent with the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code or regulations thereunder, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements. 14. Deferrals The Board may permit or require a Grantee to defer receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of shares that would otherwise be due to the Grantee in connection with any Award. The Committee shall establish rules and procedures for any such deferrals, consistent with applicable requirements of section 409A of the Code. 15. Withholding of Taxes (a) Required Withholding. All Awards under the Plan shall be subject to applicable federal (including FICA), state and local tax withholding requirements. The Company may require that the Grantee or other person receiving or exercising Awards pay to the Company the amount of any federal, state or local taxes that the Company is required to withhold with respect to such Awards, or the Company may deduct from other wages paid by the Company the amount of any withholding taxes due with respect to such Awards. (b) Election to Withhold Shares. If the Board so permits, shares of Common Stock may be withheld to satisfy the Company’s tax withholding obligation with respect to Awards paid in Common Stock, at the time such Awards become taxable, up to an amount that does not exceed the minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal (including FICA), state and local tax liabilities. 16. Transferability of Awards (a) Restrictions on Transfer. Except as described in subsection (b) below, only the Grantee may exercise rights under an Award during the Grantee’s lifetime, and a Grantee may not transfer those rights except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. When a Grantee dies, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Grantee may exercise such rights. Any such successor must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to receive the Award under the Grantee’s will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution. (b) Transfer of Non-Qualified Options to or for Family Members. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may provide, in an Award Agreement, that a Grantee may transfer Non-Qualified Options to family members, or one or more trusts or other entities for the benefit of or owned by family members, consistent with applicable securities laws, according to such terms as the Board may determine; provided that the Grantee receives no consideration for the transfer of a Non-Qualified Option and the transferred Non-Qualified Option shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the Non-Qualified Option immediately before the transfer. 17. Consequences of a Change in Control (a) Assumption of Outstanding Awards. Upon a Change in Control where the Company is not the surviving corporation (or survives only as a subsidiary of another corporation), unless the Board determines otherwise, all outstanding Awards that are not exercised or paid at the time of the Change in Control shall be assumed by, or replaced with Awards that have comparable terms by, the surviving corporation (or a parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation). After a Change in Control, references to the “Company” as they relate to employment matters shall include the successor employer. (b) Vesting Upon Certain Terminations of Employment. Unless the Award Agreement provides otherwise, if a Grantee’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, or the Grantee terminates employment for Good Reason, in either case within 12 months following the Change in Control, the Grantee’s outstanding Awards shall become fully vested as of the date of such termination; provided that if the vesting of any such Awards is based, in whole or in part, on performance, the applicable Award Agreement shall specify how the portion of the Award that becomes vested pursuant to this Section 17(b) shall be calculated. (c) Other Alternatives. In the event of a Change in Control, if all outstanding Awards are not assumed by, or replaced with Awards that have comparable terms by, the surviving corporation (or a parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation), the Board may take any of the following actions with respect to any or all outstanding Awards, without the consent of any Grantee: (i) the Board may determine that outstanding Options and SARs shall automatically accelerate and become fully exercisable and the restrictions and conditions on outstanding Stock Awards shall immediately lapse; (ii) the Board may determine that Grantees shall receive a payment in settlement of outstanding Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Awards, in such amount and form as may be determined by the Board; (iii) the Board may require that Grantees surrender their outstanding Options and SARs in exchange for a payment by the Company, in cash or Common Stock as determined by the Board, in an amount equal to the amount, if any, by which the then Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Grantee’s unexercised Options and SARs exceeds the Option exercise price or SAR base amount; and (iv) after giving Grantees an opportunity to exercise all of their outstanding Options and SARs, the Board may terminate any or all unexercised Options and SARs at such time as the Board deems appropriate. Such surrender, termination or payment shall take place as of the date of the Change in Control or such other date as the Board may specify. Without limiting the foregoing, if the per share Fair Market Value of the Common Stock does not exceed the per share Option exercise price or SAR base amount, as applicable, the Company shall not be required to make any payment to the Grantee upon surrender of the Option or SAR. 18. Agreements with Grantees Each Award made under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement containing such terms and conditions as the Board shall approve. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Plan and the provisions of any Award Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall control. 19. Requirements for Issuance of Shares No Common Stock Ownership Guidelinesshall be issued in connection with any Award hereunder unless and until all legal requirements applicable to the issuance of such Common Stock have been complied with to the satisfaction of the Board. The Board shall have the right to condition any Award made to any Grantee hereunder on such Grantee’s undertaking in writing to comply with such restrictions on his or her subsequent disposition of such shares of Common Stock as the Board shall deem necessary or advisable, and if the Company determines to issue certificates representing such shares, such certificates may be legended to reflect any such restrictions. Any certificates representing shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan will be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as may be required by applicable laws, regulations and interpretations, including any requirement that a legend be placed thereon. No Grantee shall have any right as a shareholder with respect to Common Stock covered by an Award until shares have been issued to the Grantee. 20. Amendment and Termination of the Plan (a) Amendment. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan or an Award at any time, provided, however, that the Board shall not amend the Plan without approval of the shareholders of the Company if such approval is required in order to comply with the Code or applicable laws, or to comply with applicable stock exchange requirements. No amendment or termination of this Plan or an Award shall, without the consent of the Grantee, materially impair any rights or obligations under any Award previously made to the Grantee under the Plan, unless such right has been reserved in the Plan or the Award Agreement, or except as provided in Section 21(b) below. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Board may amend the Plan in such manner as it deems appropriate in the event of a change in applicable law or regulations. (b) No Repricing Without Shareholder Approval. Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of Common Stock, other securities, or other property), stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, change in control, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of shares of Common Stock or other securities, or similar transactions), the Company may not, without obtaining stockholder approval: (i) amend the terms of outstanding Options or SARs to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding Options or SARs; (ii) cancel outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs; or (iii) cancel outstanding Options or SARs with an exercise price above the current stock price in exchange for cash or other securities. This Section 20(b) is intended to govern the repricing or exchange of “underwater” Options and SARs and shall not be construed to prohibit the adjustments provided for in Section 5(d) of this Plan. (c) Shareholder Approval for “Qualified Performance-Based Compensation.” If Awards are made under Section 13 above, the Plan must be reapproved by the Company’s shareholders no later than the first shareholders meeting that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which the shareholders previously approved the provisions of Section 13, if additional Awards are to be made under Section 13 and if required by section 162(m) of the Code or the regulations thereunder. (d) Termination of Plan. The Plan shall terminate on the day immediately preceding the tenth anniversary of its Effective Date, unless the Plan is terminated earlier by the Board or is extended by the Board with the approval of the shareholders. The termination of the Plan shall not impair Awards outstanding or the power and authority of the Board with respect to an outstanding Award. 21. Miscellaneous (a) Effective Date. The Plan shall be effective as of the Effective Date, if approved by the Company’s shareholders on such date. (b) Awards in Connection with Corporate Transactions and Otherwise. Nothing contained in this Plan shall be construed to (i) limit the right of the Board to make Awards under this Plan in connection with the acquisition, by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation or otherwise, of the business or assets of any corporation, firm or association, including Awards to employees thereof who become Employees, or for other proper corporate purposes, or (ii) limit the right of the Company to grant stock options or make other stock-based awards outside of this Plan. Without limiting the foregoing, the Board may make an Award to an employee of another corporation who becomes an Employee by reason of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or property, reorganization or liquidation involving the Company in substitution for a grant made by such corporation. The terms and conditions of the Awards may vary from the terms and conditions required by the Plan and from those of the substituted stock incentives, as determined by the Board. (c) Compliance with Law. (i) The Plan, the exercise of Options and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Common Stock under Awards shall be subject to all applicable laws and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. With respect to persons subject to section 16 of the Exchange Act, it is the intent of the Company that the Plan and all transactions under the Plan comply with all applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the Exchange Act. In addition, it is the intent of the Company that Incentive Stock Options comply with the applicable provisions of section 422 of the Code, and Awards of “qualified performance-based compensation” comply with the applicable provisions of section 162(m) of the Code. To the extent that any legal requirement of section 16 of the Exchange Act or section 422 or 162(m) as set forth in the Plan ceases to be required under section 16 of the Exchange Act or section 422 or 162(m) of the Code, that Plan provision shall cease to apply. The Board may revoke any Award if it is contrary to law or modify an Award to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory government regulation. The Board may also adopt rules regarding the withholding of taxes on payments to Grantees. The Board may, in its sole discretion, agree to limit its authority under this Section. (ii) The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of section 409A of the Code, to the extent applicable. Each Award shall be construed and administered such that the Award either (A) qualifies for an exemption from the requirements of section 409A of the Code or (B) satisfies the requirements of section 409A of the Code. If an Award is subject to section 409A of the Code, (I) distributions shall only be made in a manner and upon an event permitted under section 409A of the Code, (II) payments to be made upon a termination of employment shall only be made upon a “separation from service” under section 409A of the Code, (III) unless the Award specifies otherwise, each installment payment shall be treated as a separate payment for purposes of section 409A of the Code, and (IV) in no event shall a Grantee, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year in which a distribution is made except in accordance with section 409A of the Code. (iii) Any Award that is subject to section 409A of the Code and that is to be distributed to a Key Employee (as defined below) upon separation from service shall be administered so that any distribution with respect to such Award shall be postponed for six months following the date of the Grantee’s separation from service, if required by section 409A of the Code. If a distribution is delayed pursuant to section 409A of the Code, the distribution shall be paid within 30 days after the end of the six-month period. If the Grantee dies during such six-month period, any postponed amounts shall be paid within 90 days of the Grantee’s death. The determination of Key Employees, including the number and identity of persons considered Key Employees and the identification date, shall be made by the Board or its delegate each year in accordance with section 416(i) of the Code and the “specified employee” requirements of section 409A of the Code. (iv) Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, each Grantee shall be solely responsible for the tax consequences of Awards under the Plan, and in no event shall the Company have any responsibility or liability if an Award does not meet any applicable requirements of section 409A of the Code. Although the Company intends to administer the Plan to prevent taxation under section 409A of the Code, the Company does not represent or warrant that the Plan or any Award complies with any provision of federal, state, local or other tax law. (d) Enforceability. The Plan shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Company and its successors and assigns. (e) Funding of the Plan; Limitation on Rights. This Plan shall be unfunded. The Company shall not be required to establish any special or separate fund or to make any other segregation of assets to assure the payment of any Awards under this Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan and no action taken pursuant hereto shall create or be construed to create a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Grantee or any other person. No Grantee or any other person shall under any circumstances acquire any property interest in any specific assets of the Company. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payment from the Company hereunder, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company. (f) Rights of Grantees. Nothing in this Plan shall entitle any Employee, Non-Employee Director, Key Advisor or other person to any claim or right to receive an Award under this Plan. Neither this Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any individual any rights to be retained by or in the employment or service of the Employer. (g) Fractional Shares. No fractional shares of Common Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. Any fractional shares of Common Stock that would result under an Award shall be rounded to the nearest whole share using conventional rounding (greater than or equal to .50 round up, less than .50 round down). (h) Employees Subject to Taxation Outside the United States. With respect to Grantees who are subject to taxation in countries other than the United States, the Board may make Awards on such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate to comply with the laws of the applicable countries, and the Board may create such procedures, addenda and subplans and make such modifications as may be necessary or advisable to comply with such laws. (1) Fixed(i) Company Policies. All Awards under the Plan will be subject to any compensation, share guidelinestrading, clawback, recoupment and other policies that may be applicable to the employees of the Company, as in effect from time to time and as approved by the Board, whether or not approved before or after the effective date of the Plan.
(j) Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan or of any Award Agreement shall be held to be illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of the Plan or Award Agreement, and the Plan or Award Agreement shall be construed or enforced as though the illegal or invalid provision had not been included. (k) Headings. The section headings of the Plan are valued usingfor reference only. In the company’s 9/30/11 closing stock priceevent of a conflict between a section heading and the content of a Section of the Plan, the content of the Section shall control. (2) Directors must retain 90%
(l) Governing Law. Except to the extent preempted by any applicable federal law, the Plan and Award Agreements shall be governed and construed by and determined in accordance with the laws of their shares untilNew Jersey, without giving effect to the guideline is metconflict of laws provisions thereof. Please note the meeting location!   Directions to The Mansion on Main StreetStockton Seaview Hotel and Golf Club for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders The Mansion on Main StreetStockton Seaview Hotel and Golf Club, Bayview Room
3000 Main Street, Voorhees, NJ 08043401 South New York Road, Galloway, New Jersey
Versailles Room on
9:15 a.m. - doors will open to the 3rd levelpublic for continental breakfast 10:00 a.m. - meeting begins 11:00 a.m. - meeting adjourns Admission to the Meeting: Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to shareholders as of the record date, their authorized representatives and guests of SJI. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, you will need an admission ticket and a valid government issued photo ID to enter the meeting. For shareholders of record, an admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please bring your account statement as that will serve as your ticket. Parking Instructions: Free valet parking is available at the hotel’s main entrance on New York Rd. (Route 9). The meeting will be held in a separate building so please note you will have a long walk if you valet park. Signs will guide you to the meeting room. Self parking adjacent to the meeting room is located on Bartlett Ave, which is off of New York Rd (Route 9). Shuttle service from self parking to the Bayview Room is available. From Philadelphia:North: Ben Franklin Bridge to route 70 East. Follow to Route 73 South. Follow to Evesham Road. Turn rightGarden State Parkway, Exit 48, South on Evesham Road. Continue for 1 1/2 miles. Turn left into Main Street Complex.New York Road (Route 9) (7 miles). Resort on Right.
From North Jersey:West: Atlantic City Expressway, Exit 12, Left on Wrangleboro Road (Route 575) for 3.8 miles, Right on Jimmie Leeds Road. Proceed east 5.9 miles. Right on New Jersey Turnpike South to Exit 4. Follow Route 73 South. Follow to Evesham Road. Turn rightYork Road (Route 9). Resort on Evesham Road. Continue for 1 1/2 miles. Turn left into Main Street Complex.Right. From South Jersey /Atlantic City:(Absecon): Mill Rd toward Delaware Ave. (.4 mi) Turn slight left onto E Wyoming Ave. (Route 9). Continue to follow Route 9 (2 mi). Resort is on the Left. | SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. | VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29, 2015. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. | | | C/O BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC. | | | | P.O. BOX 1342 BRENTWOOD, NY 11717 | ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. | | | | | | | | VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29, 2015. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. | | | | | | | | VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. | |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: M87167-P62649-Z65158 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. To elect ten Directors (term expiring 2016). For Against Abstain 1a. Sarah M. Barpoulis 1b. Thomas A. Bracken For Against Abstain 1c. Keith S. Campbell 2. To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation. 1d. Sheila Hartnett-Devlin 3. To adopt the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. 1e. Victor A. Fortkiewicz 4. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2015. 1f. Walter M. Higgins III 5. To transact other business that may properly come before the meeting. 5. To transact other business that may properly come before the meeting. 1g. Sunita Holzer 1h. Joseph H. Petrowski 1i. Michael J. Renna 1j. Frank L. Sims Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting Yes No Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date 2015 Annual Meeting Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 10:00 AM Stockton Seaview Hotel & Golf Club Bayview Room 401 South New York Road, Galloway, NJ 08205 The top portion of this proxy card is your admission ticket for entry into the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Directions: From the North: Garden State Parkway, Exit 48, South on New York Road/Route 9 (7 miles). Resort on Right. From the West: Atlantic City Expressway, Exit 12, Left on Wrangleboro Road/Route 575 (3.8 miles), Right on Jimmie Leeds Road. Proceed east 5.9 miles. Right on New York Road/Route 9. Resort on Right. From the South (Absecon): Mill Rd toward Delaware Ave (4 miles). Turn slight left onto E Wyoming Ave/Route 9. Continue to follow Route 73 North. Continue9 (2 miles). Resort is on Route 73 North to Evesham Road. Turn left on Evesham Road. Continue for 1 1/2 miles. Turn left into Main Street Complex.Left. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. | SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 30, 2015 10:00 AM This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Edward J. Graham and Gina Merritt-Epps, Esq., or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint (his/her) substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common stock of SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time on Thursday, April 30, 2015, at the Stockton Seaview Hotel & Golf Club, Bayview Room, 401 South New York Road, Galloway, NJ 08205, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side | |
  |
|
|
|
